ProQC ExampleReport TS16949 Audit PDF
ProQC ExampleReport TS16949 Audit PDF
* Example Report *
North America
+1-813-252-4770
Latin America
+52-1-333-2010712
Europe & Middle-East
+49-8122-552 9590
Asia & Asia Pacific
+886-2-2832-2990
Email
[email protected]
www.proqc.com
Rev.
GUIDELINES
PURPOSE:
This audit checklist was created based on requirements defined in the following standards:
- ISO/TS 16949 standard
- AIAG Standard
The intent of the audit is to assess the compliance level of suppliers to these requirements, and to provide adequate
information to the client for use in business decisions.
SCORING:
Scores are assigned based on what is done for the Pro QC client regardless of what is done for other clients. For
example, if control plans are developed for other clients but not for the Pro QC client, the score must be NC. Scoring
must be explained to the supplier at the opening meeting.
Complies with the Requirements = C
Improvement Needed = I
Non-Conformance Found = NC
N/A = Does Not Apply
GUIDELINE FOR SCORING CONFORMANCE:
Each question is assessed for conformance to the requirements of the applicable standards, and the auditors
knowledge of the product and/or process This must be clear to the supplier at the opening meeting.
Complies with Requirements =
- Has objective evidence to support the question, and
- Has a written procedure (when required).
Improvement Needed =
- Has objective evidence, but procedure needs improvement.
- Has objective evidence, but no written procedure.
- Has written procedure, but is lacking some objective evidence to support the question.
Non-Conformance =
- No objective evidence to support the question (regardless of the procedure).
- Lacking some objective evidence and no written procedure.
RESULTS/RECOMMENDATIONS: (Automatically Calculated)
The score is based on the percent of questions that Complies with Requirements, percent that Needs Improvement,
and the percent that have a Non-Conformance. Each client should review how the supplier was evaluated for each
question and base their decisions on factors that are important to their organization and product(s).
AUDIT REPORT:
The following sections are completed by the auditor:
- Scope of the Audit
- Recommendations
- Strengths of the Supplier's Quality System and Manufacturing Process
- Opportunities for Improvement (Weaknesses in the Supplier's Quality System and/or Manufacturing Process)
RESULTS REVIEW WITH SUPPLIER:
The auditor should review the audit results with the supplier, but cannot provide the supplier a copy of the audit. The
audit is the property of the client.
CORRECTIVE ACTIONS:
It is recommended that the client request a corrective action (improvement plan) based on the results of the audit. The
improvement plan should include the following:
- Detailed description of action plan.
- Name of the person responsible for the improvement activity.
- Date when the improvement will be completed.
Rev.
SUMMARY
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
SUPPLIER'S INFORMATION
CLIENT'S INFORMATION
NAME : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ADDRESS : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CITY : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
COUNTRY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
PHONE : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
FAX : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
NAME : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
ADDRESS : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
CITY : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
COUNTRY: XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
PHONE : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
FAX : XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Title:
Title:
Title:
Title:
Title:
Mr./Mrs.
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXX
Email:
Email:
Email:
Email:
Email:
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Email:
Email:
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
Pro QC Personnel
Mr./Mrs.
Mr./Mrs.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Title:
Title:
XXXXXXXXXX
XXXXXXXXXX
AUDIT RESULTS =
Category
Complies ( C )
Needed
Improvement ( I )
Not-complies
(NC)
Not Applicable
(N/A)
92.93%
4. QUALITY
8 MEASUREMENT, ANALYSIS
7. PRODUCT
AND 6.
IMPROVEMENT
RESOURCE
REALIZATION
5. MANAGEMENT
MANAGEMENT
RESPONSIBILITY
MANAGEM
4. QUALITY MANAGEMENT SYSTEM
ENT
96.5%
91.67%
88.46%
91.89%
96.77%
5. MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
6. RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
3.5%
7.58%
11.54%
8.11%
3.23%
0.0%
0.76%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
1.8%
12.12%
0.00%
0.00%
0.00%
7. PRODUCT REALIZATION
Complies)()C)))
10%
20%
Needed)Improvement)()I)))
30%
40%
50%
60%
70%
Not3complies)(NC))
RECOMMENDATIONS
1
2
3
4
The system is well documented and implemented effectively. You could start or
continue business with this supplier.
