List of Cognitive Biases - Wikipedia PDF
List of Cognitive Biases - Wikipedia PDF
2 Social biases
Most of these biases are labeled as attributional biases.
Cognitive biases, categorized.
Illustration by John Manoogian III (jm3).[1]
Prospect theory
Mental accounting
Adaptive bias basing decisions on limited information and biasing them based on the costs
of being wrong.
Attribute substitution making a complex, dicult
judgment by unconsciously substituting it by an easier judgment[115]
Attribution theory
Salience
Nave realism
1
7 SEE ALSO
7 See also
Aective forecasting
Self-perception theory
Heuristics in judgment and decision making, including:
Availability heuristic estimating what is
more likely by what is more available in memory, which is biased toward vivid, unusual, or
emotionally charged examples[51]
Representativeness heuristic judging probabilities on the basis of resemblance[51]
Aect heuristic basing a decision on an emotional reaction rather than a calculation of risks
and benets[116]
Apophenia
Black swan theory
Chronostasis
Cognitive bias in animals
Cognitive bias mitigation
Cognitive distortion
Confabulation
Cross-race eect
Dysrationalia
Feedback
Frame rate
Introspection illusion
Misinterpretations
innumeracy.
misuse
of
statistics;
List of fallacies
List of memory biases
Media bias
Mind projection fallacy
Pareidolia
Pollyanna principle
Positive feedback
Prevalence eect
Publication bias
Raster scan
Recall bias
Saccade
Debiasing
Saccadic masking
Saccadic suppression of image displacement
Debiasing is the reduction of biases in judgment and decision making through incentives, nudges, and training.
Cognitive bias mitigation and cognitive bias modication
are forms of debiasing specically applicable to cognitive
biases and their eects.
Self-handicapping
Systematic bias
Transsaccadic memory
Notes
[14] Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., BakermansKranenburg, M.J., & van IJzendoorn, M.H. (2007).
Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and non-anxious
individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin.
[15] Goddard, Kate; Roudsari, Abdul; Wyatt, Jeremy C.
(2011). "Automation Bias A Hidden Issue for Clinical
Decision Support System Use. International Perspectives
in Health Informatics. Studies in Health Technology and
Informatics. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-7093-17
[16] Schwarz, N.; Bless, Herbert; Strack, Fritz; Klumpp,
G.; Rittenauer-Schatka, Helga; Simons, Annette (1991).
Ease of Retrieval as Information: Another Look at the
Availability Heuristic (PDF). Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology. 61 (2): 195202. doi:10.1037/00223514.61.2.195. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9
February 2014. Retrieved 19 Oct 2014.
[17] Kuran, Timur; Cass R Sunstein (1998). Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation. Stanford Law Review. 51:
683. doi:10.2307/1229439.
[18] Sanna, Lawrence J.; Schwarz, Norbert; Stocker, Shevaun L. (2002). When debiasing backres: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing
hindsight. (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28 (3): 497502.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.497. ISSN 0278-7393.
[19] Colman, Andrew (2003). Oxford Dictionary of Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 77. ISBN
0-19-280632-7.
[20] Baron 1994, pp. 224228
[21] Klauer, K. C.; Musch, J; Naumer, B (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review.
107 (4): 852884. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.852.
PMID 11089409.
[22] Pronin, Emily; Matthew B. Kugler (July 2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Elsevier. 43 (4): 565578.
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011. ISSN 0022-1031.
[23] Walker, Drew; Vul, Edward (2013-10-25). Hierarchical
Encoding Makes Individuals in a Group Seem More Attractive. Psychological Science. 20 (11): 230235.
doi:10.1177/0956797613497969. PMID 24163333.
[24] Mather, M.; Shar, E.; Johnson, M.K. (2000).
Misrememberance of options past: Source monitoring
and choice (PDF). Psychological Science. 11 (2):
132138.
doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00228.
PMID
11273420.
[25] Oswald, Margit E.; Grosjean, Stefan (2004). Conrmation Bias. In Pohl, Rdiger F. Cognitive Illusions: A
Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement
and Memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. pp. 7996.
ISBN 978-1-84169-351-4. OCLC 55124398.
8 NOTES
[42] Zwicky, Arnold (2005-08-07). Just Between Dr. Language and I. Language Log.
[28] Edwards, W. (1968). Conservatism in human information processing. In Kleinmuntz, B. Formal representation
of human judgment. New York: Wiley. pp. 1752.
[29] Johnson, Hollyn M.; Colleen M. Seifert (November
1994). Sources of the continued inuence eect: When
misinformation in memory aects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition. 20 (6): 14201436. doi:10.1037/02787393.20.6.1420.
