0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views2 pages

Gregory Keith Peery v. Michael W. Cox Charles Ingalls Dennis Burns, 958 F.2d 368, 4th Cir. (1992)

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of Gregory Keith Peery's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found that Peery's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case number CA-92-69-R. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views2 pages

Gregory Keith Peery v. Michael W. Cox Charles Ingalls Dennis Burns, 958 F.2d 368, 4th Cir. (1992)

The document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of Gregory Keith Peery's claim under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit found that Peery's appeal was without merit based on the reasoning provided by the district court in case number CA-92-69-R. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

958 F.

2d 368

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Gregory Keith PEERY, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Michael W. COX; Charles Ingalls; Dennis Burns, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 92-6144.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 2, 1992.
Decided March 18, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of
Virginia, at Roanoke. Jackson L. Kiser, District Judge. (CA-92-69-R)
Gregory Keith Peery, appellant pro se.
W.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

Gregory Keith Peery appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Peery v. Cox, No. CA-92-69-R (W.D.Va.

Jan. 22, 1992). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like