The system is acceptable, with minor nonconformities noted. You could use this supplier
and keep pushing them for improvement.
System has several major issues noted. You could temporarily use this supplier and
request immediate corrective action in case of long-term business.
There are serious majors issues noted with this supplier that could impact your business.
This supplier will need significant time and resources to be compliant to requirements.
The best solution will be to source another supplier.
80%
90%
100%
Rev.
AUDIT REPORT
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Scope of Audit:
To evaluate the Quality Management System of the supplier.
Summary / Recommendations:
The audited factory is located in XXXXXX. The factory has approximately 500 to 600 people working full-time.
There are two various productions, with one already certified to ISO/TS 16949.
Tthe 2nd, XXXXXXXX, is ongoing in the process to be included in this certification before the end of this current year.
There is sufficient evidence demonstrating that the audited site has an effective QMS functioning according
to requirement of TS, with staff well trained in the maintenance of QMS. The factory has experience working with
world class track maker and various others clients which has enhanced to keep themselves at
the international standard level. The auditor has full confidence that this organization has enough capability to
overcome few improvements listed here below in order to further reduce quality risk.
Strengths:
1. The factory is TS certified, with the system controlled by well qualified people / auditors (12).
2. The people in charge of QM has clear understanding of PDCA and have evidences of their implementation.
3. Visualizing system to communicate with worker in the clear language of the importance of client.
4. Great history of cooperating with major world-class clients.
5. Adequate manufacturing area, well spaced and in good working condition.
6. Testing center with necessary equipment in place and calibrated, with tags.
7. Multi-functional team applied in the development of process (APQP / PPAP).
8. Excellent supplier management / control, with one supplier TS certified, two committed to complete within a couple
of months, 13 out of 21 ISO 9001 certified.
Opportunities for Improvement:
1. Quality objectives: KPIs should be updated and published on a monthly basis at various workshops.
2. Competence of people: Skill matrix should be defined and published at testing center.
3. Human resources: Must have a replacement staff, when key people are not available.
4. Management review input: Use PFMEA as input during management review meeting.
5. Predictive maintenance: Tool life circle time to be defined in the tooling CV.
6. Control of changes: Must specify a list documents that could be affected by specific changes.
7. Calibration: Should have a calibration program with an alert sign when approaching the expiration date.
8. Calibration: Internal calibration to be traceable to external source.
9. Recording: In-house calibration to be recorded by hand, not in the computer.
10. Calibration: Employees must have a plan when an equipment is found out of calibration or damaged.
11. Testing method: Could provide specific work instruction for some testing devices with images.
12. TS Certification: The organization should submit a plan for the completion of the TS certification of the
2nd facility to client, and keep them updated on the progress.
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
4
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
4.1
General Requirements
Has the organization established,
Evidences of this question can be demonstrated
documented, implemented and
throughout the audit.
maintained a QMS and continually
improved its effectiveness in accordance
with ISO/TS 16949:2009?
4.1q2a
4.1q2b
4.1q2c
4.1q2d
4.1q1
4.1q2e
4.1q2f
4.1q3
4.1q4
4.1q5
SCORE
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T4.1.1q1
4.2
4.2.1q1a
4.2.1q1b
4.2.1q1c
4.2.1q1d
4.2.1q1e
4.2.2q1b
4.2.2q1c
SCORE
Documentation Requirements
a) Review where it's written and note the doc, if
any.
b) Check if the QP/QO posted in a visible place
for all employee to view.
c) Take a photo.
a) Review the procedure master list and confirm Yes, the factory has about 26 procedures as
that all mandatory procedures are included.
guidelines for the implementation of QMS
b) Take a photo of the master list.
according to TS requirements, listed in QM,
page 35/36. SEE PHOTO #10.
a) Review the master list for record and confirm Yes, the factory has procedure for the
that all records monitored are included.
control of record (Q/YCQP2013-2011, Rev.
b) Take photo of the master list.
