0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views2 pages

Norman Wilson Ryman v. John Wouldridge Debbora Jackson Brenda Banks, 958 F.2d 368, 4th Cir. (1992)

Norman Wilson Ryman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against three defendants which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding Ryman's appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Ryman's claim.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
44 views2 pages

Norman Wilson Ryman v. John Wouldridge Debbora Jackson Brenda Banks, 958 F.2d 368, 4th Cir. (1992)

Norman Wilson Ryman filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claim against three defendants which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling without oral argument, finding Ryman's appeal to be without merit. The Fourth Circuit adopted the reasoning of the district court in denying Ryman's claim.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

958 F.

2d 368

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Norman Wilson RYMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
John WOULDRIDGE; Debbora Jackson; Brenda Banks,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 91-7726.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted March 2, 1992.
Decided March 16, 1992.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Frederic N. Smalkin, District Judge. (CA-91-3139)
Norman Wilson Ryman, appellant pro se.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before SPROUSE and WILKINSON, Circuit Judges, and CHAPMAN,
Senior Circuit Judge.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

Norman Wilson Ryman appeals from the district court's order denying relief
under 42 U.S.C. 1983 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Ryman v. Wouldridge, No. CA-91-3139

(D.Md. Nov. 7, 1991). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and
legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like