0% found this document useful (0 votes)
704 views8 pages

List of Cognitive Biases - Wikipedia PDF

Uploaded by

billludley_15
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
704 views8 pages

List of Cognitive Biases - Wikipedia PDF

Uploaded by

billludley_15
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 8

List of cognitive biases

1 Decision-making, belief, and behavioral biases


Many of these biases aect belief formation, business
and economic decisions, and human behavior in general.
They arise as a replicable result to a specic condition.
When confronted with a specic situation, the deviation
from what is normally expected can be characterized by:

2 Social biases
Most of these biases are labeled as attributional biases.
Cognitive biases, categorized.
Illustration by John Manoogian III (jm3).[1]

3 Memory errors and biases


Main article: List of memory biases

Cognitive biases are tendencies to think in certain ways


that can lead to systematic deviations from a standard In psychology and cognitive science, a memory bias is a
of rationality or good judgment, and are often studied in cognitive bias that either enhances or impairs the recall
of a memory (either the chances that the memory will
psychology and behavioral economics.
be recalled at all, or the amount of time it takes for it
Although the reality of these biases is conrmed by
to be recalled, or both), or that alters the content of a
replicable research, there are often controversies about
reported memory. There are many types of memory bias,
how to classify these biases or how to explain them.[2]
including:
Some are eects of information-processing rules (i.e.,
mental shortcuts), called heuristics, that the brain uses to
produce decisions or judgments. Such eects are called
cognitive biases.[3][4] Biases have a variety of forms and 4 Common theoretical causes of
appear as cognitive (cold) bias, such as mental noise,[5]
some cognitive biases
or motivational (hot) bias, such as when beliefs are distorted by wishful thinking. Both eects can be present at
Bounded rationality limits on optimization and rathe same time.[6][7]
tionality
There are also controversies over some of these biases as
to whether they count as useless or irrational, or whether
they result in useful attitudes or behavior. For example,
when getting to know others, people tend to ask leading
questions which seem biased towards conrming their
assumptions about the person. However, this kind of
conrmation bias has also been argued to be an example of social skill: a way to establish a connection with
the other person.[8]

Prospect theory
Mental accounting
Adaptive bias basing decisions on limited information and biasing them based on the costs
of being wrong.
Attribute substitution making a complex, dicult
judgment by unconsciously substituting it by an easier judgment[115]

Although this research overwhelmingly involves human


subjects, some ndings that demonstrate bias have been
found in non-human animals as well. For example,
hyperbolic discounting has been observed in rats, pigeons, and monkeys.[9]

Attribution theory
Salience
Nave realism
1

7 SEE ALSO

7 See also

Cognitive dissonance, and related:


Impression management

Aective forecasting

Self-perception theory
Heuristics in judgment and decision making, including:
Availability heuristic estimating what is
more likely by what is more available in memory, which is biased toward vivid, unusual, or
emotionally charged examples[51]
Representativeness heuristic judging probabilities on the basis of resemblance[51]
Aect heuristic basing a decision on an emotional reaction rather than a calculation of risks
and benets[116]

Apophenia
Black swan theory
Chronostasis
Cognitive bias in animals
Cognitive bias mitigation
Cognitive distortion
Confabulation
Cross-race eect
Dysrationalia

Some theories of emotion such as:


Two-factor theory of emotion

Feedback

Somatic markers hypothesis

Frame rate

Introspection illusion
Misinterpretations
innumeracy.

List of common misconceptions


or

misuse

of

statistics;

List of fallacies
List of memory biases

A 2012 Psychological Bulletin article suggested that at


least eight seemingly unrelated biases can be produced
by the same information-theoretic generative mechanism
that assumes noisy information processing during storage
and retrieval of information in human memory.[5]

List of topics related to public relations and propaganda


Lists of thinking-related topics
Logical fallacy

Individual dierences in decision


making biases

People do appear to have stable individual dierences in


their susceptibility to decision biases such as overcondence, temporal discounting, and bias blind spot.[117]
That said, these stable levels of bias within individuals are possible to change. Participants in experiments
who watched training videos and played debiasing games
showed medium to large reductions both immediately and
up to three months later in the extent to which they exhibited susceptibility to six cognitive biases: anchoring, bias
blind spot, conrmation bias, fundamental attribution error, projection bias, and representativeness.[118]

Media bias
Mind projection fallacy
Pareidolia
Pollyanna principle
Positive feedback
Prevalence eect
Publication bias
Raster scan
Recall bias
Saccade

Debiasing

Saccadic masking
Saccadic suppression of image displacement

Debiasing is the reduction of biases in judgment and decision making through incentives, nudges, and training.
Cognitive bias mitigation and cognitive bias modication
are forms of debiasing specically applicable to cognitive
biases and their eects.

