United States v. Zisha Wajcman, 842 F.2d 1293, 4th Cir. (1988)
United States v. Zisha Wajcman, 842 F.2d 1293, 4th Cir. (1988)
2d 1293
Unpublished Disposition
On January 16, 1987, Wajcman returned to Southern Gun World and attempted
to cash a check for $750.00. Furniss refused to cash it because it was made out
to someone other than Thomas Whiteman. The next day, Wajcman purchased
three handguns from Bob Moats Sportshop in Chesterfield County. He used a
different Virginia driver's license identifying him as Thomas Grover Whalen,
710 North Washington Street, Alexandria, Virginia, to fill out form 4473. On
January 18, Wajcman returned to Virginia Police Equipment Company and
purchased ten handguns from Weiss. To make this purchase, he used the
Whalen license with its Alexandria address.
Finally, on January 19, Wajcman made a third visit to Southern Gun World and
unsuccessfully attempted to cash the $750.00 check again. Virginia State
Trooper Larry Thompson observed this event and had a license check run on
Wajcman's car after he left. Later that morning, Trooper Thompson saw
Wajcman again at the area office of the state police where he was trying to
acquire a second form of identification. After following him to the parking lot,
Thompson asked for his license. Wajcman did not produce one, but identified
himself as Thomas Whalen. Further investigation and a search of his car
yielded thirteen firearms, a variety of papers and identification, and several
yellow pages torn from a telephone directory which contained ads for firearms
dealers. Wajcman was indicted on four counts for making false statements
intended to deceive a licensed firearms dealer.
presented no evidence.
6
On appeal, Wajcman argues that the government failed to prove that the
Alexandria address he used for the two January purchases was false. The
government counters that residency, not address, is the material fact, and that
the evidence of a New York residence was sufficient to show a false statement.
Wajcman also asserts two evidentiary errors.
18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(a)(6)1 prohibits buyers from making false statements that
are material to the lawfulness of a firearm purchase. The material fact involved
in this case is the residency of Wajcman, not his address. See United States v.
Benton, 329 F.Supp. 331, 332 (D.N.H.1971); see also, United States v.
Behenna, 552 F.2d 573, 575-76 (4th Cir.1977) (proof of statement of false
address does not satisfy indictment charging statement of false residency).
Residence means the state in which a person has a regular home or place of
abode. United States v. Hawkins, 794 F.2d 589 (11th Cir.1986).
In this case, the government did not show that the Alexandria address was false.
It did show that Wajcman was not a Virginia resident by introducing evidence
showing that he was a New York resident. This included his address as listed
with the Immigration and Naturalization Service, the address where his social
security disability payments were sent, the address he used in registering at the
Royal Inn Motel in January 1987, and the address on various items found in his
car. The government also proved that the Richmond address he used in the two
August purchases was false, which strengthens the inference that he was not a
Virginia resident. Finally, there is nothing in the record that tends to show
Virginia residency. This evidence is sufficient for a rational trier of fact to find
beyond a reasonable doubt that Wajcman was not a Virginia resident in January
1987.
10
Wajcman asserts evidentiary errors in the admission of the "yellow pages" ads
found in the trunk of his car and testimony that the guns he bought were not
hunting weapons. Although the relevance of this evidence is limited, at best, so
is the prejudice. Any error regarding it is harmless.
11
The evidence is sufficient to show that Wajcman falsely stated his residency by
using a Virginia driver's license with an Alexandria address. Therefore, his
conviction under 18 U.S.C. Sec. 922(a)(6) is
12
AFFIRMED.