B/0.) There is a master list of ten pages
describing all Quality Record to save,
including saving place, and time. SEE
PHOTO #11.
Quality Manual
If any, is the scope of the quality
management system identified in the
QMS, including details of and
justification for exclusions?
ISO/TS 16949:2009, Art 4.2.2(a)
Check if doc numbers of procedures are written Yes, the QM contains references of
at relevant section of the QM to indicate
procedures/documents to use. The name of
appropriate procedure applied.
the procedures are written as link.
4.2.3
4.2.3q1
FINDINGS
Yes, incoming inspections are conducted
per random sampling. Suppliers are
selected per requirement, and are
evaluated on an annual basis.
4.2.2
4.2.2q1a
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Control of Documents
Yes, there is procedure for the control of
document (Q/YCQP-2012-2011). Checked
mold maintenance document (Q/YCQP3007-01-20XX) distributed in 20XX-03-13,
and has signature of related department.
Record are written in form (Q/YCQP-401202, A/0).
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
4.2.3q2a
4.2.3q2f
4.2.3q2g
T4.2.3.1q2
T4.2.3.1q3
FINDINGS
a) Check if there is visible "UNDER CONTROL" Yes, document has OBSOLETE stamp
stamp on new revised doc, and if there is
putted in the drawing, SEE PHOTO #12 of
"OBSOLETE" stamp on old rev. of same doc.
drawing Nb. SA14056-D as example.
b) Note doc. Nb reviewed and take photo of
those stamps if any.
4.2.3.1
T4.2.3.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
SCORE
Engineering Specifications
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
4.2.4
4.2.4q1
4.2.4q2
4.2.4q3
T4.2.4.1q1
5.1q1c
5.1q1d
5.1q1e
T5.1.1q1
SCORE
Review the procedure and note its doc. nb and Yes, the procedure (Q/YCQP2013-2011)
current revision.
provide guidelines for the control of records
listed in the masterlist.
5.1q1b
FINDINGS
Control of Records
What records exist that provide evidence
of conformity to requirements and of the
effective operation of the QMS? (Should
be reviewed throughout the audit)
ISO/TS 16949:2009, Art 4.2.4
MANAGEMENT RESPONSIBILITY
5.1
5.1q1a
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Management Commitment
Does top management communicate the
importance of meeting customer and
statutory and regulatory requirements to
the organization?
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
5.2
5.2q1
5.3q1b
5.3q1c
5.3q1d
5.3q1e
Read the quality policy and ask them to explain Yes, the contents of the quality policy
how the company measures them.
relevant to this factory are measurable with
KPIs defined, SEE PHOTOS #7 AND #8 for
the year 20XX. There is plan of how these
KPIs are monitored. SEE PHOTO #8.
5.4.2
Planning
5.4.2q1a
Quality Objectives
T5.4.1.1q1
SCORE
Quality Policy
Read the quality policy.
5.4
5.4.1q2
5.4.1
5.4.1q1
FINDINGS
Customer Focus
Has top management ensured that
customer requirements are determined
and met with the aim of enhancing
customer satisfaction?
5.3
5.3q1a
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Check if the quality objectives are hand signed Yes, quality objectives are also listed, with a
by all managers and published.
distribution to each department. SEE
PHOTO #7.
Check if the quality objectives are hand signed Yes, it is included. SEE PHOTO #8.
by all managers and published.
