Jesse James Pritchard, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Harris Sergeant Lea G. M. Hinkle C. E. Thompson L. M. Saunders S. F. Taylor Jack Lee C. E. Byers, Sergeant Vicky Woods MacIe Millard Jane Does 1-10 John Does 1-10 Vdoc Employees, 50 F.3d 7, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government DocsJesse James Pritchard, Jr. v. Correctional Officer Harris Sergeant Lea G. M. Hinkle C. E. Thompson L. M. Saunders S. F. Taylor Jack Lee C. E. Byers, Sergeant Vicky Woods MacIe Millard Jane Does 1-10 John Does 1-10 Vdoc Employees, 50 F.3d 7, 4th Cir. (1995)
Uploaded by
Scribd Government Docs50 F.
3d 7
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of
unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Jesse James PRITCHARD, Jr., Plaintiff--Appellant,
v.
Correctional Officer HARRIS; Sergeant LEA; G. M.
HINKLE;
C. E. THOMPSON; L. M. SAUNDERS; S. F. TAYLOR; Jack
LEE;
C. E. BYERS, Sergeant; Vicky WOODS; Macie MILLARD;
Jane
DOES 1-10; John DOES 1-10; VDOC EMPLOYEES,
Defendants--Appellees.
No. 94-7407.
United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.
Submitted Jan. 19, 1995.
Decided Feb. 22, 1995.
Jesse James Pritchard, Jr., Appellant Pro Se.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:
Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Pritchard v. Harris, No. CA-94-674-R
(W.D.Va. Nov. 22, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
