0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views2 pages

United States v. Felsenberg, 4th Cir. (1998)

This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The appellant, Stanley Zvi Felsenberg, sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's rulings and reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
61 views2 pages

United States v. Felsenberg, 4th Cir. (1998)

This document is an unpublished opinion from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland. The appellant, Stanley Zvi Felsenberg, sought to appeal the district court's denial of his motion under 28 U.S.C. § 2255 and denial of his motion for reconsideration. The Fourth Circuit found no reversible error in the district court's rulings and reasoning. Accordingly, the Fourth Circuit denied a certificate of appealability and dismissed the appeal based on the reasoning of the district court.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS


FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 97-6939

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,


Plaintiff - Appellee,
versus
STANLEY ZVI FELSENBERG,
Defendant - Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of
Maryland, at Baltimore.
Frederick N. Smalkin, District Judge.
(CR-95-408-S, CA-97-1872-S)
Submitted:

January 22, 1998

Decided:

February 4, 1998

Before WIDENER, MICHAEL, and MOTZ, Circuit Judges.


Dismissed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Stanley Zvi Felsenberg, Appellant Pro Se. Virginia B. Evans, OFFICE
OF THE UNITED STATES ATTORNEY, Baltimore, Maryland, for Appellee.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.
See Local Rule 36(c).

PER CURIAM:
Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's orders denying
his motion filed under 28 U.S.C.A. 2255 (West 1994 & Supp. 1997)
and denying his motion for reconsideration. We have reviewed the
record and the district court's opinion and orders and find no
reversible error. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of appealability and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
United States v. Felsenberg, Nos. CR-95-408-S; CA-97-1872-S (D. Md.
June 11 and 27, 1997). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional
process.

DISMISSED

You might also like