Scribd
Upload
24 views2 pages

United States v. John Richard Andrews, A/K/A John Stuart Andrew, 865 F.2d 1260, 4th Cir. (1989)

This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1989 affirming a district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court found the appeal was without merit and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the lower court's decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
24 views2 pages

United States v. John Richard Andrews, A/K/A John Stuart Andrew, 865 F.2d 1260, 4th Cir. (1989)

This document is an unpublished appellate court decision from 1989 affirming a district court's denial of a defendant's motion to vacate his sentence under 28 U.S.C. § 2255. The appellate court found the appeal was without merit and affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the facts and legal issues were adequately addressed in the lower court's decision.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

865 F.

2d 1260
Unpublished Disposition

NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of


unpublished dispositions is disfavored except for establishing
res judicata, estoppel, or the law of the case and requires
service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the Fourth
Circuit.
UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee,
v.
John Richard ANDREWS, a/k/a John Stuart Andrew,
Defendant-Appellant.
No. 88-7166.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted: Nov. 21, 1988.
Decided: Jan. 4, 1989.
Rehearing Denied Feb. 17, 1989.

John Richard Andrews, appellant pro se.


Robert Neal McDonald (Office of the United States Attorney), for
appellee.
Before DONALD RUSSELL, JAMES DICKSON PHILLIPS and
WILKINS, Circuit Judges.
PER CURIAM:

John Richard Andrews appeals from the district court's order refusing relief
under 28 U.S.C. Sec. 2255. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. United States v. Andrews, CR No. 84-362JH (D.Md. May 31, 1988). We dispense with oral argument because the facts
and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court
and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

You might also like