Scribd
Upload
20 views1 page

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document is an unpublished court case from 1995 in which James T. Miller filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several doctors and nurses which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
20 views1 page

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit

The document is an unpublished court case from 1995 in which James T. Miller filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against several doctors and nurses which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error without requiring oral arguments as the facts and legal issues were clearly presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

66 F.

3d 316

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit Local Rule 36(c) states that citation


of unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
James T. MILLER, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Doctor IBARRA; Doctor Habeeb; F. Clark, RN; L. Chambless,
RN; E. Cochran, RN; Doctor Hipol; P. Edge,
Warden St. B.C.C., Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6686.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Sept. 14, 1995.

James T. Miller, Appellant Pro Se.


Before WIDENER, HALL, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Miller v. Ibarra, No. CA-94-1465-AM (E.D.Va.
Apr. 3, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like