[30] Plous 1993, pp. 3841
[31] Ciccarelli, Saundra; White, J. (2014). Psychology (4th
ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. p. 62. ISBN 0205973353.
[32] Ackerman, Mark S., ed. (2003). Sharing expertise beyond
knowledge management (online ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 7. ISBN 9780262011952.
[33] Steven R. Quartz, The State Of The World Isnt Nearly As
Bad As You Think, Edge Foundation, Inc., retrieved 201602-17
[34] Why We Spend Coins Faster Than Bills by Chana JoeWalt. All Things Considered, 12 May 2009.
[48] Kogut, Tehila; Ritov, Ilana (2005). The 'Identied Victim' Eect: An Identied Group, or Just a Single Individual?" (PDF). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Wiley InterScience. 18: 157167. doi:10.1002/bdm.492.
Retrieved August 15, 2013.
[83] Pronin, E.; Kruger, J.; Savitsky, K.; Ross, L. (2001). You
don't know me, but I know you: the illusion of asymmetric
insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 81
(4): 639656. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.639. PMID
11642351.
[84] Hoorens, Vera (1993). Self-enhancement and Superiority Biases in Social Comparison. European Review of
Social Psychology. Psychology Press. 4 (1): 113139.
doi:10.1080/14792779343000040.
[85] Plous 2006, p. 206
[86] Plous 2006, p. 185
[87] Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group Dynamics (5th ed.). Pacic
Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[88] Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The belowaverage eect and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77 (2): 22132. doi:10.1037/00223514.77.2.221. PMID 10474208.
8 NOTES
[89] Schacter, Daniel L. (1999). The Seven Sins of Mem- [103] Ally, B. A.; Gold, C. A.; Budson, A. E. (2009). The picory: Insights From Psychology and Cognitive Neuroture superiority eect in patients with Alzheimers disease
science. American Psychologist. 54 (3): 182203.
and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 47:
doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182. PMID 10199218.
595598. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.010.
[90] Cacioppo, John (2002). Foundations in social neuro- [104] Curran, T.; Doyle, J. (2011). Picture superiority doubly
science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 130132.
dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familISBN 026253195X.
iarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23 (5): 1247
1262. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21464.
[91] Walker, W. Richard; John J. Skowronski; Charles P.
Thompson (1994). Eects of Humor on Sentence Mem- [105] Martin, G. Neil; Neil R. Carlson; William Buskist (2007).
ory (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology: LearnPsychology (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. pp. 309310.
ing, Memory, and Cognition. American Psychological
ISBN 978-0-273-71086-8.
Association, Inc. 20 (4): 953967. doi:10.1037/02787393.20.4.953. Retrieved 2015-04-19.
[106] When comprehension diculty improves memory for
text. O'Brien, Edward J.; Myers, Jerome L. Journal of
[92] Schmidt, Stephen R. (2003). Life Is Pleasantand
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CogMemory Helps to Keep It That Way!" (PDF). Review of
nition, Vol 11(1), Jan 1985, 1221. doi:10.1037/0278General Psychology. Educational Publishing Foundation.
7393.11.1.12
7 (2): 203210. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.203.
[107] Rubin, Wetzler & Nebes, 1986; Rubin, Rahhal & Poon,
[93] Koriat, A.; M. Goldsmith; A. Pansky (2000). To1998
ward a Psychology of Memory Accuracy.
Annual Review of Psychology.
51 (1): 481537. [108] David A. Lieberman (8 December 2011). Human Learndoi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481. PMID 10751979.
ing and Memory. Cambridge University Press. p. 432.
ISBN 978-1-139-50253-5.
[94] Craik & Lockhart, 1972
[109] Morton, Crowder & Prussin, 1971
[95] Kinnell, Angela; Dennis, S. (2011). The list length
eect in recognition memory: an analysis of potential [110] Ian Pitt; Alistair D. N. Edwards (2003). Design of Speechconfounds. Memory & Cognition. Adelaide, Australia:
Based Devices: A Practical Guide. Springer. p. 26. ISBN
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide. 39 (2):
978-1-85233-436-9.
34863. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0007-6.
[111] E. Bruce Goldstein. Cognitive Psychology: Connect[96] Wayne Weiten (2010). Psychology: Themes and Variaing Mind, Research and Everyday Experience. Cengage
tions: Themes and Variations. Cengage Learning. p. 338.
Learning. p. 231. ISBN 978-1-133-00912-2.
ISBN 978-0-495-60197-5.
[112] Not everyone is in such awe of the internet. Evening
[97] Wayne Weiten (2007). Psychology: Themes and VariaStandard. Evening Standard. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
tions: Themes And Variations. Cengage Learning. p. 260.