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
5.4.2q1b
5.5
T5.5.1.1q1
T5.5.1.1q2
T5.5.1.1q3
5.5.2q1a
5.5.2q1b
5.5.2q1c
T5.5.2.1q1
T5.5.2.1q2
SCORE
a) Check if there a document that describes the Yes, it is implemented accordingly and
flow for the communication of quality issues,
records are available.
and note the doc. nb / rev.
b) Check if a record of internal / external
complaints are maintained.
Check if there is a representative of the Quality Yes, each facility under this organization
Department in charge of quality for the whole
has responsibility of quality to ensure the
company. Note his/her name.
quality of product.
5.5.2
5.5.2q1
FINDINGS
Yes, following the procedure (Q/YCQP20102011), with responsibility under Manager of
Technical Department.
5.5.1
5.5.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
a) Check if there is a document as guideline to
handle any changes that could potentially
happen, note doc. nb / rev.
b) Check if the company has a reaction plan
with responsible for implementing changes.
Management Representative
C
a) Review the organization chart and the
position of MR, including report line.
b) Review his last report submitted to top
management (Is this signed by the MR?)
Yes, it is included.
C
Yes, it is included.
C
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
5.5.3
5.5.3q1
5.6.1q2
5.6.1q3
T5.6.1.1q1
T5.6.1.1q2
T5.6.1.1q3
SCORE
Management Review
Check records of last two management reviews Yes, reviewed the record of last
and compare status of improvement between
management review conducted in 20XX-12both.
22.
Verify records of last two management reviews. Record of review are checked for the year
20XX. Performance trends of the year 20XX
recorded in document ( Q/YCQP-4016-05,
B/0).
a) Verify if there is document specifying the type Yes, all inputs are included in the file
of input for the management review and note
Q/YCQP-4016-03 (a/0).
the doc. nb/ rev.
b)
Verify if all mandatory inputs are listed, and
include evidences for the last two management
review meeting.
Review input
5.6.3
5.6.3q1
a) results of audits,
b) customer feedback
c) process performance and product conformity
d) status of preventive and corrective actions
e) follow-up actions from previous management
reviews
f) changes that could affect the quality management
system, and
g) recommendations for improvement
T5.6.2.1q1
5.6.2
5.6.2q1
FINDINGS
Internal Communication
How is information regarding the
effectiveness of the QMS communicated
within the organization?
5.6
5.6.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Review Output
What decisions or actions have resulted
from management reviews for each of
the following?
a) improvement of the effectiveness of the quality
management system and its processes
b) improvement of product related to customer
requirements, and
c) resource needs
a) Verify if there is document specifying the type Yes, decision of output are listed in the form
of output for the management review, note the Q/YCQP-4026-02 (a/0).
doc. nb/ rev.
b)
Verify if all mandatory outputs are listed, and
with evidences for the last 2 management
review meeting.
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
6
6.1q1b
Evidence on question (See 6.2, 6.3, 6.4) will be The factory has all necessary workshops,
acceptable.
and equipment, including lab service. SEE
PHOTOS #5, #6, AND #17. TESTING
CENTER - SEE PHOTOS #18, #19, #20,
#21, #22.
6.2.2q1c
6.2.2q1e
T6.2.2.1q1
T6.2.2.1q2
T6.2.2.2q1
General
What are the education, training, skills
and experience required by this
job/task?
How does this person meet those
qualifications?
Verify if the factory has system for identification The factory has procedure (Q/YCQP2017of training need.
2011) for guideline for the identification of
training. Training are for new hiring people
and for annual training.
a) Verify if Autocad, Pro/EERP system or any The factory has identified specific design
similar system is applied for design personnel. software such as PRO / E, Autocad and
b) Note revision number of those design tools. solid work.
6.2.2
6.2.2q1b
6.2.1
6.2.2q1a
SCORE
Provision of Resources
What resources has the organization
provided to implement and maintain the
QMS and continually improve its
effectiveness?
6.3
6.2.1q1
FINDINGS
RESOURCE MANAGEMENT
6.2
6.1q1a
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Check the existence of the procedure, and note Yes, the record of training are available in
doc. nb / rev.
the document (Q/YCQP-4017).
