0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Clarence B. Ross, Sr. v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of The Navy, 920 F.2d 927, 4th Cir. (1990)

Clarence B. Ross, Sr. filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the Secretary of the Navy under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary. Ross appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Ross' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its order granting summary judgment.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Clarence B. Ross, Sr. v. H. Lawrence Garrett, Iii, Secretary of The Navy, 920 F.2d 927, 4th Cir. (1990)

Clarence B. Ross, Sr. filed an employment discrimination lawsuit against the Secretary of the Navy under 42 U.S.C. § 2000e-16. The district court granted summary judgment in favor of the Secretary. Ross appealed. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding that Ross' appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its order granting summary judgment.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

920 F.

2d 927
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Clarence B. ROSS, SR., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
H. Lawrence GARRETT, III, Secretary of the Navy,
Defendant-Appellee.
No. 90-2666.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Oct. 16, 1990.
Decided Dec. 18, 1990.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Alexander Harvey, II, Chief District Judge. (CA-89-1957-H)
Clarence B. Ross, Sr., appellant pro se.
Dale Preston Kelberman, Assistant United States Attorney, Baltimore, M.,
for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before MURNAGHAN, WILKINS and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Clarence B. Ross, Sr. appeals from the district court's order granting summary
judgment in his employment discrimination action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 2000e-16. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion

discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the


reasoning of the district court. Ross v. Garrett, CA-89-1957-H (D.Md. Mar. 16,
1990). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like