0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views

LP Examples 2016

The document provides optimization results from Microsoft Excel for Holly's Hot Tubs business. It includes the optimal solution that maximizes total profits of $66,100 by producing 122 Aqua-Spas and 78 Hydro-Luxes. It also lists the final values and statuses of the constraints for pumps, labor, and tubing required. Sensitivity analysis shows the allowable increases and decreases to the objective and right-hand sides of the constraints.

Uploaded by

anxhela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
76 views

LP Examples 2016

The document provides optimization results from Microsoft Excel for Holly's Hot Tubs business. It includes the optimal solution that maximizes total profits of $66,100 by producing 122 Aqua-Spas and 78 Hydro-Luxes. It also lists the final values and statuses of the constraints for pumps, labor, and tubing required. Sensitivity analysis shows the allowable increases and decreases to the objective and right-hand sides of the constraints.

Uploaded by

anxhela
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 26

Microsoft Excel 14.

6 Answer Report
Worksheet: [LP Examples 2016.xlsx]Holly
Report Created: 9/6/2016 7:46:57 PM
Result: Solver found a solution. All constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.497487 Seconds.
Iterations: 2 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Solve Without Integer Constraints, Ass

Objective Cell (Max)


Cell
Name
$D$6 Unit Profits: Total Profit:

Original Value
$66,100

Variable Cells
Cell
Name
Original Value
$B$5 Number to make: Aqua-Spas
122
$C$5 Number to make: Hydro-Luxes
78

Constraints
Cell
Name
$D$9 Pumps Req'd: Used
$D$10 Labor Req'd: Used
$D$11 Tubing Req'd: Used

Final Value
$66,100

Final Value
Integer
122 Contin
78 Contin

Cell Value
Formula
Status
Slack
200 $D$9<=$E$9 Binding
0
1566 $D$10<=$E$10 Binding
0
2712 $D$11<=$E$11 Not Binding
168

hout Integer Constraints, Assume NonNegative

Microsoft Excel 14.6 Sensitivity Report


Worksheet: [LP Examples 2016.xlsx]Holly
Report Created: 9/6/2016 7:46:58 PM

Variable Cells
Final
Cell
Name
Value
$B$5 Number to make: Aqua-Spas
122
$C$5 Number to make: Hydro-Luxes
78

Reduced
Cost

Objective Allowable Allowable


Coefficient Increase
Decrease
0
350
100
50
0
300
50 66.666666667

Constraints
Cell
Name
$D$9 Pumps Req'd: Used
$D$10 Labor Req'd: Used
$D$11 Tubing Req'd: Used

Final
Shadow
Constraint Allowable
Value
Price
R.H. Side Increase
200
200
200
7
1566 16.666666667
1566
234
2712
0
2880 1.00E+030

Allowable
Decrease
26
126
168

Microsoft Excel 14.6 Limits Report


Worksheet: [LP Examples 2016.xlsx]Holly
Report Created: 9/6/2016 7:47:02 PM

Objective
Cell
Name
$D$6 Unit Profits: Total Profit:

Value
$66,100

Variable
Cell
Name
Value
$B$5 Number to make: Aqua-Spas
122
$C$5 Number to make: Hydro-Luxes
78

Lower Objective
Limit Result
0 $23,400
0 $42,700

Upper Objective
Limit Result
122 $66,100
78 $66,100

Holly

Holly's Hot Tubs


Aqua-Spas Hydro-Luxes
Number to make:
122
78
Total Profit:
Unit Profits:
$350
$300
$66,100
Constraints:
Pumps Req'd:
Labor Req'd:
Tubing Req'd:

1
9
12

1
6
16

Used
200
1566
2712

Page 5

Available
200
1566
2880

Holly's Hot Tubs


Number to make:
Unit Profits:
Constraints:
Pumps Req'd:
Labor Req'd:
Tubing Req'd:

Aqua-Spas

Hydro-Luxes

Typhoon-Lagoons

$350

$300

$320

1
9
12

1
6
16

1
8
13

Total Profit:
Used

Available
200
1566
2880

Fabric
Glen plaid
Flannel
Gaberdine
Hours Available

Dobbie
Regular
Capacity
Capacity
Dobbie Mill Regular Mill Outsourcing
(yards/hour) (yards/hour) Cost ($/yard) Cost ($/yard) Cost ($/yard)
4.7
0
$0.65
$0.65
$0.85
5.2
5.2
$0.61
$0.61
$0.75
4.4
4.4
$0.50
$0.50
$0.65
6,552
32,760

Glen plaid
Flannel
Gaberdine
Hours Used

on Dobbie
30794.4
0
0
6,552

Total Cost

$83,756.12

on Regular
0
76500
10000
16,984

Purchased
14205.6
0
0

Total Yards
Produced
45,000
76,500
10,000

Deman
d
(yards)
45,000
76,500
10,000

Feed 1
Feed 2
Unit Cost
$250
$300
Units to Mix
4.5
2
(Note: 1 unit = 1,000 pounds)

Nutrient
Corn
Grain
Minerals

Feed 3
$320
0

Feed 4
$150
1.5

Percent of Nutrient in
Feed 1
Feed 2
Feed 3
Feed 4
30%
5%
20%
10%
10%
30%
15%
10%
20%
20%
20%
30%

Total
$1,950
8

Units Req'd
8

Amount
Minimum
in BlendReq'd Amount
20.00%
20%
15.00%
15%
21.88%
15%

ts Req'd

d Amount

Selling Price ($/lb

Special

Mountain Dark

Rainforest

$6.50

$5.25

$3.75

Marginal Profit ($/lb)


Brazilian
mocha
Colombian
mild
Decision Variables
Coffee in each Blend (lbs)
Brazilian
mocha
Colombian
mild
Total

Constraints
Brazilian
mocha
Colombian
mild

>=40%Colombian

>=60%Brazilian

<=60%Mild

<=10%Mild

>=30%Brazilian

0.00
>=30%Mocha
Brazilian
mocha
Colombian
mild
0.00

Total

Cost ($/lb)
$2.00
$2.75
$2.90
$1.70

Used

Available
110
70
80
150

Shift
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
Scheduled
Required

Sun
0
1
1
1
1
1
0
18
18

Mon
0
0
1
1
1
1
1
27
27

Tue
1
0
0
1
1
1
1
24
22

Days On = 1, Days Off = 0

Wed
1
1
0
0
1
1
1
27
26

Thu
1
1
1
0
0
1
1
26
25

Fri
1
1
1
1
0
0
1
24
21

Sat
1
1
1
1
1
0
0
19
19

Workers
Schedule
d
3.00
3.00
6.00
0.00
7.00
2.00
12.00

Total Wag

Wages
per
Worke
r
$680
$705
$705
$705
$705
$680
$655

$22,540

integrer means that we don't get any decimals

Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic)

Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Monthly
Demand (000
units)

Demand City
Production & Transportation Cost per 1,000 Units
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver
Omaha
$1,675
$400
$685
$1,630
$1,160
$1,460
$1,940
$970
$100
$495
$1,925
$2,400
$1,425
$500
$950
$380
$1,355
$543
$1,045
$665
$922
$1,646
$700
$508
$311
10

14

Decision Variables
Demand City - Production Allocation (1,000 Units)
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Total Received

Atlanta
0
0
0
10
0
10

Total Cost

$26,463

Boston
8
0
0
0
0
8

Chicago
2
0
0
12
0
14

Denver
0
6
0
0
0
6

Omaha
0
0
0
0
7
7

000 Units
Portland
$2,800
$1,200
$800
$2,321
$1,797

Monthly
Capacity
(000
units)
18
24
27
22
31

11
It's ok to have extra capacity. The problem is if you don't have capacity

0 Units)
Portland
0
0
11
0
0
11

Supplied
(Shipped
Out)
10
If we6 dont have extra capacity (demand > Total capacity) then we can change
11
22
7

u don't have capacity

) then we can change Demand=< and capacity =

Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic)

Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Monthly
Demand (000
units)