C
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T6.2.2.2q2
T6.2.2.3q1
T6.2.2.3q2
T6.2.2.4q1
T6.2.2.4q2
T6.2.2.4q3
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
Select a few workers at the manufacturing area, By meeting, and posting of process files on
and ask them to show the defect part and
site as work instruction and red sign on
explain the consequence of this defective part. specify product/process characteristic. SEE
PHOTOS # 29 & #30.
6.3q1b
6.3q1c
a) Is there any questionnaire test for employee Yes, there is questionnaire test applied as
to evaluate their knowledge?
part of test exam. SEE PHOTO #26.
a) Visit the facility, specially the condition of how Yes. SEE PHOTO #5, #6 & #17.
product / material are stored.
b) Verify if the factory has a maintenance
program.
Infrastructure
6.3.1
T6.3.1q1
6.3
6.3q1a
SCORE
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T6.3.1q2
T6.3.1q3
a) Verify if there is a documented plan to handle Yes, there is contingency plan for labor
sudden short down in the planning, take photo shortage, key equipments failureetc.
of the plan.
b) Ask
if such situation happen, and what was the
impact.
c)
Does the contingency plan describe
responsibility?
T6.4.1q1
T6.4.2q1
7.1q3a
7.1q3b
PRODUCT REALIZATION
7.1
7.1q2
Work Environment
7
7.1q1
SCORE
Contingency Plans
6.4
6.4q1
FINDINGS
6.3.2
T6.3.2q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Where in the product realization process a) Verify if the step for the identification of product
do you determine the quality objectives requirements are planned.
and requirements for products?
b) Check if there a record as example of any
product.
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.1q3c
7.1q3d
7.1q4
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
The stage of verification, validation and
monitoring of production realization are
documented as project planning such as for
the case of project #198911-E. SEE
PHOTO #36.
What records exist showing that both the Check if there a record as example of any
realization processes and the product
product.
meet requirements?
7.1.1
T7.1.1q1
7.1.2
Acceptance Criteria
Where are acceptance criteria defined? Check a record of such acceptance criteria, and Acceptance criteria are defined for each
When required, does the customer
check if there is an evidence that it was approved stage as guideline to accept the completion
approve them?
by the customer.
of each stage
When attribute data sampling, is the
acceptance level zero defects?
7.1.3
T7.1.3q1
T7.1.4q3
T7.1.4q5
7.2.1q1c
Change Control
What process is there to control and
react to changes that impact product
realization?
Customer-Related Processes
7.2.1
7.2.1q1b
7.2
7.2.1q1a
Confidentiality
How does the organization ensure the
confidentiality of customer-contracted
products, projects under development,
and related product information?
7.1.4
T7.1.4q1
T7.1.2q1
T7.1.2q2
SCORE
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.2.1q1d
T7.2.1.1q1
7.2.2q1b
7.2.2q4
T7.2.2.2q1
7.3.1q2b
7.3.1q2c
Customer Communication
Procedure (Q/YCQP2021-2011), via
customer representative.
7.3.1
7.3.1q2a
7.3
7.3.1q1
SCORE
7.2.3
7.2.3q1
FINDINGS
Yes, it is included in the document
(Q/YQCP-4003-32-2012). SEE PHOTO
#14.
7.2.2
7.2.2q1a
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.3.1q3
T7.3.1.1q1
7.3.2
7.3.2q1a
7.3.2q2
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
Yes, responsibilities are well defined.
Example of part 198911-E, the plan is
documented in Q/YCQP4003-04.
SCORE
N/A
7.3.2q3
7.3.2.1
T7.3.2.1q1
7.3.2.3
N/A
Special Characteristics
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.3.3
7.3.3q1
T7.3.3.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
Not applicable.
