0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views1 page

James Louis Jones v. W. P. Rogers, Warden, 829 F.2d 35, 4th Cir. (1987)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where James Louis Jones filed a Section 1983 civil rights claim against W.P. Rogers, the warden. The district court denied relief to Jones. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision without oral argument, finding the issues had been authoritatively decided previously.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
19 views1 page

James Louis Jones v. W. P. Rogers, Warden, 829 F.2d 35, 4th Cir. (1987)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where James Louis Jones filed a Section 1983 civil rights claim against W.P. Rogers, the warden. The district court denied relief to Jones. The appellate court affirmed the lower court's decision without oral argument, finding the issues had been authoritatively decided previously.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

829 F.

2d 35
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
James Louis JONES, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
W. P. ROGERS, Warden, Defendant-Appellee.
No. 87-7139

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted July 7, 1987.
Decided September 4, 1987.

James Louis Jones, appellant pro se.


Mark R. Davis, Office of the Attorney General of Virginia, for appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

A review of the record and the district court's opinion discloses that this appeal
from its order denying relief under 42 U.S.C. Sec. 1983 is without merit.
Because the dispositive issues recently have been decided authoritatively, we
dispense with oral argument and affirm the judgment below on the reasoning of
the district court. Jones v. Rogers, C/A No. 86-197-AM (E.D. Va., April 20,
1987).

AFFIRMED.

You might also like