Scribd
Upload
14 views2 pages

United States v. Darryl Joseph Crawford, 846 F.2d 74, 4th Cir. (1988)

Darryl Crawford appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. Crawford and his wife both pled guilty to misprision of felony. Crawford received a three-year prison sentence while his wife received three years suspended and probation. Crawford argued he and his wife were equally culpable so he should not have received a harsher sentence. The court affirmed the denial, finding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. As the issues were recently decided, the court dispensed with oral argument.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
14 views2 pages

United States v. Darryl Joseph Crawford, 846 F.2d 74, 4th Cir. (1988)

Darryl Crawford appealed the denial of his motion to reduce his sentence. Crawford and his wife both pled guilty to misprision of felony. Crawford received a three-year prison sentence while his wife received three years suspended and probation. Crawford argued he and his wife were equally culpable so he should not have received a harsher sentence. The court affirmed the denial, finding the district court did not abuse its discretion in denying the motion. As the issues were recently decided, the court dispensed with oral argument.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

846 F.

2d 74
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Darryl Joseph CRAWFORD, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 87-7747.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 24, 1988.
Decided April 29, 1988.

Darryl Joseph Crawford, appellant pro se.


Kieran Joseph Shanahan, Assistant U.S. Attorney, for appellee.
Before MURNAGHAN, SPROUSE, and CHAPMAN, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Darryl Crawford, a federal inmate, appeals from the district court's denial of his
motion for a reduction of sentence made pursuant to Fed.R.Crim.P. 35(b).
Crawford and his wife, Roberta, each pled guilty to a violation of 18 U.S.C.
Sec. 4, misprision of felony. Crawford received a three-year prison term while
his wife received a three-year suspended sentence and was placed on probation
in the care of a community treatment center. Crawford contends that since he
and his wife were equally culpable, he should not have received a more severe
sentence.

A motion for reduction of sentence is addressed to the sound discretion of the


district court; its judgment will not be disturbed absent a clear abuse of that
discretion. United States v. Stumpf, 476 F.2d 945 (4th Cir.1973). Our

examination of the record indicates that the district court did not abuse its
discretion in denying the motion in this case.
3

Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we


dispense with oral argument and affirm the district court's order.

AFFIRMED.

You might also like