Demand City
Production & Transportation Cost per 1,000 Units
Atlanta
Boston
Chicago
Denver
Omaha
$1,675
$400
$685
$1,630
$1,160
$1,460
$1,940
$970
$100
$495
$1,925
$2,400
$1,425
$500
$950
$380
$1,355
$543
$1,045
$665
$922
$1,646
$700
$508
$311
10

14

Decision Variables
Demand City - Production Allocation (1,000 Units)
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Total Received

Atlanta
0
0
0
10
0
10

Total Cost

$24,029

Boston
8
0
0
0
0
8

Chicago
0
0
0
12
2
14

Denver
0
6
0
0
0
6

Omaha
0
4
0
0
3
7

000 Units
Portland
$2,800
$1,200
$800
$2,321
$1,797

Monthly
Capacity
(000
units)
8
10
7
22
5

11
It's ok to have extra capacity. The problem is if you don't have capacity

0 Units)
Portland
0
0
7
0
0
7

Supplied
(Shipped
Out)
8
If we
10dont have extra capacity (demand > Total capacity) then we can change
7
22
5
This one is an example where demand > total capacity

u don't have capacity

) then we can change Demand=< and capacity =

mand > total capacity

Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic)


Demand City
Production & Transportation Cost per 1,000 Units
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Monthly
Demand (000
units)

Atlanta
$1,675
$1,460
$1,925
$380
$922

Boston
$400
$1,940
$2,400
$1,355
$1,646

Chicago
$685
$970
$1,425
$543
$700

Denver
$1,630
$100
$500
$1,045
$508

Omaha
$1,160
$495
$950
$665
$311

10

14

Decision Variables
Demand City - Production Allocation (1,000 Units)
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Total Received

Atlanta
0
0
0
10
0
10

Boston
8
0
0
0
0
8

Chicago
2
0
0
12
0
14

Total Cost
$47,813
SUMPRODUCT(B14:G18,B4:G8)+SUMPRODUCT(I4:I8,H4:H8)
variable cost + fixed cost
That is what goes on total cost before solver

Denver
0
0
6
0
0
6

Omaha
0
0
0
0
7
7

000 Units
Portland
$2,800
$1,200
$800
$2,321
$1,797

Monthly
Fixed
Cost
($000)
7,650
3,500
5,000
4,100
2,200

Monthly
Capacity
Plants
(000
(1=Open)
units)
1
18
0
24
1
27
1
22
1
31

11

0 Units)
Portland
0
0
11
0
0
11

Total
Supplied
10
0
17
22
7

Actual
Capacity
18
0
27
22
31

binary means either 0 or 1


when we have 2 variables put a comma

ables put a comma

Inputs - Costs, Capacities, Demands (for TelecomOptic)

Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Monthly
Demand

Atlanta
$1,675
$1,460
$1,925
$380
$922
10

Demand City
Production & Transportation Cost per 1,000 Units
Boston
Chicago
Denver
Omaha
$400
$1,940
$2,400
$1,355
$1,646
8

$685
$970
$1,425
$543
$700
14

$1,630
$100
$500
$1,045
$508
6

$1,160
$495
$950
$665
$311
7

Decision Variables
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita

Atlanta
0
0
0
1
0

Demand City Supplied (1 indicates Cities Supplied)


Boston
Chicago
Denver
Omaha
0
0
0
1
0

0
0
0
0
1

0
0
1
0
0

0
0
0
0
1

Resulting Production Allocation


Demand City - Production Allocation (1000 Units)
Supply City
Baltimore
Cheyenne
Salt Lake
Memphis
Wichita
Total Received

Atlanta
0
0
0
10
0

Boston
0
0
0
8
0

Chicago
0
0
0
0
14

Denver
0
0
6
0
0

Omaha
0
0
0
0
7

10

14

Total Cost

$49,717

0 Units
Portland
$2,800
$1,200
$800
$2,321
$1,797
11

pplied)

Fixed
Cost ($)

Capacity

$7,650
$3,500
$5,000
$4,100
$2,200

18
24
27
22
31

Portland

Plants (Yi)
(1=Open)

0
0
1
0
0

0
0
1
1
1

Portland
0
0
11
0
0

Totaled
Supplied
0
0
17
18
21

Units)

11

Actual
Capacity
0
0
27
22
31

You might also like