Scribd
Upload
30 views2 pages

United States v. Edward S. Watson, 940 F.2d 654, 4th Cir. (1991)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on an appeal from Edward S. Watson, who filed a "Motion for Correction of Illegal Sentence" in district court. The district court denied Watson's motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
30 views2 pages

United States v. Edward S. Watson, 940 F.2d 654, 4th Cir. (1991)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a ruling on an appeal from Edward S. Watson, who filed a "Motion for Correction of Illegal Sentence" in district court. The district court denied Watson's motion. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

940 F.

2d 654
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Edward S. WATSON, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 91-7542.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted June 19, 1991.
Decided July 30, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CR-88-428-HAR)
Edward S. Watson, appellant pro se.
David Paul King, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore, Md.,
for appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before PHILLIPS, MURNAGHAN and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

Edward S. Watson appeals from the district court's order denying his "Motion
for Correction of Illegal Sentence," which he filed pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P.
35(a). Our review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that

this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the


district court. United States v. Watson, CR-88-428-HAR (D.Md. Mar. 4, 1991).
We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like