Developing Concepts in Physics Through Virtual Lab PDF
Developing Concepts in Physics Through Virtual Lab PDF
Abstract
For physics learning, labs plays very active and significant role as it is essential to develop concepts and principles
because students are continuously required to identify the hidden concepts, define and explain underlying laws and
theories using high level reasoning skills. It is time and again observed that traditional real time physics laboratory
has some limitations and problems in developing these concepts etc. In present given scenario of ICT, virtual lab
through computer simulation based method of teaching physics is emerging as one of the most powerful method of
experimentation in lab. The present study was conducted to see the effectiveness of virtual lab for developing concepts
in physics. The main purpose of this study was to investigate the effectiveness of Virtual Lab for students understanding
of concepts of physics. The findings of the present study clearly revealed that student learned concepts of photoelectric
effect through virtual lab in a better way as compared to real lab. The study also suggested the use of virtual labs in
physics teaching, especially for teaching of concepts.
Introduction
Physics is one of the most fundamental natural sciences which involve the study of universal law and the
behaviors and relationship among a wide range of physical concepts and phenomena. Experiments are the
hallmark of Physics. Scientific attitude and vision can be developed by allowing young minds to perform
experiments in physics lab and observe and understand the scientific phenomena to happen. Learning
through experiments encourages students to bring scientific thinking to the processes of strong, innovative
and logical path between concept and phenomena.
For physics learning, labs also plays very active and significant role as it is essential to develop concepts
and principles because students are continuously required to identify the hidden concepts, define and explain
underlying laws and theories using high level reasoning skills. Traditional laboratory has some limitation
and problems in developing these concepts etc. Todays traditional labs and the experiences acquired there,
because of certain limitations of their own , are not meaningful adequately for students and are not able to
make a significant contribution to conceptual understanding of students (Yager , Engen and Snider ,1969).
According to Hofstein (1988), students are performing experiments in the laboratory in a cookbook
approach which focused on development of low level science skills.
Manisha Bajpai
Zulkifli & Hassan(2009) studied problems during physics lab session. Results on problems encountered
during the physical lab session are presented (Figure-1).
17% of the students admitted on lack of skills in performing the experiments. Others agreed on lack of
preparation (16%), limited lab equipment (15%) and incompetent lab demonstrators (15%). These factors
may hinder them from successfully grasping the key concepts and knowledge expected from the experiments
performed.
In order to overcome these problems of traditional physics lab, search of a new philosophy in which learner
are actively constructing their own knowledge is needed. (Jonget 1998). In present scenario virtual lab
through computer simulation based method of teaching physics is an emerging powerful method of
experimentation in lab. The experiments, traditionally conducted in physical labs, can now be performed
on a computer through virtual lab.
44
To Study the effectiveness of achievement of above identify concepts and principles through virtual
lab compared to real lab.
45
Manisha Bajpai
Figure 2:
Table 1
Group
Gender
Total
Male
Female
Ccontrol
Experimental
15
17
10
08
25
25
Total
32
18
50
d. Tools employed
The present study employed following tools:
1.
2.
3.
e. Procedure in Brief
The step by step procedure of the followed in the present study can briefly be described as below:
1.
50 undergraduate students studying in fourth semester of Graduation in science were divided in two
groups based on their previous achievement marks in previous semester and their achievement was
evaluated by administered Pre test through an Achievement Test. For both groups were allowed to
perform the same experiment on photoelectric effect.
47
Manisha Bajpai
2.
Participants in the First group, designated as control group, were allowed to conduct experiment
under real lab situations. This group used real apparatus and materials about Photoelectric effect
(for example photocell, rheostat, power supply, ammeter, and voltmeter) in a conventional physics
laboratory
3.
Participants in the second group, designated as experimental group were provided the facilities of
virtual lab for conceptual understanding of photo electric effect. These participants used virtual apparatus
and material on a computer. For the study, a virtual laboratory atmosphere was created regarding
Experiment of Photoelectric Effect. To do that, it had been benefited from the Java Simulations.
