ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 2 of 56

DESIGN CRITERIA STRUCTURAL

3.4.1
INTRODUCTION
3.4.1.1

SCOPE/GENERAL
Structural design criteria described herein establishes the minimum requirements for the
structural design of well head platform DDW1 (Jacket & Topsides). The basic
information furnished in Project specification in Appendix-II and III is to be complied
with. The design criteria those relate to functional requirements of components,
principles of design and those directly applicable to bidders design/concept shall be
followed as a mandatory requirement. Project specific requirements and exclusions, if
any shall be as per Appendix-III. The design methods described here in shall be used
in addition to contractors design methods. The functional specifications of the related
activities/items shall be as per Appendix-IA. For substructure design, the provisions of
this design criteria shall apply to both Company and Contractor based on split scope of
work described elsewhere in the bid document.

3.4.1.2

APPLICABLE DOCUMENTS
The latest issue of the standards and codes listed in Appendix-I shall be followed. Apart
from the specific codes mentioned in Appendix-I and various other clauses of this
document, all other relevant and related Codes concerning the specific job under
consideration and/or referred in the above-mentioned Codes shall be followed wherever
applicable. Any conflict between the applicable codes shall be referred to the Company
for resolution. Company's decision in this regard shall be final and binding. In case of
any variation/contradiction between the provisions of this document and applicable
codes, the provisions of this document shall be followed.

3.4.1.3

DEFINITIONS
The following definitions shall apply:
Company shall mean GSPC or the designated representative.
Contractor shall mean the party contracted to perform the work in accordance with the
drawings, specifications & work scope.
Fixed offshore platforms (platform in short) include pile-founded steel structures for
offshore drilling, processing, accommodation, gas flaring, etc.
The term substructure in this Specification applies to the supporting structure from the
wave zone to the foundation and typically includes the jacket and piles.
The term superstructure applies to the structural parts of the topside facilities including
decks, various modules like turbine generator (T.G.), buildings, living quarters,
compressor package, dehydration units, turbine driven pump etc., module support
frames and skids.
Platform in-service design conditions are those, which pertain to the post-installation
phase of the platform's life, and typically include in-place, earthquake and fatigue
considerations.
Pre-service design conditions are those that occur prior to platform operation and
shall generally include load-out, transportation and installation considerations.
Global load conditions are those considered in the analysis and design of the
substructure, superstructure's main trusses and legs and module frames.
Local load conditions are those considered in the analysis and design of plating,
grating, beams, appurtenances and other individual members as applicable.
Nominal weight of structure excludes mill tolerances, inaccuracies, contingencies and
tolerances due to weight growth.
Datum weight of a structure equals the nominal weight increased to allow for mill
tolerances, inaccuracies, contingencies and tolerances for weight growth.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 3 of 56

3.4.1.4
3.4.1.4.1

CHARACTERISTICS
Performance
a) The platform shall be designed to meet its intended purpose and shall satisfy as a
minimum requirement, the specified in-service and pre-service condition as
described herein.
b) The design service life of the platform shall be as per Table-2 of Appendix-II.

3.4.1.4.2

Maintainability
a) Appurtenances such as boat landings, riser protectors, and barge bumpers in the
wave zone shall be designed to be removable and readily replaceable as
specified in bid package. Refer Cl 3.4.3.5.11 for design considerations.
b) Adequate structural appurtenances and clearances shall be provided in the
superstructure for equipment removal and maintenance. Such appurtenances
include cranes, monorails, davit and padeyes.

3.4.2

GENERAL DESIGN REQUIREMENTS

3.4.2.1

GENERAL
The platform shall be sized and designed in accordance with the approved equipment
layout and arrangement. For the determination of platform size and equipment
arrangement, the equipment weights, sizes, clearances, and space requirements for
personnel movement and maintenance purposes shall be considered, and necessary
provision kept in the layout. All the comments of the Company shall be incorporated in
the layout and approval obtained from the Company prior to proceeding with the
analysis and design of the platform. Any future revisions in the layout, if required, shall
be done with the prior approval of the Company.

3.4.2.2

SYSTEM OF UNITS
The SI system of units shall be used throughout for all documentation, drawings, and
calculations. All dimensions shall be shown in millimeters and elevation levels in
meters.

3.4.2.3

MATERIAL
All materials shall conform to respective specification given in Appendix-IA.

3.4.2.4

CHART DATUM LEVEL

All elevations shall be referenced to chart datum ( 0.0 m). Chart Datum shall be
considered as specified in Table-3 of Appendix-II.

3.4.2.5

PLATFORM LOCATION AND ORIENTATION

The location and orientation of the platforms shall be as mentioned in Table-3 of
Appendix-II.

3.4.2.6

WATER DEPTH
The approximate water depth with respect to chart datum at platform location is as
given in Table-3 of Appendix-II. However, pre-engineering survey shall be carried out
by Contractor to establish accurate water depth at the platform location and seabed
features as per specification listed in Appendix-IA. If the slope in seabed is such as to
tilt the jacket by an angle exceeding 1 in 100, the detail design shall take into account
the slope in seabed in the form of adjustment in framing and/or mud-mat elevations.
Water depth to be used in the design of structure shall be based on the preengineering survey.
In the design of appurtenances, a provision shall be kept for variation in the actual
water depth up-to maximum of + 1.0 m.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 4 of 56

3.4.2.7

MARINE GROWTH
The platforms shall be designed with marine growth on all the members of jackets and
appurtenances including risers, caissons etc. as per criteria given in Table-4 of
Appendix-II.

