0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views2 pages

Christine Ann Carrigan v. J. Joseph Curran, JR., Attorney General Melanie C. Pereira, Warden, 955 F.2d 40, 4th Cir. (1992)

The document discusses a court case involving Christine Ann Carrigan appealing a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views2 pages

Christine Ann Carrigan v. J. Joseph Curran, JR., Attorney General Melanie C. Pereira, Warden, 955 F.2d 40, 4th Cir. (1992)

The document discusses a court case involving Christine Ann Carrigan appealing a district court's denial of relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal without merit.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

955 F.

2d 40

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Christine Ann CARRIGAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
J. Joseph CURRAN, Jr., Attorney General; MELANIE C.
PEREIRA, Warden, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7355.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Feb. 3, 1992.
Decided Feb. 14, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. John R. Hargrove, District Judge. (CA-91-2713-CV)
Christine Ann Carrigan, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, HAMILTON and LUTTIG, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

Christine Ann Carrigan appeals from the district court's order denying relief
under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Carrigan v. Curran, No. CA-91-2713-CV
(D.Md. Oct. 11, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and

legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like