Scribd
Upload
22 views2 pages

Craig Sanders Boone v. Travis Outlaw William Hendrix Talmadge L. Barnett William A. Dudley, 50 F.3d 5, 4th Cir. (1995)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Craig Sanders Boone filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Travis Outlaw and other defendants that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments are clearly presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
22 views2 pages

Craig Sanders Boone v. Travis Outlaw William Hendrix Talmadge L. Barnett William A. Dudley, 50 F.3d 5, 4th Cir. (1995)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Craig Sanders Boone filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against Travis Outlaw and other defendants that was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling without needing oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments are clearly presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

50 F.

3d 5

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
Craig Sanders BOONE, Plaintiff-Appellant,
v.
Travis OUTLAW; William Hendrix; Talmadge L. Barnett;
William A. Dudley, Defendants-Appellees.
No. 94-7209.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: January 19, 1995
Decided: February 17, 1995

Craig Sanders Boone, Appellant Pro Se.


Sylvia Hargett Thibaut, Assistant Attorney General, LaVee Hamer
Jackson, Office of the Attorney General of North Carolina, Raleigh, NC,
for Appellees.
Before WILKINS and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and SPROUSE, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion accepting the recommendation of the magistrate judge discloses that
this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. Boone v. Outlaw, No. CA-92-143 (E.D. Va. Oct. 4, 1994). We
dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are
adequately presented in the materials before the Court and argument would not
aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

You might also like