Self-handicapping
Systematic bias
Transsaccadic memory

Notes

[1] Cognitive Bias Codex Poster. Design Hacks. Retrieved


2016-09-19.
[2] Dougherty, M. R. P.; Gettys, C. F.; Ogden, E. E. (1999).
MINERVA-DM: A memory processes model for judgments of likelihood (PDF). Psychological Review. 106
(1): 180209. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.106.1.180.
[3] Kahneman, D.; Tversky, A. (1972). Subjective probability: A judgment of representativeness. Cognitive Psychology. 3: 430454. doi:10.1016/00100285(72)90016-3.
[4] Baron, J. (2007). Thinking and deciding (4th ed.).
New York City: Cambridge University Press. ISBN
9781139466028.
[5] Martin Hilbert (2012). Toward a synthesis of cognitive
biases: How noisy information processing can bias human
decision making (PDF). Psychological Bulletin. 138 (2):
211237. doi:10.1037/a0025940. Lay summary.
[6] Maccoun, Robert J. (1998).
Biases in the interpretation and use of research results (PDF).
Annual Review of Psychology.
49 (1): 25987.
doi:10.1146/annurev.psych.49.1.259. PMID 15012470.
[7] Nickerson, Raymond S. (1998). Conrmation Bias: A
Ubiquitous Phenomenon in Many Guises (PDF). Review of General Psychology. Educational Publishing
Foundation. 2 (2): 175220 [198]. doi:10.1037/10892680.2.2.175. ISSN 1089-2680.
[8] Dardenne, Benoit; Leyens, Jacques-Philippe (1995).
Conrmation Bias as a Social Skill. Personality
and Social Psychology Bulletin. Society for Personality and Social Psychology. 21 (11): 12291239.
doi:10.1177/01461672952111011. ISSN 1552-7433.
[9] Alexander, William H.; Brown, Joshua W. (1 June
2010). Hyperbolically Discounted Temporal Dierence
Learning. Neural Computation. 22 (6): 15111527.
doi:10.1162/neco.2010.08-09-1080. PMC 3005720 .
PMID 20100071.
[10] Baron 1994, p. 372
[11] Zhang, Yu; Lewis, Mark; Pellon, Michael; Coleman,
Phillip (2007). A Preliminary Research on Modeling
Cognitive Agents for Social Environments in Multi-Agent
Systems (PDF): 116123.
[12] Iverson, Grant; Brooks, Brian; Holdnack, James (2008).
Misdiagnosis of Cognitive Impairment in Forensic Neuropsychology. In Heilbronner, Robert L. Neuropsychology in the Courtroom: Expert Analysis of Reports and
Testimony. New York: Guilford Press. p. 248. ISBN
9781593856342.
[13] The Real Reason We Dress Pets Like People. LiveScience.com. Retrieved 2015-11-16.

[14] Bar-Haim, Y., Lamy, D., Pergamin, L., BakermansKranenburg, M.J., & van IJzendoorn, M.H. (2007).
Threat-related attentional bias in anxious and non-anxious
individuals: A meta-analytic study. Psychological Bulletin.
[15] Goddard, Kate; Roudsari, Abdul; Wyatt, Jeremy C.
(2011). "Automation Bias A Hidden Issue for Clinical
Decision Support System Use. International Perspectives
in Health Informatics. Studies in Health Technology and
Informatics. IOS Press. doi:10.3233/978-1-60750-7093-17
[16] Schwarz, N.; Bless, Herbert; Strack, Fritz; Klumpp,
G.; Rittenauer-Schatka, Helga; Simons, Annette (1991).
Ease of Retrieval as Information: Another Look at the
Availability Heuristic (PDF). Journal of Personality and
Social Psychology. 61 (2): 195202. doi:10.1037/00223514.61.2.195. Archived from the original (PDF) on 9
February 2014. Retrieved 19 Oct 2014.
[17] Kuran, Timur; Cass R Sunstein (1998). Availability Cascades and Risk Regulation. Stanford Law Review. 51:
683. doi:10.2307/1229439.
[18] Sanna, Lawrence J.; Schwarz, Norbert; Stocker, Shevaun L. (2002). When debiasing backres: Accessible content and accessibility experiences in debiasing
hindsight. (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology:
Learning, Memory, and Cognition. 28 (3): 497502.
doi:10.1037/0278-7393.28.3.497. ISSN 0278-7393.
[19] Colman, Andrew (2003). Oxford Dictionary of Psychology. New York: Oxford University Press. p. 77. ISBN
0-19-280632-7.
[20] Baron 1994, pp. 224228
[21] Klauer, K. C.; Musch, J; Naumer, B (2000). On belief bias in syllogistic reasoning. Psychological Review.
107 (4): 852884. doi:10.1037/0033-295X.107.4.852.
PMID 11089409.
[22] Pronin, Emily; Matthew B. Kugler (July 2007). Valuing thoughts, ignoring behavior: The introspection illusion as a source of the bias blind spot. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology. Elsevier. 43 (4): 565578.
doi:10.1016/j.jesp.2006.05.011. ISSN 0022-1031.
[23] Walker, Drew; Vul, Edward (2013-10-25). Hierarchical
Encoding Makes Individuals in a Group Seem More Attractive. Psychological Science. 20 (11): 230235.
doi:10.1177/0956797613497969. PMID 24163333.
[24] Mather, M.; Shar, E.; Johnson, M.K. (2000).
Misrememberance of options past: Source monitoring
and choice (PDF). Psychological Science. 11 (2):
132138.
doi:10.1111/1467-9280.00228.
PMID
11273420.
[25] Oswald, Margit E.; Grosjean, Stefan (2004). Conrmation Bias. In Pohl, Rdiger F. Cognitive Illusions: A
Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement
and Memory. Hove, UK: Psychology Press. pp. 7996.
ISBN 978-1-84169-351-4. OCLC 55124398.