3.4.2.8

LOAD CONTINGENCIES, MILL TOLERANCE AND WELD METAL

The pre-service and in service design loads shall be calculated accurately as described
in relevant sections consisting of dead loads, piping and equipment loads (empty and
operating), building modules, utilities and any other loads to which the system will be
subjected during fabrication, transportation, installation and operation etc.
A minimum of 3% weight allowance to account for mill tolerance and weld metal shall
be applied for all analyses. This allowance shall be added to the estimated
substructure and superstructure dead weight.
Platform in-service and pre-service design loads, applied either globally or locally, shall
include contingencies as defined in Table-1 of Appendix-II, over and above the
estimated loads.

3.4.2.9

GEOMETRICAL CONSTRAINTS
The jacket structures shall be designed with a leg batter of one horizontal to eight
vertical. The top horizontal framing of the jacket shall be at a minimum elevation above
chart datum level, so as not to be in wave splash zone as defined in Table 4 of
Appendix II. The jacket legs through which piles are driven and skirt pile sleeves shall
maintain a constant inside diameter and the annulus shall be fully grouted unless
specified in project specific requirements Appendix III.
There shall be a minimum air gap as per Table-22 of Appendix-II between the crest
elevation of the maximum extreme storm wave and the bottom of steel of the lowest
non-cylindrical structural deck members. For this purpose still water level shall be
considered as per Table-22 of Appendix-II.
Minimum clear distance of any existing sub marine pipeline at mud line shall be 10m
from any nearest member of newly installed jacket.

3.4.2.10

CORROSION PROTECTION
All structures shall be designed to resist corrosion in different zones defined Table-4 of
Appendix-II, in the following manner for the design life of the structures:
a) Corrosion Allowance
Extra steel shall be provided as corrosion allowance for structural members in the
splash zone. Refer Table 23 of Appendix II for allowance value for different
components.
b) Cathodic Protection
All steel surfaces in the submerged zone shall be protected against corrosion by a
sacrificial anode system. The design conditions pertaining to this system are given
in Specification for Cathodic Protection as per Appendix-IA.
c) Painting
Structural steel shall be painted as per protective coating specification listed in
Appendix-IA.
d) Structural Detailing
Areas and joints i.e. equipment skids etc. which are inaccessible for maintenance
and thereby susceptible to corrosion shall be suitably sealed by methods such as
boxing with plates etc.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 5 of 56

3.4.3

STRUCTURAL DESIGN

3.4.3.1

DESIGN PHILOSOPHY
A) General
Primary and major secondary steel work for the Topsides and jacket (including
foundations) shall be proportioned to ensure adequate strength and serviceability
throughout all phases of installation and in service condition.
i) The Jacket and Topsides shall be designed to withstand the extreme and
operating storms as specified in Table-6 & 7 of Appendix-II.
ii) Structure analysis and design shall be in accordance with the requirements of
API-RP 2A and AISC using working stress design method.
iii) Primary steel work include

Topsides All truss members, deck girders, crane pedestal and deck
legs.
Jacket

All legs, vertical/inclined bracing, horizontal bracing, launch

truss, main/skirt piles and skirt sleeves & framing.
iv) Topsides secondary steel shall include deck plating, grating, deck
beams/stringers, equipment support beams, walkways, stairs and hand railing,
ladder and access platform.
v) Jacket secondary steel shall include support for cathodic protection, boat
landing, barge bumper, walkways, casing and caissons, appurtenances and
their supports and mud-mats.
All structural analysis shall be performed using SACS 5.2 software. The extent of
analysis shall be to demonstrate the adequacy of the structures under all
envisaged phases and anticipated loading. Analysis shall include, but not limited
to:IN-SERVICE CONDITION
x In-place operating and extreme storm conditions
x Foundation design-Pile analysis and design
x Fatigue
x Seismic
x Accidental loads i.e. boat impact load
x Dropped object
PRE-SERVICE CONDITION
Fabrication
x Load-out
x Transportation & Sea fastening design
x Installation
Launch, Flotation and up-ending of Jacket
On bottom stability
Design of installation aids for substructure and topsides
Lifting analysis of topsides
Member stresses shall be checked at the ends of members and throughout their
spans in accordance with API-RP 2A. Structural design shall be based on working
stress method. Member stresses due to aspects which are not specifically covered
in the computer structural analysis shall be investigated by manual calculations
and results combined with computer results to ensure that the stress and
deflection limitations are not exceeded.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 6 of 56

All major structural framing shall meet the following guidelines:

Member slenderness ratio: kl/r <100. The buckling coefficient k, shall be

chosen for each member in accordance with API-RP 2A recommendations.
Rolled tubular member diameter to thickness ratio: 20 < D/t <60. For grouted
jacket legs and grouted skirt pile sleeves: 20 < D/t <100. Exceptions to this
criterion must be approved by Company. This criterion is not applicable to
seamless tubular.
Minimum thickness of jacket tubular member shall be 10mm. Minimum
thickness of deck tubular member shall be 8mm. Tubular member wall
thickness in splash zone shall not be less than 25 mm.
Pile diameter to thickness ratio: D/t <60.
Minimum nominal thickness of superstructure beam flanges & web, plates and
stiffeners shall be 6 mm.
Use of sections back-to-back, battened and lattice type built up sections shall
not be permitted, in order to avoid areas difficult for maintenance.
All joints in trusses and plan/vertical bracing systems shall have direct brace to
chord connection. Use of gusset type connection is not permitted (except in
secondary steel work).
Deck plate shall be chequered type with a raised pattern surface and the
minimum thickness shall be 8mm. For roof covering of deck, minimum plate
thickness shall be 6mm and shall have proper slope to check accumulation of
rainwater.
Clear span of plating and grating shall not exceed 1200mm.

