Scribd
Upload
39 views2 pages

United States v. Wayne Royshel Davis, 962 F.2d 8, 4th Cir. (1992)

Wayne Royshel Davis appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning as outlined in United States v. Davis, No. CR-85-100-HM, CA-91-3541-HM (D. Md. Mar. 18, 1992) and found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
39 views2 pages

United States v. Wayne Royshel Davis, 962 F.2d 8, 4th Cir. (1992)

Wayne Royshel Davis appealed a district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The Fourth Circuit affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal lacked merit. The Fourth Circuit agreed with the district court's reasoning as outlined in United States v. Davis, No. CR-85-100-HM, CA-91-3541-HM (D. Md. Mar. 18, 1992) and found oral arguments were not necessary as the relevant facts and legal issues were adequately explained in the court materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

962 F.

2d 8

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Wayne Royshel DAVIS, Defendant-Appellant.
No. 92-6342.

United States Court of Appeals,


Fourth Circuit.
Submitted: May 4, 1992
Decided: May 21, 1992

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Herbert F. Murray, Senior District Judge. (CR-85-100-HM,
CA-91-3541-HM)
Wayne Royshel Davis, Appellant Pro Se.
Susan Moss Ringler, Office of the United States Attorney, Baltimore,
Maryland, for Appellee.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before HALL, WILKINS, and WILLIAMS, Circuit Judges.
OPINION
PER CURIAM:

Wayne Royshel Davis appeals from the district court's order refusing relief
under 28 U.S.C. 2255 (1988). Our review of the record and the district court's

opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on


the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Davis, No. CR-85-100-HM,
CA-91-3541-HM (D. Md. Mar. 18, 1992). We dispense with oral argument
because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the
materials before the Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like