Scribd
Upload
36 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Eldon Guy Bell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against state officials regarding his medical treatment which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation to deny Bell's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
36 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Eldon Guy Bell filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against state officials regarding his medical treatment which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error in the lower court's opinion accepting the magistrate's recommendation to deny Bell's complaint. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral arguments, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the materials provided to the court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

103 F.

3d 116

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Eldon Guy BELL, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
James B. HUNT, Jr., Governor; Franklin Free Man, Secretary
of Corrections; Talmadge L. Barnett, Superintendent of
Eastern Correction al Institution; Charles Eurgia Land,
Doctor; Doctor Baloch, Medical Director; Geneva Berry,
R.N.; Mrs. Lapinski, R.N., Nurse, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 96-7093.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Nov. 21, 1996.
Decided Dec. 4, 1996.

Eldon Guy Bell, Appellant Pro Se. Elizabeth F. Parsons, OFFICE OF


THE ATTORNEY GENERAL OF NORTH CAROLINA, Raleigh, North
Carolina, for Appellees.
E.D.N.C.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, HAMILTON, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1994) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the magistrate judge's recommendation and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the district court.

Bell v. Hunt, No. CA-94-860-5-CT-H (E.D.N.C. June 6, 1996). We dispense


with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like