B) Wave Slam
Horizontal members in the wave zone shall be designed for wave slam forces in
accordance with API-RP 2A. Bending stresses due to both horizontal and vertical
slam forces shall be investigated. However, the current velocity components shall
not be included in the wave kinematics when calculating wave slam loading. For Xbraces, members shall be assumed to span the full length. The slam coefficient, Cs,
shall be taken as 5.5.
C) Hydrostatic Collapse
All buoyant members including buoyancy tanks shall be checked for hydrostatic
collapse during pre-service conditions for higher of the two following cases:
i) Maximum water depth reached during pre-service operations, with a factor of
safety of 2.0.
ii) Accidental complete submergence condition i.e. hydrostatic pressure at mud
level with a factor of safety of 1.5.
iii) Tubular members shall be checked for in-service condition for hydrostatic
pressure and in-service stress interaction as per API-RP 2A. The factor of
safety for axial compression case shall be taken as 1.5 and 2.0 for extreme
and operating environmental conditions respectively. For earthquake condition
the factor of safety for axial compression case shall be taken as 1.2.
3.4.3.2 JOINT DESIGN
A) Tubular Joints
Tubular joint design and detailing for both pre-service and in-service conditions shall
be in accordance with API-RP 2A. Joints shall be designed and detailed as simple
joints as per API-RP 2A. Where overlap cannot be avoided, the minimum overlap
shall be determined as per API-RP 2A.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 7 of 56

B) Non-Tubular Joints
Hybrid joints, combining rolled wide flange sections with tubular sections as used in
module trusses, plate girder or wide flange joints shall be designed in accordance
with AISC using rational engineering methods. Truss brace to chord joints shall be
designed for transfer of axial loads from one brace to another across the truss chord
in shear. The web stiffeners shall be designed to carry in compression the permissible
axial tensile load of the brace. Use of gusset in these joint is not permitted except in
the case of secondary steel work.
C) Launch Leg Joints and Ring Stiffened Joints
Appropriate closed ring solutions shall be used to design ring stiffeners in launch leg
and at deck leg/girder intersections.
The effective width of the shell used to compute the effective section for ring stress
calculations for deck leg / girder intersections shall be:
1.1 (Dt)1/2
Where: D = outside diameter of the stiffened member
t = wall thickness of the stiffened member
Cross joints, Launch leg joints and other joints in which the load is transferred across
the chord shall be designed assuming an effective width of the chord equal to 1.25
times chord diameter, on each side from the centerline of the extreme incoming
braces, or length of the Joint-Can whichever is less.
3.4.3.3

PERMISSIBLE STRESSES AND FACTORS OF SAFETY

Unless otherwise noted in this Specification permissible stresses and factors of safety
shall be as recommended in API-RP 2A.

3.4.3.4

INCREASE IN PERMISSIBLE STRESSES

A one-third increase in the permissible stresses shall be allowed according to following
table:
__________________________________________________________
Load Condition
One-third Permissible Stress
Increase whether admissible
Global In-service
Extreme Environment
Yes
Operating Environment
No
Earthquake
Yes: See Note (1)
Global Preservice
Loadout
No
Transportation
Yes
Launch
No
On-Bottom Stability
No: See Note (2)
Lift
No
Local In-service
Extreme Environment
Yes
Operating Environment
No
Boat impact
Yes: See Note (3)
Wave Slam
Yes
Vessel Hydrotest
No
Local Preservice
Launch
No
Wave Slam
Yes
Mudmat & Supports
No: See Note (2)
Notes:
1) The basic permissible stresses shall be increased by 70 percent.
2) When installation sea state is included in calculation of member forces and stresses,
the one-third increase in permissible stresses is allowed.
3) No increase in allowable stresses shall be allowed for design of member welded to
the jacket .

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

3.4.3.5

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 8 of 56

IN-SERVICE DESIGN CONDITIONS

Platform in-service design shall be performed for the global and local load conditions in
accordance with the provisions given in this section.

3.4.3.5.1 Structure Dead Loads

The structure dead load shall include the weight of all deck plates, members, grating,
deck beams, girders and trusses.
3.4.3.5.2 Equipment Loads
Equipment loads shall include the weight of all equipments, bulks, piping and secondary
steel (other than decking). These loads are to be developed based on equipment
layouts. Two basic load conditions shall be considered for global design. These are:x Equipment dry weight
x Equipment operating weight
For local design, hydrotest weights shall be considered where applicable.
3.4.3.5.3 Crane Loads
Contractor shall determine the static & dynamic crane loads and use data provided by
the crane manufacturer. A minimum of 8 boom directions shall be considered.
3.4.3.5.4 Environmental Loading
Environmental parameters as defined in Table-6 & 7 of Appendix-II shall be applied to
maximize loading on all structural components. Analysis shall be performed for wave
approach along grid directions and selected diagonal directions.
a)

Wave & Current Forces

The design wave shall be treated as a regular wave and appropriate wave theory as
per API-RP 2A shall be used to compute water particle kinematics, using apparent
wave period computed as per API-RP 2A. A wave kinematics factor as given in
Table-5 of Appendix-II shall be used to account for wave directional spreading or
irregularity in wave profile shape.
The current speed in the vicinity of the platform shall be reduced by the current
blockage factors given in Table-5 of Appendix-II.
The wave particle kinematics multiplied by the wave kinematics factor and the
current velocities adjusted for blockage shall be added vectorially to obtain total
velocity vector at any point. The given current profile shall be treated as applicable
to water depth equal to still water level. For any other water level at different points
along the wave, the velocities shall be calculated based on linear stretching of the
current profile. Morison's equation applied to only the normal components of
velocity and acceleration shall be used to compute normal wave forces on the
individual members. The coefficients of drag and mass (inertia), CD and CM shall be
taken as 0.65 and 1.6 respectively for smooth surfaces and 1.05 and 1.2
respectively for rough surfaces.
Conductor shielding factor shall be considered on well platforms as per API RP-2A.
b) Wind Forces
The wind forces shall be calculated taking into consideration shielding, shape
coefficients and variation of wind velocity with height as specified in API-RP 2A.
Wind shall be assumed to act simultaneously and collinearly with wave and current
forces.
The following wind speeds shall be considered for design of various components:
i)
Jacket In-place Analysis
- 1 Hr Average
ii)
Deck In-place Analysis
- 1 Min. Average
iii) Cantilever Structures, towers, vents,
flare booms, bridges of length less than 50m - 3 Sec. gust
iv) Exterior Wall panels of buildings,
barrier walls, including their stiffeners
- 3 Sec. gust

