Scribd
Upload
21 views1 page

James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department, 73 F.3d 358, 4th Cir. (1996)

James Rodney Smith filed a Section 1983 complaint against Southern Correctional Institution and Cumberland County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
21 views1 page

James Rodney Smith v. Southern Correctional Institution Cumberland County Sheriff's Department, 73 F.3d 358, 4th Cir. (1996)

James Rodney Smith filed a Section 1983 complaint against Southern Correctional Institution and Cumberland County Sheriff's Department. The district court denied relief. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error. The Fourth Circuit dispensed with oral argument as the facts and legal issues were adequately presented in the materials before the court.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

73 F.

3d 358
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

James Rodney SMITH, Plaintiff-Appellant,


v.
SOUTHERN CORRECTIONAL INSTITUTION; Cumberland
County
Sheriff's Department, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6994.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Dec. 14, 1995.
Decided: Jan. 4, 1996.

James Rodney Smith, Appellant Pro Se.


Before ERVIN, Chief Judge, and WIDENER and WILKINS, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Smith v. Southern Correctional Inst., No. CA95-247-5-CT-BO (E.D.N.C. June 9, 1995). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like