Scribd
Upload
23 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to the Appellant, Stephen Louis Moore, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
23 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It affirms the district court's denial of relief to the Appellant, Stephen Louis Moore, in his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 civil rights complaint. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's acceptance of the magistrate judge's recommendation. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's reasoning and dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

81 F.

3d 150

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Stephen Louis MOORE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Gary T. DIXON; J.B. French; Robey Lee; Ken Harris; R.D.
Britton; Bennie Mack; Carlton Joyner; Franklin
E. Freeman, Jr.; Lynn Phillips,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-7370.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 21, 1996.
Decided April 4, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
North Carolina, at Raleigh. W. Earl Britt, District Judge. (CA-93-644-5CT-BR)
Stephen Louis Moore, Appellant Pro Se. Jacob Leonard Safron, Special
Deputy Attorney General, Raleigh, North Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before NIEMEYER and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and BUTZNER,
Senior Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no


reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.
Moore v. Dixon, No. CA-93-644-5-CT-BR (E.D.N.C. Aug. 23, 1995). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like