4.
After completing the experiments in both the situations, students of both the groups was administered
Post Achievement Test to evaluate the conceptual understanding of photo electric effect after the
experiment and achievement gain was calculated.
5.
To study the effectiveness of virtual lab, the independent samples t- test, were used for testing the data
obtained in the study. The SPSS 11.00 (Statistical Package for Social Sciences) statistical program was used
to evaluate all the data collected from pre-and post-tests.
Findings
Statistical results about the comparison of pre-test and post-test scores of the experimental and the control
group students in the PAT are given in Table 2.
Table 2: Comparison of Achievement gain scores of students of the experimental group and control group
Group
X(Achievement gain)
Standard Deviation
df
Experimental
Control
25
25
02
15
2.02
2.73
48
12.66
0.001*
48
these studies with the present one may be due the nature of concept to be learned, approach of virtual lab
design, control of intervening variable, different design of the study and statistical analysis etc. Therefore,
some more such researches are needed to arrive at valid generalization.
Suggestions
1. According to research results, it may be suggested that using computer-simulation based virtual lab
like interactive physics, Phet interactive simulation, Crocodile Physic, Edison 4.0 helped students to
gain abstract concepts and so to increase students achievements. Moreover, use of these programs is
suggested by also other researchers (engel, zden & Geban, 2002; Yiit & Akdeniz, 2003; Grpeli,
2003; Bozkurt & Sarko, 2008).
2.
In view of time consuming and being expensive, deficiency of physics lab equipment, teachers
anxiety about the completion of the curriculum as stated in the study of Kurt (2002), these virtual lab
methods as stated above should be used.
3.
4.
Teachers are the implementers of technology based curriculum. Teachers should be given training
from time to time to make them aware about technological devices, effective use of these technological
devices especially computers, creating volunteerism in using them , developing positive attitude
towards technological devices and self-confident (Rohmer & Simonson, 1981; Okebukola, 1993;
McInerney & Sinclair, 1994; Francis-Pelton & Pelton, 1996; Gkda, 2003).
References
Aktan, B., Bohus, C., Crowl, L., and Shor, M.H., 1996. Distance Learning Applied to Control Engineering Laboratories. <http://www.ece.orst.edu/~aktanb/distancelabs. html> (1996) date of retrieval :15.4.2011
Arduino, P., Macari, E and Wyatt, T. 1999. Assessment of a Virtual Laboratory for Geotechnical Engineering,
Proceedings ASEEAnnual Conference and Exposition, Charlotte, North Carolina, Session 1620, (On CD ROM).
B. B. 1986. The Effects of Computer Assisted Instruction on Achievement and Attitudes of Underachievers in High
School Biology. Dissertation Abstracts Int , 47:1270-1278
Bagci, N. and Simsek, S. 1999. The influence of different teaching methods in teaching physics subjects on students
success, J Gazi Education Faculty. 19 :79-88.
Bekar, S. 1996. The influence of Lab Based Science Teaching on students success. Unpublished Master Thesis.
Ankara. Gazi University,Institute of Science
Bennett, R. 1986. The Effect of Computer Assisted Instruction and Reinforcement Schedules on Physics Achievement
and Attitudes Toward Physics of High School Students. Dissertation Abstracts Int, 46:3670A.
Bhandari, A and Shor, M. H. 1998. Access to an Instructional Control Laboratory Experiment through the World
Wide Web, Proceedings of the17thAmerican Control Conference, ACC98, Philadelphia, pp. 1319-1325.
Bryant, R. J. and Edmunt, A. M. 1987. They Like Lab-Centered Science. Sci Teacher, 54:42-45.
Budhu, M. 2000. Interactive Multimedia Web-based Courseware with Virtual Laboratories, Proceedings, Computers and advanced technology in Education, CATE, May 24 27, Cancun, Mexico, (On CD ROM).