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 9 of 56

3.4.3.5.5 Live Loads

The magnitudes of live loads to be used in the in-service analysis and design shall be as
defined in Table-11 of Appendix-II.
For global analysis and design, appropriate percentages of live loads given in Table-11
of Appendix-II shall be used as specified in respective load combination tables of Cl.
3.4.3.5.7.
3.4.3.5.6 Earthquake Loading
The earthquake loading on the combined jacket and deck structure shall be calculated
using the response spectrum method and in accordance with the provisions of API-RP
2A.
Contribution of the marine growth in the added mass shall be considered in the analysis.
Refer Appendix-III for earthquake related parameters.
3.4.3.5.7 Platform Global/Local Loading Conditions
The platforms are to be designed to resist loadings derived from environment loads,
earthquake ground motion and gravity loads in accordance with this section.
A) Jacket Analysis
The in-place integral - structural analysis of the idealized deck - jacket - pile - soil
system shall be performed as a minimum for following loading combinations:
Load Combination No.1 : Extreme storm condition with operating loads.
Load Combination No.2 : Operating storm condition with operating loads.
Load Combination No.3 : Extreme storm condition with empty equipment to check
the capacity of the piling under the maximum uplift force.
Load Combination No. 4 : Earthquake with operating loads.
The structural model for the jacket analysis shall include all structural members of
the jacket and all-primary trusses and frames of the deck. Deck plate and secondary
beams shall be modeled to incorporate in-plane shear restraint.
The storm load analysis shall be conducted for a minimum of eight storm approach
angles each for combination No.1, No.2 and No.3. Critical storm approach angles
shall be selected so as to result in maximum tension/compression in various piles.
In case the selected wave approach direction is within + 10 degrees of the standard
wave approach directions for which the environmental data has been furnished,
such data shall be directly used for the selected wave approach direction. For other
cases, the data shall be linearly interpolated between the two adjacent directions for
which data has been furnished. Earthquake forces wherever applicable shall be
taken as occurring in both the direction (simultaneously).
Stiffness of boat landing, barge bumper, risers, conductors, caissons, mudmat etc
shall be ignored during analysis & design. However dead weight and environmental
forces on all of above shall be considered in analysis and design of Jacket.
Still water depth shall be taken as (CD) + (LAT) + (50% of Astronomical Tide) +
(Storm Surge) for Storm Environment. For Earthquake Condition still water level
shall be considered as (CD) + (LAT) + (50% of Astronomical Tide).
In summary the design load combinations for jacket analysis shall be as given in
Table-A.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 10 of 56

TABLE A (Jacket)

LOAD CASE

LOAD COMBINATION AS SUM OF LOAD CASE

PERCENTAGE
1a

1b

2a

2b

Extreme Strom Wind, Wave & current

100

100

NA

NA

100

NA

Operating Strom Wind, Wave & current

NA

NA

100

100

NA

NA

Structural Dead Loads & Buoyancy

100

100

100

100

100

100

Equipment & Piping Dead Weight

100

100

100

100

Equipment & Piping Operating Contents

Weight

100

100

100

Open Deck area live load

50

100

50

Uniformly distributed area live load

(Blanket Live Load)

60

60

Loading/unloading area of deck

60

60

60

60

60

Crane dead load

100

100

100

100

100

100

Riser dead loads

100

100

100

100

100

100

Reaction from bridge excluding walkway

live load

100

100

100

100

100

100

Reaction from Modules

100

100

100

100

100

100

Earthquake loadings

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

100

Modular Rig Load

(excluding hook load)

100

100

100

100

100

Notes:
1.
2.
3.

4.

For uplift condition of jacket and piles only weights of permanently placed
equipment and piping shall be considered.
Disturbed soil condition due to jack up Rig leg penetration shall be considered.
The jacket shall be separately checked considering load combination for
a) Jack up rig operation
b) Modular rig operation
For Modular rig operation, critical drilling package/mast location on well slot shall be
considered along with storm environments.

B) Deck Analysis
The entire deck structure including all primary trusses and frames with a portion of
jacket structure extending at least up to the second horizontal framing level shall be
analyzed as 3-dimensional space frame. Deck plating and secondary beams shall
be modeled to incorporate in-plane shear restraint. The level of detail in the model
shall be consistent with the applied loads. All appurtenances contributing to
wind/wave loading shall be properly accounted for in the analysis. Structural
interaction between deck and building/helideck modules need not be considered.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 11 of 56

Deck structural analysis shall be carried out as a minimum for the following loading
combinations:
Load Combination No.1&2 : Extreme storm condition with operating loads.
Load Combination No.3&4 : Operating storm condition with operating loads.
Load Combination No.5
: Normal operating loads plus crane operating loads.
Load Combination No. 6
: Earthquake with operating loads.
Load Combination No.7 & 8 : Local design & deflection check.
Analysis for load combination Nos.1 to 4 shall be carried out for 8-storm approach
directions as taken for substructure analysis.
Still water depth to be considered shall be same as for substructure analysis.
In summary the load conditions shall be as given in Table-B.
TABLE B (Deck)
LOAD CASE
Extreme Storm Wind, Wave &
Current
Operating Storm Wind, Wave &
Current