8 NOTES

[26] Fisk, John E. (2004). Conjunction fallacy. In Pohl,


Rdiger F. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies
and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Hove,
UK: Psychology Press. pp. 2342. ISBN 978-1-84169351-4. OCLC 55124398.

[41] Kahneman, Daniel; Alan B. Krueger; David Schkade;


Norbert Schwarz; Arthur A. Stone (2006-06-30). Would
you be happier if you were richer?
A focusing
illusion (PDF). Science.
312 (5782): 190810.
doi:10.1126/science.1129688. PMID 16809528.

[27] DuCharme, W. M. (1970). Response bias explanation of


conservative human inference. Journal of Experimental
Psychology. 85 (1): 6674. doi:10.1037/h0029546.

[42] Zwicky, Arnold (2005-08-07). Just Between Dr. Language and I. Language Log.

[28] Edwards, W. (1968). Conservatism in human information processing. In Kleinmuntz, B. Formal representation
of human judgment. New York: Wiley. pp. 1752.
[29] Johnson, Hollyn M.; Colleen M. Seifert (November
1994). Sources of the continued inuence eect: When
misinformation in memory aects later inferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and
Cognition. 20 (6): 14201436. doi:10.1037/02787393.20.6.1420.
[30] Plous 1993, pp. 3841
[31] Ciccarelli, Saundra; White, J. (2014). Psychology (4th
ed.). Pearson Education, Inc. p. 62. ISBN 0205973353.
[32] Ackerman, Mark S., ed. (2003). Sharing expertise beyond
knowledge management (online ed.). Cambridge, Massachusetts: MIT Press. p. 7. ISBN 9780262011952.
[33] Steven R. Quartz, The State Of The World Isnt Nearly As
Bad As You Think, Edge Foundation, Inc., retrieved 201602-17

[43] Lichtenstein, S., & Fischho, B. (1977). Do those who


know more also know more about how much they know?
Organizational Behavior and Human Performance, 20(2),
159183. doi:10.1016/0030-5073(77)90001-0
[44] Merkle, E. C. (2009). The disutility of the hard-easy effect in choice condence. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review. 16 (1): 204213. doi:10.3758/PBR.16.1.204.
[45] Juslin, P; Winman, A.; Olsson, H. (2000). Naive empiricism and dogmatism in condence research: a critical examination of the hard-easy eect. Psychological Review.
107 (2): 384396. doi:10.1037/0033-295x.107.2.384.
[46] Pohl, Rdiger F. (2004). Hindsight Bias. In Pohl, Rdiger F. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and
Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Hove, UK:
Psychology Press. pp. 363378. ISBN 978-1-84169351-4. OCLC 55124398.
[47] Laibson, David (1997). Golden Eggs and Hyperbolic
Discounting. Quarterly Journal of Economics. 112 (2):
443477. doi:10.1162/003355397555253.

[34] Why We Spend Coins Faster Than Bills by Chana JoeWalt. All Things Considered, 12 May 2009.

[48] Kogut, Tehila; Ritov, Ilana (2005). The 'Identied Victim' Eect: An Identied Group, or Just a Single Individual?" (PDF). Journal of Behavioral Decision Making. Wiley InterScience. 18: 157167. doi:10.1002/bdm.492.
Retrieved August 15, 2013.

[35] Hsee, Christopher K.; Zhang, Jiao (2004). Distinction


bias: Misprediction and mischoice due to joint evaluation. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 86
(5): 680695. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.86.5.680. PMID
15161394.

[49] Thompson, Suzanne C. (1999). Illusions of Control:


How We Overestimate Our Personal Inuence. Current
Directions in Psychological Science. Association for Psychological Science. 8 (6): 187190. doi:10.1111/14678721.00044. ISSN 0963-7214. JSTOR 20182602.

[36] Kruger, Justin; Dunning, David (1999). Unskilled and


Unaware of It: How Diculties in Recognizing Ones
Own Incompetence Lead to Inated Self-Assessments.
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77 (6):
112134. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1121. PMID
10626367. CiteSeerX: 10.1.1.64.2655.

[50] Dierkes, Meinolf; Antal, Ariane Berthoin; Child, John;


Ikujiro Nonaka (2003). Handbook of Organizational
Learning and Knowledge. Oxford University Press. p. 22.
ISBN 978-0-19-829582-2. Retrieved 9 September 2013.

