Scribd
Upload
18 views2 pages

David Bright v. Sewall Smith, Warden Paul Knight Joseph Zbozien, 37 F.3d 1492, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. David Bright filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the record and reasoning of the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
18 views2 pages

David Bright v. Sewall Smith, Warden Paul Knight Joseph Zbozien, 37 F.3d 1492, 4th Cir. (1994)

This document summarizes a court case from the United States Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit. David Bright filed a 42 U.S.C. § 1983 complaint against prison officials which was denied by the district court. The appeals court affirmed the district court's ruling, finding the appeal was without merit based on the record and reasoning of the lower court. The appeals court dispensed with oral arguments, as the facts and legal arguments were adequately presented in the case materials.

Uploaded by

Scribd Government Docs
Copyright
© Public Domain
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 2

37 F.

3d 1492
NOTICE: Fourth Circuit I.O.P. 36.6 states that citation of unpublished
dispositions is disfavored except for establishing res judicata, estoppel, or the law
of the case and requires service of copies of cited unpublished dispositions of the
Fourth Circuit.

David BRIGHT, Plaintiff Appellant,


v.
Sewall SMITH, Warden; Paul Knight; Joseph Zbozien,
Defendants Appellees.
No. 94-6796.

United States Court of Appeals, Fourth Circuit.


Submitted Aug. 25, 1994.
Decided Oct. 17, 1994.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Maryland,
at Baltimore. Edward S. Northrop, Senior District Judge. (CA-94-658)
David Bright, Appellant Pro Se.
John Joseph Curran, Jr., Audrey J. S. Carrion, Baltimore, MD, for
Appellees.
D.Md.
AFFIRMED.
Before RUSSELL and MICHAEL, Circuit Judges, and PHILLIPS, Senior
Circuit Judge.
PER CURIAM:

Appellant appeals from the district court's order denying relief on his 42 U.S.C.
Sec. 1983 (1988) complaint. Our review of the record and the district court's
opinion discloses that this appeal is without merit. Accordingly, we affirm on
the reasoning of the district court. Bright v. Smith, No. CA-94-658 (D. Md.
July 4, 1994). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal

contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the Court and
argument would not aid the decisional process.
2

AFFIRMED.

You might also like