T7.3.3.1q1
7.3.4
7.3.4q1a
SCORE
N/A
7.3.4q3
7.3.5
7.3.5q1
7.3.5q2
7.3.6q3
7.3.6
7.3.6q1
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T7.3.6.1q1
7.3.7
7.3.7q1
7.3.7q2
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
7.4
PURCHASING
Purchasing Process
7.4.1q2
7.4.1q3
7.4.1q4
7.4.1q5
T7.4.1.1q1
T7.4.1.2q2
SCORE
7.4.1
7.4.1q1
FINDINGS
Yes, the customer will conduct the
validation .
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T7.4.1.3q1
7.4.2
7.4.2q1a
7.4.2q1b
7.4.2q1c
7.4.2q2
T7.4.3.1q1
T7.4.3.2q1
7.5.1q1c
Yes, completed.
Yes, documented.
7.5.1
7.5.1q1b
SCORE
Purchasing Information
7.5
7.5.1q1a
FINDINGS
Yes, all information is included in the plan.
The factory has a written program to
monitor suppliers.
Do orders/contracts include
requirements for approval of product,
procedures, processes and equipment?
7.4.3
7.4.3q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.5.1q1d
7.5.1q1e
T7.5.1.1q2
T7.5.1.1q3
T7.5.1.1q4
T7.5.1.2q2
T7.5.1.3q2
C
Work Instructions
7.5.1.4
T7.5.1.4q1
7.5.1.3
T7.5.1.3q1
SCORE
Control Plan
Can you show me control plans for
system, subsystem, and component/
material levels for product supplied?
7.5.1.2
T7.5.1.2q1
FINDINGS
Yes, gages are available.
7.5.1.1
T7.5.1.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
C
Preventive and Predictive Maintenance
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T7.5.1.4q2
7.5.1.5
T7.5.1.5q1
T7.5.1.5q2
T7.5.1.5q3
T7.5.1.5q4
T7.5.1.5q5
T7.5.1.5q6
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
Accident occurrence are recorded in the
form Q/YCQP4006-08 and their root cause
is investigated in the form Q/YCQP-4006-06
(B/0). See example of machine #YC29.
Data collected are not properly used to
develop an efficient predictive action.
SCORE
C
T7.5.1.5q3
7.5.1.6
T7.5.1.6q1
Production Scheduling
Can you demonstrate that customer
scheduling requirements (such as just-intime) are being met?
7.5.3
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.5.4
7.5.4q1
7.5.4q2
T7.5.4.1q1
T7.5.5.1q2
7.6q2
7.6q3a
7.6q3c
7.6q3e
7.6q4
7.6q5
7.6q6
SCORE
Customer Property
Yes, the factory use customer drawing,
tooling as customer property.
N/A
7.6
7.6q1
FINDINGS
7.5.5
T7.5.5.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
NC
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
7.6q7
T7.6.1q1
T7.6.1q2
FINDINGS
SCORE
Can you show me R&R studies for each Is there other statistical studies analyzing the
type of measuring and test equipment
variation in measurement & test results?
system referenced in the control plan?
7.6.2
T7.6.2q3
T7.6.2q6
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
C
T7.6.2q7
7.6.3
T7.6.3.1q1
T7.6.3.1q2
T7.6.3.2q1
T7.6.3.2q2
Laboratory Requirements
Does the organization have an internal
laboratory?
If so, can you show a documented
laboratory scope including its capability
to perform inspection, test, or calibration
services?
Where
are laboratory technical
requirements specified for
- adequacy of laboratory procedures
- competency of the laboratory
personnel
- testing of the product,
- capability to perform these services
correctly, traceable to the relevant
process standard, and
- review of the related records
Have these requirements been
implemented?
Can you show me laboratory scope(s)
for external/commercial/independent
laboratory facilities that include the
capability to perform the required
inspection, test or calibration?
Can I see evidence that each laboratory
is either accredited, or is acceptable to
the customer(s)?
