0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views2 pages

Simms v. Rollins, 959 F.2d 232, 4th Cir. (1992)

1) This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992 regarding a lawsuit filed by John William Simms under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2) The district court denied relief to Simms and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Simms' appeal. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in the district court's October 25, 1991 ruling in the case.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
20 views2 pages

Simms v. Rollins, 959 F.2d 232, 4th Cir. (1992)

1) This document is a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from 1992 regarding a lawsuit filed by John William Simms under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 2) The district court denied relief to Simms and the Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Simms' appeal. 3) The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's decision based on the reasoning provided in the district court's October 25, 1991 ruling in the case.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

959 F.

2d 232

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
John William SIMMS, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James N. ROLLINS, Warden; Shawn Jackson, Hearing Officer;
State of Maryland; Lucille Maurer, Treasurer;
JAMES TRIMBLE, Inmate 161658,
Defendants-Appellees.

No. 91-7732.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 28, 1992.
Decided April 7, 1992.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Walter E. Black, Jr., Chief District Judge. (CA-91-1079)
John William Simms, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before K.K. HALL, MURNAGHAN and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

John William Simms appeals from the district court's order denying relief under
42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Simms v. Rollins, No. CA-91-1079 (D.Md.

Oct. 25, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like