LOAD COMBINATION AS SUM OF LOAD CASE

PERCENTAGE
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
100

100

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

100

100

NA

NA

NA

Deck Structural Dead Loads

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Equipment & Piping Dead

Weight

100

100

100

100

100

Equipment & Piping Operating

Contents Weight

100

100

100

100

100

Open Deck area live load

100

100

100

50

100

Uniformly distributed area live

load (Blanket Live Load)

75

75

100

Deck Grated areas (excluding

well head grated area)

50

50

50

100

100

Loading/Unloading area of
Deck

100

100

100

100

100

60

100

100

Crane dead loads

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Reaction from bridge including

walkway live load

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Reaction from Modules

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Earthquake Loading

NA

NA

NA

NA

NA

100

NA

NA

Modular Rig(excluding hook

load)

100

100

100

100

100

100

100

Crane operating loads

Notes:
1. For earthquake analysis loading on deck shall be considered same as for
substructure analysis.
2. Deck crane operating loads shall be considered for 8 orientations of boom in
combination with deck equipment and piping operating loads.
3. For Load case 7 and 8 Hook load shall be included.
4. For Modular rig operation, loads from drilling package/mast shall be considered
separately at each well location along with storm environment. For earth quake
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 12 of 56

loading, loads from drilling package/mast shall be considered at well slots A, D, L N,

O, and P to maximize loads on capping beam supports. (Refer attached sketch in
Annexure II of Appendix III.)
C) Building Module Frame Analysis
Not used
D) Living Quarter Module Frame Analysis
Not used
E)

Helideck Analysis
The primary trusses and frames of the deck in the helideck area shall be also
checked for the following load combinations:
Load Combination No.1a and 1b
Without helicopter static loads on helideck - appropriate live load on entire main
deck and other dead and live loads under extreme/operating storm conditions.
Load Combination No.2 (Static helicopter under operating storm condition)
Static helicopter load at the centre of helideck plus appropriate live load on entire
helideck, other platforms, stairs and landings in combination with operating storm
conditions.
Load Combination No.3 (Helicopter landing condition)
Helicopter landing loads at different landing positions with wheels at least 1.5
metres away from any edge of the helideck plus appropriate dead and live loads
(except on helideck).
Load Combination No. 4 Local design and deflection check.
In summary the loads to be considered for various combinations are given in TableE.
TABLE-E (Helideck)

LOAD CASE

LOAD COMBINATION AS SUM OF LOAD CASE

PERCENTAGE
1a

1b

Extreme storm wind

100

NA

NA

NA

NA

Operating storm wind

NA

100

100

NA

NA

Structural dead loads and dead loads of

solar panel platform, fire fighting platform
and equipments

100

100

100

100

100

Uniformly distributed area live loads on

helideck (Blanket Load)

75

75

100

100

Static helicopter load

NA

NA

100

NA

NA

Landing condition load

NA

NA

NA

100

NA

Live loads on Grated areas

50

50

50

100

Live load on Solar panel platform and fire

fighting platform

50

50

50

100

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 13 of 56

Notes:
1. Eight wind directions shall be considered for extreme and operating storm
conditions.
2. Wind loads on Solar panels shall be included in the analysis (where applicable).
3. The blanket live load for cases 1a and 1b shall be same as that applicable for deck
4. The above load combination shall be considered in conjunction with load
combination 1 to 4, 7, and 8 of Table B appropriately.

3.4.3.5.8

Fatigue Design
A) General
The tubular joints of the platforms subjected to repetition of stress due to the
cyclic nature of wave loading shall be analyzed for fatigue endurance in
accordance with API-RP 2A. A deterministic fatigue analysis using PalmgrenMiners hypothesis of linear cumulative damage shall be used to predict the
fatigue lives of structural connections.
B) Fatigue Life
The in-service fatigue design life of the joints shall be at least two times the
service life of the platform except for the joints at second framing level from the
top, where the design fatigue life shall be four times the service life of the
platform.
C) Loading
i) The environmental parameters to be used for computing the wave loading in
the fatigue analysis shall be as given in Table-9 of Appendix-II. The 25
years wave exceedance diagram for eight directions shall be as given in
Table-10 of Appendix-II.
ii) Still water depth for fatigue analysis shall be taken as (CD) + (LAT) + half
the Astronomical Tide as given in Table-6 of Appendix-II.
iii) Wave forces shall be computed in accordance with the procedure described
in Cl. 3.4.3.5.4. However, current may be neglected, and therefore
considerations for apparent wave period and current blockage are not
required. In addition, wave kinematics factor equal to 1.0 and conductor
shielding factor equal to 1.0 shall be applied to fatigue waves. The
coefficient of drag and mass shall be taken as 0.5 and 2.0 for smooth
surfaces and 0.8 and 2.0 for rough surfaces. Marine growth shall be as
given in Table-4 of Appendix-II.
iv) All eight-wave directions shall be considered in the analysis. For each
direction a minimum of four wave heights shall be used to compute stress
range versus wave height relationship. The directions, wave heights and
exceedances selected shall be those closest to the directions indicated in
Table-9 & 10 of Appendix-II.
v) For estimation of the fatigue life, the 18 phase angles to be selected at
equal step of 20 degrees.
vi) Dynamic amplification effects shall be taken into account in calculation of the
wave loading where the period of the first mode of vibration of the structure
is less than 3 seconds. Detail Wave Response Analysis to be performed if
first mode is over 3 seconds.
vii) Where significant cyclic stresses may be induced by the action of wind,
wave slamming, changes in member buoyancy, etc. Such stresses shall be
combined with those due to wave action to obtain the total effective stress
spectrum for a particular member or joint.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 14 of 56