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
8
T8.1.1q1
General
Have appropriate statistical tools for
each process been determined and
included in the control plan? (See
7.5.1.1)
T8.2.1.1q1
8.2.2q2
8.2.2q3
8.2.2q4
8.2.2
8.2.2q1
8.2
T8.2.1.1q1
8.2.1
8.2.1q1
SCORE
8.1.1
T8.1.2q1
FINDINGS
8.1
8.1.1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Internal Audit
Are internal audits being conducted at
planned intervals? Do they determine
whether the QMS conforms to the
requirements of ISO 9001 and to the
other requirements established by the
organization? Do they determine
whether the QMS is effectively
implemented and maintained?
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
8.2.2q5
8.2.2q6
T8.2.2.1q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
SCORE
C
T8.2.2.2q1
T8.2.2.3q1
T8.2.2.4q1
T8.2.2.4q2
T8.2.2.5q1
Yes.
Yes.
8.2.3
8.2.3q1
8.2.3q2
8.2.3q3
T8.2.3.1q1
T8.2.3.1q2
N/A
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
T8.2.3.1q4
T8.2.3.1q5
8.2.4q2
8.2.4q3
FINDINGS
Yes, there are record that show that
process capability was evaluated and
approved by the client, thought PSW, see
the case of the client CVSG.
8.2.4
8.2.4q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
SCORE
C
8.2.4q4
8.2.4q5
T8.2.4.1q1
T8.2.4.2q1
Can you show me layout inspection and NOTE: Layout inspection is the complete
The layout inspection is documented. SEE
functional verification results?
measurement of all product dimensions shown on PHOTO #45.
Do they address applicable customer
the design records.
specifications and correlate with the
control plan requirements?
Are results available for customer
review?
Do you provide parts designated by
If so can you show that you have:
customer(s) as appearance items? If so, - appropriate resources including lighting for
what support to you have?
evaluation
- masters for color, grain, gloss, metallic brilliance,
texture, distinctness of image (DOI), as
appropriate
- maintenance and control of appearance masters
and evaluation equipment, and
- verification that personnel making appearance
evaluations are competent and qualified to do so
8.3
8.3q1
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
8.3q2
8.3q3
8.3q4
8.3q5
8.3q6
Customer Information
Do you have evidence that customers
are promptly notified if nonconforming
product is shipped?
No evidence saved.
I
Analysis of Data
8.4.1
T8.4.1q1
8.4
8.4q1
SCORE
8.3.3
T8.3.3q1
FINDINGS
The procedure Q/YCQP2024-2011 is
available and defines responsibilities.
8.3.2
T8.3.2q1
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
8.5
Improvement
8.5.1
Continual Improvement
8.5.1q1
T8.5.1.1q1
T8.5.1.2q1
8.5.2
8.5.2q1
8.5.2q2
8.5.2q3
8.5.2q4
T8.5.2.1q1
T8.5.2.1q2
T8.5.2.2q1
FINDINGS
SCORE
Corrective Action
Do corrective actions records identify
and address root cause(s)? Do root
causes match actions?
Yes. Verified.
8.5.2.4
C
Rejected Product Test/Analysis
Rev.
AUDIT CHECKLIST
Supplier Name
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
Audit Date
Report No.
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
C = Complies with the requirements, I = Improvement Needed, NC = Not Complies, N/A = Not Applicable
QUESTIONNAIRES
8.5.3
8.5.3q1
8.5.3q2
8.5.3q3
EVIDENCE TO CHECK
FINDINGS
SCORE
Preventive Action
How do you determine potential
nonconformities to take action one?
Do preventive action records identify and
address root cause(s)?
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
2. Process map
4. Organization
5. Stamping workshop
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
8. Distribution of KPIs
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
23. UV machine
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
28 Document
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX
Rev.
FACTORY PHOTOS
Supplier Name
Audit Date
Report No.
XXXXXXXXXXXXXXX
XX/XX/XXXX
XXXXXXXXX