Scribd
Upload
37 views1 page

Questions 6

The document discusses no-arbitrage relationships between different Coca-Cola bond structures and warrants. It asks how the value of a unit consisting of a note and warrant relates to a similar standalone note. It also asks how the embedded call option in one note structure relates to the warrant. Finally, it inquires about how these no-arbitrage relationships can be violated in the Eurobond market and how Coca-Cola may use any violations to its advantage.

Uploaded by

SZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
37 views1 page

Questions 6

The document discusses no-arbitrage relationships between different Coca-Cola bond structures and warrants. It asks how the value of a unit consisting of a note and warrant relates to a similar standalone note. It also asks how the embedded call option in one note structure relates to the warrant. Finally, it inquires about how these no-arbitrage relationships can be violated in the Eurobond market and how Coca-Cola may use any violations to its advantage.

Uploaded by

SZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Coca-Cola Harmless Warrants

Q1. What is the no-arbitrage relationship between the value of a unit (i.e., a 9 7/8%
Series A Note plus a warrant) and the value of a non-callable 9 7/8% Series B Note?
Q2. What is the no-arbitrage relationship between the call option embedded in the
Series A Note and the warrant?
Q3. How are the no-arbitrage relationships in Q1 and Q2 violated in the Eurobond
market?
Q4. What are the potential reasons for the violation of the no-arbitrage relationship
in the Eurobond market? How is Coca-Cola using this violation of the no-arbitrage
relationship to its advantage?
Hello!

You might also like