D) Analysis Procedure
i) The fatigue analysis shall be performed for all joints, which determine the
safety and reliability of all the steel work of the structure. Particular attention
shall be paid to joints in the top one-third of the jacket structure including
deck legs and bottom horizontal brace level.
ii) For each joint and type of failure under consideration the stress range
spectra shall be computed at a minimum of 8 positions around the joint
periphery to ensure that the point of maximum damage and hence lowest
fatigue life is considered. For computation of fatigue damage the stress
range versus wave height diagram for each wave approach direction shall
be divided into a minimum of 10 blocks and the damage computed for each
block shall be summed up.
iii) For each circular tubular joint two types of failure brace to weld failure and
chord to weld failure should be considered, using the appropriate stress
concentration factors.
iv) For joints other than those between tubular members, individual detailed
consideration shall be given with due regard being paid to published,
reliable experimental data.
E)

Stress Concentration Factors (SCF)

i) The hot spot stresses ranges at the joints on the brace and chord side of the
weld used to estimate the fatigue lives shall be determined from.
Hot spot stress range = FRa .SCFa +
Where FRa, FRi and FRo are the brace nominal axial, in-plane bending
and out-of-plane being stress ranges and SCFa, SCFi and SCFo are the
corresponding stress concentration factors for axial, in-plane bending and
out-of-plane bending stresses for the chord side or the brace side.
ii) The fatigue life on both the brace and chord side of the weld may be
calculated with one of the following methods for obtaining the SCF applied
to the brace nominal stresses:
a)
i) For K Joints
Formula proposed by J.G. Kuang et al Stress Concentration in
Tubular Joints (Society of Petroleum Engg. Aug. 1977).
ii) For T, Y and X Joints
Formula proposed by A.C. Wordsworth and G.P. Smedley Stress
concentration in Un-stiffened Tubular Joints select seminar on
European Offshore steel Research, November 1978.
b) Finite Element based formula proposed for K, T, Y & X joints by
Efthymiou may be used in lieu of those given in (a) and (b) above.
iii) Ring Stiffened Joints
In lieu of more accurate procedure for analysis these may be checked as
for simple joints but using modified chord thickness. The effect of ring
stiffeners is two fold:
a) An increase in area of the chord, which may be accounted for by
calculating the area of the chord shell plus stiffener and from this the
effective shell thickness, which by itself will give the same area.
b) An increase in the stiffness of the chord which may be accounted for by
calculating the moment of inertia of the chord shell plus stiffener and
from this the effective shell thickness, which by itself would give the
same moment of inertia.
For external ring-stiffened joints, a minimum stress concentration factor
of 6.0 shall be used in brace member as per API-RP2A.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 15 of 56

iv) Overlap joints / gusset plate Stiffened Joints

A minimum stress concentration factor of 6.0 shall be used in brace
member as per API-RP2A in lieu of detailed analysis.
v) Effect of grouted pile in jacket leg joints may be considered appropriately
for evaluation of S.C.F. Formulae proposed by Marshall & Kinra (Refer
Fatigue analysis of Cognac Platform Paper No. OTC 3378, 1979) may be
used. Any other established formulae may also be used with prior approval
of the Company.
F) S-N Curves
The basic S-N curves to be used in the evaluation of fatigue life shall be the API
WJ (without weld profile) curve. The thickness correction effect as specified in
latest API-RP 2A is applicable. Factors for weld improvement may be used with
corresponding joint preparation as per API-RP 2A for joints having a computed
fatigue life using WJ curve greater than half the required fatigue life.
G) Marking of Joints
The Contractor shall identify the joints with the computed in-service fatigue life
less than six times the service life at second framing level from top and four
times the service life at other framing levels of the platform. These joints shall
be marked with neoprene based Cupro-Nickel embedded sheets for future
inspection purposes.
Identification marking shall be easily accessible for divers and a minimum gap
of 250mm shall be maintained between the identified joint and the marking. A
drawing marking of all such joints shall be prepared.
3.4.3.5.9

Foundation Design
The platform shall be founded on open-ended pipe piles driven through the jacket
legs and/or skirt sleeves. The pile foundation analysis and design for in-service
conditions shall use the geo-technical data mentioned in Table-13 of Appendix-II.
Factor of safety for pile axial capacity shall be 1.5 for extreme storm condition and
2.0 for operating condition.
All necessary data for any particular pile size shall be generated based on the data
furnished in the soil report.
The design shall also conform to the following:
a) Scour
The scour around jacket leg/piling shall follow the soil consultants report. A
minimum scour depth of 1.5 times the pile diameter shall be used.
b) Under drive and Overdrive Allowance
The pile wall thickness make-up shall be designed to allow for the possibility of
pile driving refusal prior to design penetration and overdrive beyond design
penetration. The under drive and overdrive allowance shall be as per design
requirement subjected to a minimum of 5m and 3m respectively.
c) Pile Group Effect
For piles groups as clusters, pile group effect shall be considered as per API-RP
2A.

3.4.3.5.10

Local Superstructure Design

A) Deck Plate and Grating Design
The local design of plating and grating for decks and modules (excluding helideck
plating) shall be based on applicable loads defined in Table-11 of Appendix-II.
Plates shall be reinforced if concentrated loads are directly placed on plating.
Local design shall be performed for all types of concentrated load applied on
either deck plate or secondary beams for their adequacy checks.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 16 of 56

B) Beam and Plate Girder Design

The local design of beams and plate girders shall be based on the applicable
loads defined in Table-11 of Appendix-II. These items shall also be checked for
loading due to hydro test conditions.
Deflections shall be limited to criteria based on equipment operating
requirements specified by equipment suppliers or the following, whichever is less:
Both Ends supported - L/360
Cantilever
- L/180
Where L is the member length
For beams supporting vibrating equipment the static deflections shall be
restricted to 70% of the values specified above.
Plate girders shall be designed in accordance with AISCs Specification for the
Design Fabrication and Erection of Structural Steel for Buildings, and shall
incorporate the following guidelines:

All plate girders shall be compact sections as defined by AISC.

