0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Malcolm Reese v. P. Douglas Taylor, Warden, L.C.I. Attorney General of South Carolina, 16 F.3d 411, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Malcolm Reese, the petitioner. The district court had denied relief on Reese's petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254, and the appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Reese v. Taylor, No. CA-92-3185-3-8AJ.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
18 views2 pages

Malcolm Reese v. P. Douglas Taylor, Warden, L.C.I. Attorney General of South Carolina, 16 F.3d 411, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit dismissing an appeal from Malcolm Reese, the petitioner. The district court had denied relief on Reese's petition under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2254, and the appeals court found the appeal to be without merit after reviewing the record and district court opinion. The appeals court denied a certificate of probable cause to appeal and dismissed the case based on the reasoning provided by the district court in Reese v. Taylor, No. CA-92-3185-3-8AJ.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

16 F.

3d 411
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

Malcolm REESE, Petitioner-Appellant,


v.
P. Douglas TAYLOR, Warden, L.C.I.; Attorney General of
South Carolina, Respondents-Appellees.
No. 93-6916.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Dec. 16, 1993.
Decided Jan. 11, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of South
Carolina, at Columbia. Solomon Blatt, Jr., Senior District Judge. (CA-923185-3-8AJ).
Malcolm Reese, appellant pro se.
Donald John Zelenka, Chief Deputy Attorney General, Columbia, SC, for
appellees.
D.S.C.
DISMISSED.
Before HALL and NIEMEYER, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant seeks to appeal the district court's order denying relief on his 28
U.S.C. Sec. 2254 (1988) petition. Our review of the record and the district
court's opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses
that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we deny a certificate of probable

cause to appeal and dismiss the appeal on the reasoning of the district court.
Reese v. Taylor, No. CA-92-3185-3-8AJ (D.S.C. Aug. 5, 1993). We dispense
with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not aid the
decisional process.
2

DISMISSED.

You might also like