[37] (Kahneman, Knetsch & Thaler 1991, p. 193) Richard


Thaler coined the term endowment eect.
[38] Maria Trochatos reviews The Essential Child: Origins of
Essentialism in Everyday Thought by Susan A. Gelman
[39] Wagenaar, W. A.; Keren, G. B. (1985). Calibration of
probability assessments by professional blackjack dealers,
statistical experts, and lay people. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 36 (3): 406416.
doi:10.1016/0749-5978(85)90008-1.
[40] Jeng, M. (2006). A selected history of expectation bias in
physics. American Journal of Physics. 74 (7): 578583.
doi:10.1119/1.2186333.

[51] Tversky, Amos; Daniel Kahneman (September 27,


1974). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics and
Biases. Science. American Association for the Advancement of Science.
185 (4157): 11241131.
doi:10.1126/science.185.4157.1124. PMID 17835457.
[52] Fiedler, K. (1991). The tricky nature of skewed
frequency tables: An information loss account of
distinctiveness-based illusory correlations. Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology. 60 (1): 2436.
doi:10.1037/0022-3514.60.1.24.
[53] Sanna, Lawrence J.; Schwarz, Norbert (2004). Integrating Temporal Biases: The Interplay of Focal
Thoughts and Accessibility Experiences. Psychological
Science. American Psychological Society. 15 (7): 474
481. doi:10.1111/j.0956-7976.2004.00704.x. PMID
15200632.

[54] Baron 1994, pp. 258259


[55] (Kahneman, Knetsch & Thaler 1991, p. 193) Daniel
Kahneman, together with Amos Tversky, coined the term
loss aversion.

[71] Dalton, D. & Ortegren, M. (2011). Gender dierences


in ethics research: The importance of controlling for the
social desirability response bias. Journal of Business
Ethics. 103 (1): 7393. doi:10.1007/s10551-011-08438.

[56] Bornstein, Robert F.; Crave-Lemley, Catherine (2004).


Mere exposure eect. In Pohl, Rdiger F. Cognitive Illusions: A Handbook on Fallacies and Biases in Thinking, Judgement and Memory. Hove, UK: Psychology
Press. pp. 215234. ISBN 978-1-84169-351-4. OCLC
55124398.

[72] Kahneman, Knetsch & Thaler 1991, p. 193

[57] Shar, Eldar; Diamond, Peter; Tversky, Amos (2000).


Money Illusion. In Kahneman, Daniel; Tversky, Amos.
Choices, values, and frames. Cambridge University Press.
pp. 335355. ISBN 978-0-521-62749-8.

[75] Forsyth, Donelson R (2009). Group Dynamics (5th ed.).


Cengage Learning. p. 317. ISBN 978-0-495-59952-4.

[58] Haizlip, Julie; et al. Perspective: The Negativity


Bias, Medical Education, and the Culture of Academic
Medicine: Why Culture Change Is Hard. Retrieved October 3, 2012.
[59] Baron 1994, p. 353
[60] Baron 1994, p. 386
[61] Baron 1994, p. 44
[62] Hardman 2009, p. 104
[63] Adams, P. A.; Adams, J. K. (1960). Condence in the
recognition and reproduction of words dicult to spell.
The American Journal of Psychology. 73 (4): 544552.
doi:10.2307/1419942. PMID 13681411.

[73] Baron 1994, p. 382


[74] Baron, J. (in preparation). Thinking and Deciding, 4th
edition. New York: Cambridge University Press.

[76] Penn Psychologists Believe 'Unit Bias Determines The


Acceptable Amount To Eat. ScienceDaily (Nov. 21,
2005)
[77] Meegan, Daniel V. (2010). Zero-Sum Bias: Perceived
Competition Despite Unlimited Resources. Frontiers in
Psychology. 1. doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2010.00191. ISSN
1664-1078.
[78] Chernev, Alexander (2007). Jack of All Trades or Master of One? Product Dierentiation and Compensatory
Reasoning in Consumer Choice. Journal of Consumer
Research. 33 (4): 430444. doi:10.1086/510217. ISSN
0093-5301.
[79] Milgram, Stanley (Oct 1963). Behavioral Study of obedience.. The Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology.
67 (4).

[64] Horage, Ulrich (2004). Overcondence. In Rdiger


Pohl. Cognitive Illusions: a handbook on fallacies and
biases in thinking, judgement and memory. Psychology
Press. ISBN 978-1-84169-351-4.

[80] Marks, Gary; Miller, Norman (1987). Ten years


of research on the false-consensus eect: An empirical and theoretical review. Psychological Bulletin.
American Psychological Association. 102 (1): 7290.
doi:10.1037/0033-2909.102.1.72.

[65] Sutherland 2007, pp. 172178

[81] Sutherland 2007, pp. 138139

[66] Hsee, Christopher K.; Hastie, Reid (2006). Decision


and experience: why don't we choose what makes us
happy?" (PDF). Trends in Cognitive Sciences. 10 (1): 31
37. doi:10.1016/j.tics.2005.11.007. PMID 16318925.