Campbell. J. O., Asynchronous Laboratory Learning: Research and Field Trials On Simulated Engineering Education
Laboratories - Final Report. <http://olinc.vuse.vanderbilt.edu/elseval2.html> (1997) Davies,T.G., McColl, K.
nd McSporran, S., LabSim, URL:
Choi, B. and Gennaro, E. 1987. The Effectiveness of Using Computer Simulated Experiments on Junior High Students Understanding of The Volume Displacement Concept. J Res Sci Teac, 24: 539-552.
Clark, R. 1989. Developing Technical Training, Buzzards Bay Press, Phoenix, AZ..
49
Manisha Bajpai
Coleman, A., Smith, T.R., Mayer, R.E., and Buchel, O., 2001. Learning Spaces in Digital Libraries, Lecture Notes
in Computer Science 2163. Berlin: Springer-Verlag.
Cramer, P. G. and De Meyer, G., The Philosophy of the Virtual Laboratory. <http://www.vlabs.net/philos/vlart_g.html>
(1997) date of retrieval :15.4.2011
Drabenstott, K., Analytical Review of the Library of the Future,Council of Library Resources, Washington, DC.,
1994.
Edward, N. S., 1997. An Evaluation of Student Perceptions of Screen Presentations in Computer-based Laboratory
Simulations. European J Engg Edu 22 : 143-152
http://www.civil.gla.ac.uk)( date of retrieval missing)
Karweit, M, A Virtual Engineering/Science laboratory Course, Department of Chemical Engineering, John Hopkins
University., URL:http://www.jhu.edu/virtlab/virtlab.html. date of retrieval :15.4.2011
Mannix, M., The Virtue of Virtual Labs, Prism Online, September 2000. URL: http://www.asee.org/prism/sept00/
html/toolbox.cfm) date of retrieval :15.4.2011
Miller, D. G. 1986. The Integration of Computer Simulation into The Community College General Biology Laboratory. Dissertation Abstract Int, 47:2106-A.
zinar, Z. 1995. Evaluating the laboratory activities during Science Instructions at primary schools. Unpublished
Master Thesis Ankara University Social Science Institute,Ankara
Redish, F. E., Jeffery S. M., and Steinberg R. N. 1997. On the Effectiveness of Active Engagement Microcomputer
based laboratories. Department of Physics. University of Maryland College Park, MD20742 Reed,
Riche, R.D. 2000. Strategies for Assisting Students Overcome Their Misconceptions in High School Physics.
Memorial University of Newfoundland Education 6390.
Sen. A. I. 2001 New Approaches in Science Instruction supported with Computer J Gazi Education Faculty, 21 :
Sengel, E., zden, M. Y. and Geban, . 2002. The Influence of the simulated experiments supported with computer
on high school students comprehending the Replacement and Velocity concepts. V. National Science and
Mathematics Education Symposium .Ankara: ODT.
Soylu, H and Ibis, M. 1999. Science Education supported with Computer, 3rd Science Education Symposium. The
Ministry of Education. YGM.
Svec, M., T and Anderson, H., 1995. Effect of Microcomputer-Based Laboratory on Students Graphing Interpretation
Skills and Conceptual Understanding of Motion. Dissertation Abstracts Int, 2338-A.
Tamir, P. 1978. An Analysis of Laboratory Activities in Two Modern Science Curricula; Profect Physics and PSSC.
Paper Presented at the National Association for Research in Science Teaching Annual Meeting in Toronto,
Ontario. (date ?)
Uluinar, S., Cansaran, A. and Karaca, A. 2004. Evaluating the applications of Science Laboratory Trk Egitim
Bilimleri Dergisi ,2 :
Yavru, . 1998. The influence of the laboratory experiments on the success of the 4th and 5th graders of the primary
schools about the subject of Mechanics and on internalizing these concepts. Istanbul. Unpublished Master
Thesis. Marmara Universty, Institute of Educational Sciences
Yigit, N. and Akdeniz, A. R. 2000. Developing the Materials during Physics instructions supported with computer;
students working papers. IV. National Science Symposium, Hacettepe Education Faculty.Ankara: 711-716.
50