Fingerprint
Fingerprint
1. Organisation
1.1
1.2
1.3
1.4
1/10
1.6
1.7
1.8
1.9
2/10
2. Quality Assurance
2.1
Deadline to achieve
Responsible
person for action
Project Group
November 2010
December 2010
Paul
Chamberlain
Chapters written
July 2011
August 2011
Project Group
and different
volunteers
Working Group
members
3/10
Five ten-print cards of suspects and 15 marks were sent out to the
participants including the request to process the material according to the
local SOPs. Independent of the number of latent print examiners which
worked on this task, only one consolidated answer per organisation was sent
back and assessed. For each mark, this answer included the following
information:
Degree of complexity.
Is there sufficient information for a comparison?
If applicable, result of the comparison based on the local standard:
identification, exclusion or inconclusive.
In case of an identification, information of person and finger/area of
palm.
2.3.2 Summary of the results from the Collaborative Exercises in 2010 and
consequent actions
The analysis of the EICE-2010 showed the following results:
1. Some participants (6 out of 29) returned answers with partly
contradictive information. Discussions showed that the definitions and
questions left some unexpected room for interpretation. This will be
improved in an upcoming exercise.
2. There were no false identifications made. Even though, the exercise
was not designed to force this kind of error.
3. 8 participants returned the correct results for all 15 marks.
4. 7 participants had at least one false exclusion. Overall, 14 marks were
excluded incorrectly. One participant excluded 4 marks incorrectly.
5. 18 participants had at least one missed identification. Overall, the
identification of 51 marks was missed. Three participants missed 5
identifications each.
These results were presented and discussed during the identification
workshop of the Fingerprint Working Groups annual meeting. We concluded
that there is a high demand for additional training and harmonisation in the
field of fingerprint identification on national as well as on international level.
Moreover, some valuable inputs were given to improve and strengthen the
organisational part of the exercise.
Deadline to
achieve
June 2011
Responsible
person for action
Cor Smakman
End of 2011
Chairperson ID
Subgroup and
WG members
4/10
2.5
Deadline
to achieve
Responsible
person for action
Deadline
to achieve
July 2011
Responsible
person for action
Didier Meuwly
5/10
3. Communication
3.1 ENFSI Website
3.1.1 ENFSI Website editor (incl. institute):
- Axel Glaeser, Swiss Federal Office of Police
Deadline to
achieve
April 2011
January 2011
September
2011
Responsible
person for action
Axel Glaeser
3.2 WG Newsletter
3.2.1 Editor (incl. institute):
- Monika Hilgert, Bundeskriminalamt Wiesbaden,
Germany
Deadline to
achieve
August 2011
Responsible
person for action
Monika Hilgert
Deadline
to achieve
Responsible
person for action
Chairperson
all members via
Chairperson or
Secretary
6/10
Deadline
to achieve
Responsible
person for action
7/10
Deadline to
achieve
September
2011
Responsible
person for action
Miroslav Berka
September
2011
Joanne Fish
8/10
5.2
5.3
Deadline
to achieve
May 2011
March
2011
Responsible
person for action
Irena Bialek
Aldo Mattei
9/10
Available Databases
none
6.2
6.3
Deadline
to achieve
First halfyear 2011
Responsible
person for action
Chairperson or
other member
SC
Chairperson and
other WGmembers
June 2011
July 2011
open
open
10/10