Scribd
Upload
14 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Daniel Zamber filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, as the issues had been recently decided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of relief under Section 1983 but noted their affirmance was without prejudice for Zamber to file a habeas corpus action under Section 2254 after exhausting state remedies, to seek restoration of good-time credits.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
14 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

Daniel Zamber filed a Section 1983 lawsuit against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, as the issues had been recently decided. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the denial of relief under Section 1983 but noted their affirmance was without prejudice for Zamber to file a habeas corpus action under Section 2254 after exhausting state remedies, to seek restoration of good-time credits.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

843 F.

2d 1389
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Daniel W. ZAMBER, Jr., Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W.P. ROGERS, Warden, Virginia Department of Corrections;
D.T. Mahon, Assistant Warden; J.C. Holloway,
Regional Ofc., Virginia Department of
Corrections, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 87-7364.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Feb. 29, 1988.
Decided: April 7, 1988.

Daniel W. Zamber, Jr., appellant pro se.


Robert Harkness Herring, Jr., Assistant Attorney General, for appellees.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and ERVIN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm* the judgment below on the reasoning
of the district court. Zamber v. Rogers, C/A No. 86-626-N (E.D.Va. Oct. 20,
1987).

AFFIRMED.

Our affirmance is without prejudice to Zamber's right to file a habeas corpus


action pursuant to 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254 seeking restoration of good-time credits,
after he has exhausted state remedies

You might also like