0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views2 pages

United States v. Richard A. Bryant, A/K/A R.P., A/K/A Rick, 927 F.2d 597, 4th Cir. (1991)

This document is an unpublished court case from 1991 in which Richard A. Bryant appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Bryant's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its November 30, 1990 decision.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
23 views2 pages

United States v. Richard A. Bryant, A/K/A R.P., A/K/A Rick, 927 F.2d 597, 4th Cir. (1991)

This document is an unpublished court case from 1991 in which Richard A. Bryant appealed the district court's denial of relief under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. The Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals affirmed the district court's ruling, finding no merit to Bryant's appeal. The Fourth Circuit affirmed based on the reasoning provided by the district court in its November 30, 1990 decision.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

927 F.

2d 597
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
Richard A. BRYANT, a/k/a R.P., a/k/a Rick, DefendantAppellant.
No. 91-6251.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Feb. 4, 1991.
Decided Feb. 25, 1991.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of
Virginia, at Norfolk. J. Calvitt Clarke, Jr., District Judge. (CR-87-100-N;
CA-90-1772-N)
Richard A. Bryant, appellant pro se.
Robert Joseph Seidel, Jr., Assistant United States Attorney, Norfolk, Va.,
for appellee.
E.D.Va.
AFFIRMED.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, SPROUSE and NIEMEYER, Circuit
Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Richard A. Bryant appeals from the district court's order refusing relief under

28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's opinion
discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. United States v. Bryant, CR-87-100-N, CA-901772-N (E.D.Va. Nov. 30, 1990). We dispense with oral argument because the
facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the
Court and argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like