Scribd
Upload
46 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 11, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Van Prince Welch, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
46 views2 pages

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

This document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from June 11, 1996. The court affirmed the district court's denial of relief to the appellant, Van Prince Welch, on his 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's reasoning. The court dispensed with oral argument, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the lower court's ruling.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

89 F.

3d 831

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Van Prince WELCH, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Captain FAULK; M.A. Phillips, Sergeant; Sergeant Carter;
Corporal Bailey; Officer Mcqueen, Defendants-Appellees,
and
J.R. Dewan; E.G. Tucker, Lieutenant, Defendants.
No. 96-6074.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted April 30, 1996.
Decided June 11, 1996.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-94991-2)
Van Prince Welch, Appellant Pro Se. Jeff Wayne Rosen, David Ian
Tenzer, ADLER, ROSEN & PETERS, P.C., Virginia Beach, Virginia, for
Appellees.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before WIDENER, WILKINS, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district court's

opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning


of the district court. Welch v. Faulk, No. CA-94-991-2 (E.D.Va. Dec. 19,
1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions
are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like