[82] Baron 1994, p. 275

[67] Hardman 2009, p. 137


[68] Attneave, F. (1953). Psychological probability as a function of experienced frequency. Journal of Experimental Psychology. 46 (2): 8186. doi:10.1037/h0057955.
PMID 13084849.
[69] Fischho, B.; Slovic, P.; Lichtenstein, S. (1977). Knowing with certainty: The appropriateness of extreme condence. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance. 3 (4): 552564.
doi:10.1037/0096-1523.3.4.552.
[70] Garcia, Stephen M.; Song, Hyunjin; Tesser, Abraham (November 2010). Tainted recommendations:
The social comparison bias. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 113 (2): 97
101. doi:10.1016/j.obhdp.2010.06.002. ISSN 07495978. Lay summary BPS Research Digest (2010-10-30).

[83] Pronin, E.; Kruger, J.; Savitsky, K.; Ross, L. (2001). You
don't know me, but I know you: the illusion of asymmetric
insight. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 81
(4): 639656. doi:10.1037/0022-3514.81.4.639. PMID
11642351.
[84] Hoorens, Vera (1993). Self-enhancement and Superiority Biases in Social Comparison. European Review of
Social Psychology. Psychology Press. 4 (1): 113139.
doi:10.1080/14792779343000040.
[85] Plous 2006, p. 206
[86] Plous 2006, p. 185
[87] Forsyth, D. R. (2009). Group Dynamics (5th ed.). Pacic
Grove, CA: Brooks/Cole.
[88] Kruger, J. (1999). Lake Wobegon be gone! The belowaverage eect and the egocentric nature of comparative ability judgments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 77 (2): 22132. doi:10.1037/00223514.77.2.221. PMID 10474208.

8 NOTES

[89] Schacter, Daniel L. (1999). The Seven Sins of Mem- [103] Ally, B. A.; Gold, C. A.; Budson, A. E. (2009). The picory: Insights From Psychology and Cognitive Neuroture superiority eect in patients with Alzheimers disease
science. American Psychologist. 54 (3): 182203.
and mild cognitive impairment. Neuropsychologia. 47:
doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182. PMID 10199218.
595598. doi:10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2008.10.010.
[90] Cacioppo, John (2002). Foundations in social neuro- [104] Curran, T.; Doyle, J. (2011). Picture superiority doubly
science. Cambridge, Mass: MIT Press. pp. 130132.
dissociates the ERP correlates of recollection and familISBN 026253195X.
iarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience. 23 (5): 1247
1262. doi:10.1162/jocn.2010.21464.
[91] Walker, W. Richard; John J. Skowronski; Charles P.
Thompson (1994). Eects of Humor on Sentence Mem- [105] Martin, G. Neil; Neil R. Carlson; William Buskist (2007).
ory (PDF). Journal of Experimental Psychology: LearnPsychology (3rd ed.). Pearson Education. pp. 309310.
ing, Memory, and Cognition. American Psychological
ISBN 978-0-273-71086-8.
Association, Inc. 20 (4): 953967. doi:10.1037/02787393.20.4.953. Retrieved 2015-04-19.
[106] When comprehension diculty improves memory for
text. O'Brien, Edward J.; Myers, Jerome L. Journal of
[92] Schmidt, Stephen R. (2003). Life Is Pleasantand
Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and CogMemory Helps to Keep It That Way!" (PDF). Review of
nition, Vol 11(1), Jan 1985, 1221. doi:10.1037/0278General Psychology. Educational Publishing Foundation.
7393.11.1.12
7 (2): 203210. doi:10.1037/1089-2680.7.2.203.
[107] Rubin, Wetzler & Nebes, 1986; Rubin, Rahhal & Poon,
[93] Koriat, A.; M. Goldsmith; A. Pansky (2000). To1998
ward a Psychology of Memory Accuracy.
Annual Review of Psychology.
51 (1): 481537. [108] David A. Lieberman (8 December 2011). Human Learndoi:10.1146/annurev.psych.51.1.481. PMID 10751979.
ing and Memory. Cambridge University Press. p. 432.
ISBN 978-1-139-50253-5.
[94] Craik & Lockhart, 1972
[109] Morton, Crowder & Prussin, 1971
[95] Kinnell, Angela; Dennis, S. (2011). The list length
eect in recognition memory: an analysis of potential [110] Ian Pitt; Alistair D. N. Edwards (2003). Design of Speechconfounds. Memory & Cognition. Adelaide, Australia:
Based Devices: A Practical Guide. Springer. p. 26. ISBN
School of Psychology, University of Adelaide. 39 (2):
978-1-85233-436-9.
34863. doi:10.3758/s13421-010-0007-6.
[111] E. Bruce Goldstein. Cognitive Psychology: Connect[96] Wayne Weiten (2010). Psychology: Themes and Variaing Mind, Research and Everyday Experience. Cengage
tions: Themes and Variations. Cengage Learning. p. 338.
Learning. p. 231. ISBN 978-1-133-00912-2.
ISBN 978-0-495-60197-5.
[112] Not everyone is in such awe of the internet. Evening
[97] Wayne Weiten (2007). Psychology: Themes and VariaStandard. Evening Standard. Retrieved 28 October 2015.
tions: Themes And Variations. Cengage Learning. p. 260.
ISBN 978-0-495-09303-9.
[113] Poppenk, Walia, Joanisse, Danckert, & Khler, 2006
[98] Slamecka NJ (1968). An examination of trace stor[114] Von Restor, H (1933). "ber die Wirkung von Bereage in free recall. J Exp Psychol. 76 (4): 50413.
ichsbildungen im Spurenfeld (The eects of eld formadoi:10.1037/h0025695. PMID 5650563.
tion in the trace eld)".. Psychological Research. 18 (1):
299342. doi:10.1007/bf02409636.
[99] Shepard, R.N. (1967). Recognition memory for words,
sentences, and pictures. Journal of Learning and
[115] Kahneman, Daniel; Shane Frederick (2002). RepresenVerbal Behavior. 6: 156163. doi:10.1016/s0022tativeness Revisited: Attribute Substitution in Intuitive
5371(67)80067-7.
Judgment. In Thomas Gilovich; Dale Grin; Daniel
Kahneman. Heuristics and Biases: The Psychology of
[100] McBride, D. M.; Dosher, B.A. (2002). A compariIntuitive Judgment. Cambridge: Cambridge University
son of conscious and automatic memory processes for
Press. pp. 4981. ISBN 978-0-521-79679-8. OCLC
picture and word stimuli: a process dissociation anal47364085.
ysis. Consciousness and Cognition. 11: 423460.
doi:10.1016/s1053-8100(02)00007-7.
[116] Slovic, Paul; Melissa Finucane; Ellen Peters; Donald G.
MacGregor (2002). The Aect Heuristic. In Thomas
[101] Defetyer, M. A.; Russo, R.; McPartlin, P. L. (2009).
Gilovich; Dale Grin; Daniel Kahneman. Heuristics and
The picture superiority eect in recognition memBiases: The Psychology of Intuitive Judgment. Cambridge
ory: a developmental study using the response signal
University Press. pp. 397420. ISBN 0-521-79679-2.
procedure. Cognitive Development. 24: 265273.
doi:10.1016/j.cogdev.2009.05.002.
[117] Scopelliti, Irene; Morewedge, Carey K.; McCormick,
[102] Whitehouse, A. J.; Maybery, M.T.; Durkin, K. (2006).
Erin; Min, H. Lauren; Lebrecht, Sophie; Kassam, Karim
The development of the picture-superiority eect.
S. (2015-04-24). Bias Blind Spot: Structure, MeasureBritish Journal of Developmental Psychology. 24: 767
ment, and Consequences. Management Science. 61:
24682486. doi:10.1287/mnsc.2014.2096.
773. doi:10.1348/026151005X74153.