ISBN 978-0-495-09303-9.
[113] Poppenk, Walia, Joanisse, Danckert, & Khler, 2006
[98] Slamecka NJ (1968). An examination of trace stor[114] Von Restor, H (1933). "ber die Wirkung von Bereage in free recall. J Exp Psychol. 76 (4): 50413.
ichsbildungen im Spurenfeld (The eects of eld formadoi:10.1037/h0025695. PMID 5650563.
tion in the trace eld)".. Psychological Research. 18 (1):
299342. doi:10.1007/bf02409636.
[99] Shepard, R.N. (1967). Recognition memory for words,
sentences, and pictures. Journal of Learning and
[115] Kahneman, Daniel; Shane Frederick (2002). RepresenVerbal Behavior. 6: 156163. doi:10.1016/s0022tativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive
5371(67)80067-7.
Judgment. In Thomas Gilovich; Dale Grin; Daniel
Kahneman. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of
[100] McBride, D. M.; Dosher, B.A. (2002). A compariIntuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University
son of conscious and automatic memory processes for
Press. pp. 4981. ISBN 978-0-521-79679-8. OCLC
picture and word stimuli: a process dissociation anal47364085.
ysis. Consciousness and Cognition. 11: 423460.
doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(02)00007-7.
[116] Slovic, Paul; Melissa Finucane; Ellen Peters; Donald G.
MacGregor (2002). The Aect Heuristic. In Thomas
[101] Defetyer, M. A.; Russo, R.; McPartlin, P. L. (2009).
Gilovich; Dale Grin; Daniel Kahneman. Heuristics and
The picture superiority eect in recognition memBiases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge
ory: a developmental study using the response signal
University Press. pp. 397420. ISBN 0-521-79679-2.
procedure. Cognitive Development. 24: 265273.
doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.05.002.
[117] Scopelliti, Irene; Morewedge, Carey K.; McCormick,
[102] Whitehouse, A. J.; Maybery, M.T.; Durkin, K. (2006).
Erin; Min, H. Lauren; Lebrecht, Sophie; Kassam, Karim
The development of the picture-superiority eect.
S. (2015-04-24). Bias Blind Spot: Structure, MeasureBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology. 24: 767
ment, and Consequences. Management Science. 61:
24682486. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096.
773. doi:10.1348/026151005X74153.
References
Tetlock, Philip E. (2005). Expert Political Judgment: how good is it? how can we know?. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-69112302-8.
Bishop, Michael A.; Trout, J. D. (2004). Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment.
New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19516229-3.
Gilovich, Thomas (1993). How We Know What
Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press. ISBN
0-02-911706-2.
Gilovich, Thomas; Grin, Dale; Kahneman, Daniel
(2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-79679-2.
Greenwald, Anthony G. (1980). The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and Revision of Personal
History (PDF). American Psychologist. American Psychological Association. 35 (7): 603
618. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.7.603. ISSN
0003-066X.
Hardman, David (2009). Judgment and decision making: psychological perspectives. WileyBlackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-2398-3.
Kahneman, Daniel; Slovic, Paul; Tversky, Amos
(1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics
and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 0-521-28414-7.
Kahneman, Daniel; Knetsch, Jack L.; Thaler,
Richard H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment
Eect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias (PDF).
The Journal of Economic Perspectives. American Economic Association. 5 (1): 193206.
doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 24, 2012.
Plous, Scott (1993). The Psychology of Judgment
and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
ISBN 0-07-050477-6.
10
10
10.1
10.2
Images
File:Cognitive_Bias_Codex_-_180+_biases,_designed_by_John_Manoogian_III_(jm3).jpg Source:
https://upload.wikimedia.
org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Cognitive_Bias_Codex_-_180%2B_biases%2C_designed_by_John_Manoogian_III_%28jm3%29.jpg
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Jm3
File:Free-to-read_lock_75.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Free-to-read_lock_75.svg License: CC0
Contributors: Adapted from 9px|Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white_green.svg Original artist: This version:Trappist_the_monk (talk)
(Uploads)
File:Logic_portal.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Logic_portal.svg License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Watchduck (a.k.a. Tilman Piesk)
File:Logo_sociology.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Logo_sociology.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Tomeq183
File:Nicolas_P._Rougier{}s_rendering_of_the_human_brain.png Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/
Nicolas_P._Rougier%27s_rendering_of_the_human_brain.png License: GPL Contributors: http://www.loria.fr/~{}rougier Original artist:
Nicolas Rougier
File:Psi2.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Psi2.svg License: Public domain Contributors: No machinereadable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims). Original artist: No machine-readable author provided.
Gdh~commonswiki assumed (based on copyright claims).
10.3
Content license