Top and bottom flanges at a given section shall be of the same grade of
steel and symmetric about the beams axes.
The yield strength of the flanges, webs and stiffeners shall be the same.
The dimensions and thickness shall be so proportioned that longitudinal and
transverse web stiffeners are not required.

C) Handrails
All handrails shall be as per Standard no. 7-60-0801.
D) Walkways, Stairways and Landings
Minimum width shall be 750mm for well platform. Stairways shall be designed
with adequate width to maneuver a stretcher up and down the stairs. All stairs
extending to the jacket walkway level shall be adjustable in length to suit site
conditions.
Walkways, stairways and landings shall be designed for the following load
combinations.
No 1 Dead load plus live loads defined in Table 11 of Appendix II
No 2 Dead load plus extreme 3sec wind gust and/or extreme storm maximum
wave which ever is applicable.
All gratings shall be as per Standard no. 7-60-0802.
All stairways shall be as per Standard no. 7-60-0803.
E) Crane Pedestals
Crane pedestals and the supporting structure shall be designed in accordance
with the strength and fatigue provisions of API-RP 2A and API Spec 2C, except
that the impact factors shall conform to design requirements for the cranes. The
supporting structure is defined as the pedestal and all members directly
connected to the pedestal. The material for pedestal shall be API Spec. 2HGr.50 steel. The deflection of the top of pedestal from the supporting deck shall
be limited to L/200 under design loads, where L is the height above the deck.
Crane pedestal shall be located in elevation and plan such that the crane
operator will have a clear line of vision to the decks of supply boats and to
cargo landing zones on the platform.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 17 of 56

F) Design for Mechanical Vibration

Elements in the superstructure that support vibrating equipment shall be
designed so that the natural frequency of the supporting system is either less
than 70% or greater than 140% of any equipment operating frequency.
The three-dimensional space frame computer model used to investigate the
elements of the superstructure for vibration shall accurately represent the
structural system.
``
G) Antenna Mounting Facility
Suitable walkways are to be provided to reach antenna location. Contractor
shall design all antenna mounting facilities limiting the deflections of the stand.
H)

Access Platform
Access platform shall be provided, where required to allow personnel easy and
safe access in elevated locations.

I)

Fire Protection
The fire ratings for the firewall partitions as covered in the scope of work for
walls, ceilings and floors shall be determined by Contractor through the platform
safety case/risk assessment studies. The fire protection system for firewalls
shall comply with the specification Passive Fire Protection for fixed offshore
platforms. Minimum fire ratings for walls & floor for different area shall be as
per Table-19 of Appendix-II.

J)

Skid Shoe Design

The following should be considered:
a) The skid shoes should be designed such that the module reaction forces
are spread evenly onto the skid rail. The maximum allowable applied load
for the skid rail shall be nominated by Contractor.
b) The skid shoes should be designed to meet the dimensional requirements
of the skid rails in the construction yard, as established by Contractor.
c) At the tugging points, a safety factor of 2.0 shall be applied to the
attachment points and the structure local to the attachment point.
Consideration should be given to the effects of any eccentrically applied
loads.
d) No increase in basic allowable member stresses is permitted.

K) Equipment supports & service supports

All equipment supports, pipe supports and other services support steel work
shall be designed to withstand the operating & hydro test loads specified on the
supplier documents. For the transportation condition, in lieu of a detailed
analysis, the following inertia loads may be used as a minimum design load
case:

Horizontal acceleration
Vertical acceleration

0.7g

=
+0.2g/-0.2g
In addition self-weight shall also be included.
For seismic consideration refer Appendix III.
3.4.3.5.11

Local Substructure Design

Appurtenances in the wave zone shall be designed to withstand environmental
loading. Pre-installed appurtenances shall also be designed to withstand pre-service
loadings including, but not limited to transportation, launch or lift and vibrations
caused by pile driving. Appurtenances shall also be designed for additional
requirements, if any (i.e. integrated/removable etc.) as per project specific
requirements, specified in Appendix-III.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 18 of 56

a)

Boat Landing
Boat landing shall be provided in minimum three steps. Boat landings
associated connections, and local framing shall be designed for boat impact
loads, environmental loads, uniform live loads and dead loads. Boat landing
shall be designed for the following load combinations:
i) Dead load + Live Load of 500 kg/m2 on each landing.
ii) Dead load + Boat impact load at different points on the berthing face.
iii) Dead load + Extreme environmental load.
Boat impact load shall be such as to absorb impact energy of 3.0 TM in the
system. For structural design the load shall be treated as a concentrated
load.
Vertical fenders along berthing face of the boat landings shall be provided.
Mooring bollards shall be provided near each end of the boat landings for
supply vessel mooring. Two swing ropes shall be provided near the mid
point of each landing, one at the face of the landing and the other 1 meter
seawards of the landing face and about 1 meter apart horizontally. Swing
ropes shall be supported from the lower deck structure. Proper
arrangements for replacing the swing ropes shall be provided.
The boat landing shall be detailed such that there shall be no interference
with other items of substructure such as risers, barge bumpers etc, during
installation or operation. Since the boat landings are designed to be field
installed, the design and detailing shall cater to an adjustment of landing
levels by r 1.0 meter with respect to the jacket. Landing levels of boat
landing shall be maintained as shown in the drawings.
Analysis of jacket framing members shall be carried out for the boat impact
loads on barge bumper. For this purpose the force equal to the rated load of
the shock cell shall be applied at both the shock cell support points. No onethird increase in permissible stress shall be allowed in jacket framing
member for this analysis.