[118] Morewedge, Carey K.; Yoon, Haewon; Scopelliti, Irene;


Symborski, Carl W.; Korris, James H.; Kassam, Karim
S. (2015-10-01). Debiasing Decisions Improved Decision Making With a Single Training Intervention. Policy
Insights from the Behavioral and Brain Sciences. 2 (1):
129140. doi:10.1177/2372732215600886. ISSN 23727322.

References

Schacter, Daniel L. (1999). The Seven Sins


of Memory: Insights From Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience (PDF). American Psychologist. American Psychological Association. 54 (3):
182203. doi:10.1037/0003-066X.54.3.182. ISSN
0003-066X. PMID 10199218. Archived from the
original (PDF) on May 13, 2013.
Sutherland, Stuart (2007). Irrationality. Pinter &
Martin. ISBN 978-1-905177-07-3.

Baron, Jonathan (1994). Thinking and deciding


(2nd ed.). Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0521-43732-6.

Tetlock, Philip E. (2005). Expert Political Judgment: how good is it? how can we know?. Princeton: Princeton University Press. ISBN 978-0-69112302-8.

Baron, Jonathan (2000). Thinking and deciding (3rd


ed.). New York: Cambridge University Press. ISBN
0-521-65030-5.

Virine, L.; Trumper, M. (2007). Project Decisions:


The Art and Science. Vienna, VA: Management
Concepts. ISBN 978-1-56726-217-9.

