0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views1 page

Michael Lynn Brown v. K.L. Osborne, Warden James P. Kelly Richard A. Young, 56 F.3d 60, 4th Cir. (1995)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Lynn Brown filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error and affirming based on the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the court materials so no oral arguments are needed.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
31 views1 page

Michael Lynn Brown v. K.L. Osborne, Warden James P. Kelly Richard A. Young, 56 F.3d 60, 4th Cir. (1995)

This document is a court case summary from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. It summarizes a case where Michael Lynn Brown filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The Fourth Circuit affirms the district court's ruling, finding no reversible error and affirming based on the district court's reasoning. The facts and legal arguments are adequately represented in the court materials so no oral arguments are needed.
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

56 F.

3d 60
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

Michael Lynn BROWN, Plaintiff-Appellant,


v.
K.L. OSBORNE, Warden; James P. Kelly; Richard A. Young,
Defendants-Appellees.
No. 95-6229.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted April 20, 1995.
Decided May 26, 1995.

Michael Lynn Brown, Appellant Pro Se.


Before WIDENER, WILKINSON, and WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. We have reviewed the record and the district
court's opinion, and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm on the
reasoning of the district court. Brown v. Osborne, No. CA-95-44 (W.D.Va. Jan.
12, 1995). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal
contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED

You might also like