0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views1 page

Jameel Mateen v. Ed Murray L.B. Cie: H.L. Underwood, 816 F.2d 672, 4th Cir. (1987)

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff, Jameel Mateen, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in other cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no need to further explain based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its December 22, 1986 decision.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
13 views1 page

Jameel Mateen v. Ed Murray L.B. Cie: H.L. Underwood, 816 F.2d 672, 4th Cir. (1987)

This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1987. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the plaintiff, Jameel Mateen, under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The appellate court found the appeal to be without merit based on issues recently decided in other cases. The court dispensed with oral argument and affirmed the lower court's ruling, finding no need to further explain based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its December 22, 1986 decision.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

816 F.

2d 672
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Jameel MATEEN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Ed MURRAY; L.B. Cie: H.L. Underwood, DefendantsAppellees.
No. 87-7029.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Feb. 27, 1987.
Decided April 7, 1987.

Before HALL and ERVIN, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER, Senior Circuit
Judge.
Jameel Mateen, appellant pro se.
Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. Mateen v. Murray, C/A No. 86-548 (W.D.Va., Dec. 22,
1986).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like