Bishop, Michael A.; Trout, J. D. (2004). Epistemology and the Psychology of Human Judgment.
New York: Oxford University Press. ISBN 0-19516229-3.
Gilovich, Thomas (1993). How We Know What
Isn't So: The Fallibility of Human Reason in Everyday Life. New York: The Free Press. ISBN
0-02-911706-2.
Gilovich, Thomas; Grin, Dale; Kahneman, Daniel
(2002). Heuristics and biases: The psychology of intuitive judgment. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press. ISBN 0-521-79679-2.
Greenwald, Anthony G. (1980). The Totalitarian Ego: Fabrication and Revision of Personal
History (PDF). American Psychologist. American Psychological Association. 35 (7): 603
618. doi:10.1037/0003-066x.35.7.603. ISSN
0003-066X.
Hardman, David (2009). Judgment and decision making: psychological perspectives. WileyBlackwell. ISBN 978-1-4051-2398-3.
Kahneman, Daniel; Slovic, Paul; Tversky, Amos
(1982). Judgment under Uncertainty: Heuristics
and Biases. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University
Press. ISBN 0-521-28414-7.
Kahneman, Daniel; Knetsch, Jack L.; Thaler,
Richard H. (1991). Anomalies: The Endowment
Eect, Loss Aversion, and Status Quo Bias (PDF).
The Journal of Economic Perspectives. American Economic Association. 5 (1): 193206.
doi:10.1257/jep.5.1.193. Archived from the original (PDF) on November 24, 2012.
Plous, Scott (1993). The Psychology of Judgment
and Decision Making. New York: McGraw-Hill.
ISBN 0-07-050477-6.

10

10
10.1

TEXT AND IMAGE SOURCES, CONTRIBUTORS, AND LICENSES

Text and image sources, contributors, and licenses


Text

List of cognitive biases Source: https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_cognitive_biases?oldid=744331614 Contributors: General Wesc,


The Anome, Jose Icaza, Mrwojo, Michael Hardy, Mahjongg, SebastianHelm, Darrell Greenwood, Rl, Timwi, John Cross, Jeq, Texture, Robinh, Wjbeaty, DocWatson42, Andries, Philwelch, Wolfkeeper, Tom harrison, Leonard G., Fjarlq, Jason Quinn, Gracefool, Taak,
Proberts2003, Beland, Pgreennch, Tdent, Robin klein, Rich Farmbrough, Metamatic, Wk muriithi, Number 0, Edgarde, Bender235,
Cretog8, Johnkarp, Viriditas, Konetidy, L33tminion, Knucmo2, Wkerst, DenisHowe, GrantNeufeld, CuriousOne, Avenue, Samohyl Jan,
Trylks, BRW, Iannigb, Hahih, Biddingers, Anonymous4367, Mindmatrix, Sburke, StradivariusTV, Tabletop, Chasfh, Waldir, Marudubshinki, Sparkit, Cuchullain, Jalada, BD2412, Tlroche, Rjwilmsi, .digamma, Koavf, Zbxgscqf, Jweiss11, Moorlock, Mohawkjohn, Exeunt,
Wragge, ZoneSeek, J.Ammon, DVdm, Bgwhite, Wavelength, Wikky Horse, RussBot, Arjuna909, Jamiew, Anomalocaris, Dtrebbien,
ErkDemon, Schlay, Nick, Albedo, Inhighspeed, Frogular, R42, Tkinkhorst, Sills bend, Ejl, Rallette, Iaoth, Wknight94, Dangph, Juniper blue, Cycleskinla, Sandstein, Paul Magnussen, Sverre, Bbartho, Cat Cubed, Badgettrg, Altsarc, Jonathan.s.kt, Zvika, SmackBot,
Aznfanatic6, McGeddon, DCDuring, Lawrencekhoo, Jtneill, CapitalSasha, ZerodEgo, Rachel Pearce, Stevegallery, Wittylama, Frdrick
Lacasse, Christophernandez, Chris the speller, CrookedAsterisk, Jprg1966, MartinPoulter, Droll, Nbarth, Patriarch, Dragice, Scwlong,
Jon.baron, Rrburke, Benjamin Mako Hill, Anthon.E, Jenifan, Nclean, alyosha, DrL, BullRangifer, Nekteo, Mukadderat, HDarke,
RafaelRGarcia, Poliquin, Liquidice5, Grumpyyoungman01, RichardF, Kvng, Hu12, DwightKingsbury, JoeBot, Aeternus, CapitalR, Superjoe30, Dave Runger, Harold f, JForget, Cogpsych, NinjaKid, Punanimal, Harej bot, Amarakana, Lentower, Penbat, Colorfulharp233,
Gregbard, LCP, Vectro, Lamjeremy, Pedrobh, Shnookle72, Danman3459, Olsen34, ValerieBK, Sergei Peysakhov, Ee.wang, Clayoquot,
Travelbird, YechezkelZilber, HonoreDB, Teratornis, , Int3gr4te, Letranova, Thijs!bot, Loudsox, Jm3, Headbomb, Peace01234, Big
Bird, Good Vibrations, WikiSlasher, Guy Macon, Osubuckeyeguy, Waerloeg, Interrelativity, Nhunt, Ingolfson, Hankconn, Leejc, MdMcAli, Arno Matthias, SHCarter, Michele123, WhatamIdoing, IvR, Valerius Tygart, Heqwm, Olsonist, Gwern, Mattjs, WynnQuon, Pilgaard, AstroHurricane001, Richmcl, Maurice Carbonaro, ErnestC, Kpmiyapuram, McSly, Joniale, ElentariAchaea, Messenger82, Robhd,
LeoRomero, VolkovBot, Jmrowland, Joebieber, NFOlson, Lexein, Mark v1.0, SteveJanssen77, JeKo427, Magmi, Edit650, Wunderbarrrrr, Everything counts, Wykypydya, Jesin, Andrewaskew, Kilmer-san, Lamro, Lova Falk, Rurik3, Rob.bastholm, Utrechton, Pm master,
Miniapolis, Sunrise, Cyfal, Tegrenath, WheezePuppet, Wantnot, Drsa12, Digi843, Badger Drink, Unbuttered Parsnip, Douglasjarquin,
Wykily, Bert56~enwiki, Startxxx, Mbrooks21, Kwhitten, Hans Adler, Tn2si58c, Johnuniq, XLinkBot, Nathan Johnson, Richard-of-Earth,
Addbot, Power.corrupts, DOI bot, Barnacles phd, Download, Rj.amdphreak, Amarantus, Cervello84, Endogenous -i, Matzeachmann, CrisBCT, Clay Juicer, Yobot, Dreadfullyboring, Swift2plunder, Kookyunii, AnomieBOT, RobertEves92, Citation bot, Foocha, Toetoetoetoe,
Gap9551, Srich32977, Coretheapple, Crzer07, Alumnum, Wikiteck, Gerntrash, 4RugbyRd, Aaron Kauppi, Captain-n00dle, FrescoBot, Allion, LucienBOT, Diablotin, Hobsonlane, Lightbound, Citation bot 1, DrilBot, Diomedea Exulans, Jonesey95, Weekeepeer, Gamewizard71,
JoeyTwiddle, Lotje, L2blackbelt, Jeisensei, Peacedance, Onel5969, RjwilmsiBot, Uselessmoose, Alfaisanomega, Counseladvise, The Kytan
Apprentice, GoingBatty, Nquinn91, Seren-dipper, Tisane, Dcirovic, Antedater, Lovearobot, , Deanba, Wingman4l7, Donner60,
Drjeanne, Ego White Tray, Jcreigno~enwiki, U3964057, DASHBotAV, ClueBot NG, MitchMcM, This lousy T-shirt, AerobicFox, BarrelProof, MoonLichen, Frietjes, Polskivinnik, The Zealous Skeptic, Spannerjam, DrChrissy, Helpful Pixie Bot, Fwkb, Sondreskarsten, Hapli,
SocialPsych101, BG19bot, Dr Ashton, Northamerica1000, MusikAnimal, 4thaugust1932, InfoCmplx, Roleren, MJAspen, Dr. D Lewis,
BattyBot, Prof. Squirrel, Khorramirad, Litholight, PFConroy, ChrisGualtieri, Calu2000, Sat143su, Vincentdebruijn, Bella224 44, Irahwan,
Dylanvt, Eyal.peer, Timelezz, Willi252, Cerabot~enwiki, Wix86, Paul1andrews, 93, , ZX95, Me, Myself, and I are Here, Faizan, EWangerin, TheFrog001, Alpha-60, Havensre, Toksoz, Xzesey, Sprezzissimo, Scottallison, Clemens87, Ironisms, Glaisher, Toby lang, Dream
Eater, Jwratner1, Finnusertop, Frogger48, Paul2520, Zhnirlwaupp, Squatch347, Sthelen.aqua, ActionZee, Monkbot, Davidstuarthill, Dguptadelhi, Philodemos, Ihaveacatonmydesk, KevinHotaling, Jnav7, Geodon93, Gamma, Smburns47, Carey.Morewedge, JoshBM16, Baking
Soda, Aleksyew, Ikonimbus and Anonymous: 277

