Scribd
Upload
28 views2 pages

United States v. James Joseph Owens, 989 F.2d 496, 4th Cir. (1993)

The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1993. James Joseph Owens appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
28 views2 pages

United States v. James Joseph Owens, 989 F.2d 496, 4th Cir. (1993)

The document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1993. James Joseph Owens appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal had no merit based on the district court's opinion. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

989 F.

2d 496

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
James Joseph OWENS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 93-6096.

United States Court of Appeals,


Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: March 1, 1993
Decided: March 26, 1993

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Wilson. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CR-78-17-8,
CA-93-11-5)
James Joseph Owens, Appellant Pro Se.
G. Norman Acker, III, OFFICE OF THE UNITED STATES
ATTORNEY, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellee.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

OPINION
1

James Joseph Owens appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under

28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Owens, Nos. CR-78-17-8,
CA-93-11-5 (E.D.N.C. Jan. 11, 1993). We dispense with oral argument because
the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before
the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like