Scribd
Upload
15 views1 page

United States v. Dorothy Lee Parrish, 846 F.2d 75, 4th Cir. (1988)

The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from April 29, 1988 regarding an appeal by Dorothy Lee Parrish of a district court's refusal of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, relying on the reasoning provided in an earlier district court case from October 27, 1987.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
15 views1 page

United States v. Dorothy Lee Parrish, 846 F.2d 75, 4th Cir. (1988)

The document is an unpublished court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit from April 29, 1988 regarding an appeal by Dorothy Lee Parrish of a district court's refusal of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The court affirmed the lower court's judgment, relying on the reasoning provided in an earlier district court case from October 27, 1987.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

846 F.

2d 75
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Dorothy Lee PARRISH, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-7382.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted April 7, 1988.
Decided April 29, 1988.

Dorothy Lee Parrish, appellant pro se.


N. George Metcalf, Assistant U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, WIDENER, and K.K. HALL, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order refusing relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. United States v. Parrish, CR-85-43-R (E.D.Va. Oct. 27,
1987).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like