0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views2 pages

United States v. Benjamin Maduka, 914 F.2d 1492, 4th Cir. (1990)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a district court decision denying Benjamin Maduka relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no merit to Maduka's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion in the case of United States v. Maduka.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
96 views2 pages

United States v. Benjamin Maduka, 914 F.2d 1492, 4th Cir. (1990)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a district court decision denying Benjamin Maduka relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's decision, finding no merit to Maduka's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its opinion in the case of United States v. Maduka.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

914 F.

2d 1492
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Benjamin MADUKA, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 90-7328.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Aug. 10, 1990.
Decided Sept. 24, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CR No. 86-640-HAR;
C/A No. 89-61-HAR).
Benjamin Maduka, appellant pro se.
Breckinridge Long Willcox, United States Attorney, Donna Helen
Triptow, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md., for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN and SPROUSE, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Benjamin Maduka appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under
28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
accepting the recommendation of the magistrate discloses that this appeal is

without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.


United States v. Maduka, CR No. 86-640-HAR; C/A No. 89-61-HAR (D.Md.
May 1, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like