Annexure 7: Apparel Cad Evaluation Format: Section A: Questionnare Segment - I (Organization)
Annexure 7: Apparel Cad Evaluation Format: Section A: Questionnare Segment - I (Organization)
Section A : QUESTIONNARE
SEGMENT I (ORGANIZATION)
i.
ii.
iii.
How many times has the organization upgraded the CAD software or installed / changed
to a new one?
Once
Two - five times
Almost every year
Whenever required
SEGMENT II (PURPOSE)
i.
ii.
For what purpose/s is the CAD system being used? (Can be more than one)
Only for pattern making
For digitizing the patterns provided by buyers
Marker planning
Alterations in patterns
Grading
Others ( if required, pattern made only for special piece & checking )
iii.
ii.
iii.
Are experienced pattern makers (who manually developed patterns and markers) easily
accepting the extensive use of CAD / CAM?
Yes
No
Sometimes
iv.
SEGMENT- IV (TRAINING)
i.
Was any training imparted to the operator when the new soft-ware was installed?
Yes
No
If yes, then for how many days?
- Less than 7 days
- 7-15 days
- More than 15 days
Are you satisfied with the training given?
ii.
Yes
No
- Language problem
- Any other
Do you think that training is only required when a new software is installed or do you
recommend an in-house training otherwise as-well?
Training every year or 6-months
Only when a software is installed
iii.
iv.
Do you think that the person working on CAD / CAM should be well versed in Pattern
and Marker development or should he have fair knowledge about textile and styling aswell? Please Comment:
Yes, with that knowledge he/she can better analyze the product and calculate for the
consumption, quality and cost of making of the garment.
How many people are working in the pattern development and marker making
department?
Please specify, (approx.)
CAD operator-3
ii.
iii.
Has the number changed (increased / decreased) with the usage of CAD?
Reduced
Are the same
Cant say
What is the age of person working on CAD?
20-25 yrs.
25-35 yrs
Above 35 yrs.
SECTION B
The following factors have been identified to have an influence on adoption of CAD /
CAM.
(Kindly select the most appropriate option)
Factors
influencing
adoption of IT
Strongly
positive
Moderately Indifferen
positive
t
Moderately Strongly
negative
negative
High Price
YES
Reduces
dependence on
people
YES
Failed
installation in
other
organization
Collaborative
working
between various
employees,
supplier and
buyer is easier
YES
YES
Ability of
supplier to train
the users in our
organization
YES
Saves fabric
YES
The supplier
does not have an
office in the
location where
my organization
is situated
YES
Improves first
pass quality
product
YES
Reduces
throughput time
for product
assemble
Requirement of
constant training
YES
YES
Ready
availability of
literate
professionals
YES
Constant up
gradation of
system required
YES
Cant
say
SECTION C
This sheet will help you decide which system is best for your pattern development
department and organization. ( Even if you have one. )
Note: Simple instructions to fill in the form.
Mention the various CAD / CAM systems you are aware of in (*) columns
In the row below, mention how each of these systems came to your knowledge,
whether through your institute, buyers, pattern maker, the respective company, fairs
and exhibitions or some journals etc.
Mention the CAD system under the evaluating points of 1-7.evaluate by giving score
of 1-7 where 1 stands for best and 7 for the least.
Same number maybe given for more than one company if the features are felt to be
the same. The company scoring the minimum score as per your requirements should
be your choice for buying the CAD system.
In the last column, kindly mention the basis of your evaluating criteria. For ex., if you
have give 1 to a particular system and 3 to the other, kindly mention who / why you
made the decision.
Criteria
PAD
LECTR
A
ASTOR
(RED TREE)
Agency/journa
l
MORGA
N
GERBER
Industr
y
Institute
Industry
Respective
company
Piece geometry
identifications(points,
lines, notches,
orientations lines,
piece rotation line for
marker making)
Pattern design
functionsmeasurement
capabilities
Pattern design
functions-darts, pleats,
trace, cut, combine,
shrink, stretch, flip,
rotate patterns.
Pattern design
functions- seam
allowance definition,
corners, corner insert
Pattern grading
functions
Maker making
functions
Automatic marker
making functions
Software platforms
Outputs and
consumables
availability
Manuals
Communications
access with respect
internet compatibility
Customizing features
Cost implications
Interface capabilities
with other design
software
Plotting facility
TOTAL
48
49
46
45
29
SECTION D
ANALYZING USAGE OF VARIOUS FUNCTIONS IN THE CAD/ CAM SYSTEMS.
Note: Kindly tick mark in the relevant column and pen down any remark / comment related
to the point in the last column.
S.No.
Criteria
1.
Digitization
2.
3.
4.
On screen pattern
construction
Notches option
Dart manipulation
5.
6.
Grading tools
Size correspondence
7.
Specification sheet
development
YES
8.
Piece assembly
YES
9.
Variant tools
YES
10.
Marker planning
YES
11.
Plotting
12.
Piece rotation
YES
13.
Measurement
capabilities
Pattern Design
functions- Darts,
pleats, trace, cut,
combine, shrink,
stretch, flip, Rotate
pattern.
Removing and
adding patterns
YES
14.
15.
Always
Sometimes/
Occasionally
Rarely
Never
Additional
Comment
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
YES
Generally is
received from
the buyer
Mention the various CAD / CAM systems you are aware of in (*) columns
Mention the CAD system under the evaluating points of 1-7, evaluate by giving score
of 1-7 where 1 stands for simplest and 7 for the complicated.
Then compare the following system on the basis of the criteria mentioned with respect
to the manual pattern making methods also (Mention the rating in the appropriate
column.)
If a particular facility is not available in manual pattern making / CAD, mention NIL.
In the remarks column, kindly mention the basis of your evaluating criteria (If
possible). For ex., if you have given 1 to a particular system and 3 to manual pattern
development, kindly mention why you made the decision.
Criteria
Gerber
Lectra
PAD
NIL
2
1
3
2
2
3
7
NIL
Modifications of
pattern is very
simple to operate
in Gerber
Software platforms
Outputs and
consumables availability
Manuals / Books
Communications access
with respect internet
compatibility
1
1
3
2
2
2
NIL
3
2
1
2
2
2
2
2
NIL
NIL
1
2
2
2
2
3
NIL
NIL
Cost implications
Interface capabilities
with other design
software
Plotting facility
Marker Planning
Options (Piece rotation,
Ply and edges, direction
of pieces, quantity of
pieces and piece
adjustment command,
marker efficiency, fabric
width, etc.)
TOTAL
2
3
3
3
3
3
1
NIL
1
1
2
2
3
2
NIL
NIL
27
45
43
25
Any remarks: Gerber doesnt require any high skill or specialization for pattern
modifications or marker making and is highly compatible with the working environment of a
garment industry. It can be easily connected with Internet or other network and can be used
for various modifications level in making of a garment.