10.2

Images

File:Cognitive_Bias_Codex_-_180+_biases,_designed_by_John_Manoogian_III_(jm3).jpg Source:
https://upload.wikimedia.
org/wikipedia/commons/1/18/Cognitive_Bias_Codex_-_180%2B_biases%2C_designed_by_John_Manoogian_III_%28jm3%29.jpg
License: CC BY-SA 4.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Jm3
File:Free-to-read_lock_75.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/80/Free-to-read_lock_75.svg License: CC0
Contributors: Adapted from 9px|Open_Access_logo_PLoS_white_green.svg Original artist: This version:Trappist_the_monk (talk)
(Uploads)
File:Logic_portal.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/7c/Logic_portal.svg License: CC BY-SA 3.0 Contributors: Own work Original artist: Watchduck (a.k.a. Tilman Piesk)
File:Logo_sociology.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/a/a6/Logo_sociology.svg License: Public domain
Contributors: Own work Original artist: Tomeq183
File:Nicolas_P._Rougier{}s_rendering_of_the_human_brain.png Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/7/73/
Nicolas_P._Rougier%27s_rendering_of_the_human_brain.png License: GPL Contributors: http://www.loria.fr/~{}rougier Original artist:
Nicolas Rougier
File:Psi2.svg Source: https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/6/6c/Psi2.svg License: Public domain Contributors: No machinereadable source provided. Own work assumed (based on copyright claims). Original artist: No machine-readable author provided.
Gdh~commonswiki assumed (based on copyright claims).

10.3

Content license

Creative Commons Attribution-Share Alike 3.0

You might also like