b)

Barge Bumper
Barge bumper shall be designed for the following loadings:
i) Vessel impact direct in the middle 1/3 height of post.
Energy to be absorbed in the system shall be 30.4 TM (as a minimum
requirement)
ii) Vessel impact lateral in the middle 1/3 height of post.
Energy to be absorbed in the system shall be 11 TM (as a minimum
requirement).
For structural design the load shall be treated as a concentrated load. Local
denting of the vertical post shall be neglected. The bumper post shall be of
API spec 2H-Gr50 steel. Barge bumpers shall be mounted on shock cells. It
is permissible to integrate the design of boat landing and barge bumper. The
design criteria as mentioned above for each component shall be applicable.

c)

Riser Protectors
Not used

d)

Sump Caissons and Pump Casings

Sump caissons and pump casings shall be designed to withstand all
environmental and operating loadings. The supporting members and their
connections to the jacket framing shall be sized to have twice the required
strength.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

e)

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 19 of 56

Shear Keys on Skirt Piles and Sleeves (for Grouted Skirt Piles)
Provision of shear keys on skirt piles and the skirt pile sleeves is a
mandatory requirement. Shear keys shall be designed in accordance with
the following considerations:
a) Load transfer should be considered only through the length over which
the shear keys of both pile and sleeve overlap including under drive /
overdrive conditions.
b) Design value of 28 days cube strength of grout (fg) shall be taken as 281
kg/cm2.
c) Design value of characteristic interface shear strength (ki) shall be
considered as per following formula and limitations:

CL* * E (/Rp + h * (tp*fg0.3/Rp)0.5/16s)

ki =

---------------------------------------------------------Rp/tp + E * tg/(Eg *Rp) +Rs/(ts+(Eg/E)*tg)

0.7

height of surface irregularities, local out of roundness etc.

/Rp

0.00025

Rp

Pile outer radius

Rs

Sleeve inner radius

tp

Pile Tube thickness

ts

Sleeve Tube thickness

tg

Grout thickness

Shear key outstand dimension

Shear key width dimension

Spacing of shear key

Modulus of elasticity Steel = 210,000 N/sq-mm

Eg

Modulus of elasticity Grout = 150 fg

fg

CL

1.0 for L/Dp = 2

0.9 for L/Dp = 4

0.8 for L/Dp = 8

0.7 for L/Dp t12

Compressive strength of Grout

Intermediate values for L/Dp may be found by linear interpolation.

L

Grout connection length

Dp

Pile Diameter = 2 Rp

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 20 of 56

Limitations:5d

Rp/tp

d 30

9d

Rs/ts

d 70

0d

h/s

d 0.04

4d

L/Rp

1.5 d

w/h

d 3

1.4(Rptp)0.5

d s

Factor of safety for estimation of design interface shear strength shall be as follows:For Extreme condition
=
4.5
For Operating condition
=
6.0
Note :- Requirement of shear keys on main piles and jacket legs shall also be
examined when the main piles are provided in a cluster with more than one skirt
pile.
3.4.3.6
3.4.3.6.1

PRE-SERVICE DESIGN CONDITIONS

General
The platform components shall be checked and designed as required for pre-service
loading conditions such as load-out, transportation, launch, lift, floatation and
upending on bottom stability and pile installation.
Engineering and design for pre-service conditions shall be performed under the
following heads for each module/component:
a) Engineering for Load-Out.
b) Engineering for Transportation
c) Engineering for Installation

3.4.3.6.2

Engineering for Load-Out and Transportation

The design of all structures shall accommodate the forces imposed during Load-Out
and transportation. The weight of all pre-installed rigging and ship loose items shall
be included as applicable.
Engineering for Load-Out and transportation shall include the following analyses:
i) Load-Out Analysis
ii) Transportation Analysis and Sea Fastening Design
iii) Design of any temporary members/props required during loadout/transportation.

3.4.3.6.2.1

Load-Out Analysis
All structures shall be checked for the loads applied during load-out. The proposed
method of load out shall be determined by the Contractor and could be by means of
continuous or discrete skids, wheel trolleys or by direct lifting. The following should
be considered:a) Dry loads only should be used, together with weights for all preinstalled lifting
gear, sea-fastenings, loose ship items etc. The loads should be based on
Weight Control Report.
b) For lifted load-out, refer to the criteria described in Lift Installation Loads Cl.
3.4.3.6.3.1
c) For skidded or trolley load out

Total loss of vertical support at one support location with the structure being
supported by remaining support locations only.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 21 of 56

Structures shall be loaded out onto the transportation barge by means of launch
ways, continuous or discrete skids and wheeled trolleys. The structures shall be
checked for adequacy for the proposed load-out operation and for the effects of the
localized locations resulting from change in slope of launch ways/tracks and the
change in draft of the transportation barge as the structure moves on to it. For
substructure loaded out on launch cradle this analysis shall cover the front end of
launch cradle unsupported for various distance (barge move downward), and two
ends of launch trusses supported (barge move upward).
For structures loaded out on discrete skids or wheeled trolleys, the analysis shall
cover cases due to loss of support of one or more supports, including three point
support conditions.
For other means of load out the analysis shall be based on the support conditions
likely to be experienced.
If the support conditions envisaged during weighing of the deck/module are different
from those considered for load-out analysis, a separate analysis shall be performed
with appropriate support conditions to ensure adequacy of the structure during
weighing operations.
3.4.3.6.2.2

Transportation Analysis and Sea-fastening Design

The design of all structures shall accommodate the forces imposed during
transportation. The computer analysis shall be performed in accordance with the
ABS or any other International Certifying agency rules along with the provisions
given herein.
A preliminary transportation analysis shall be performed to ensure that the structure
being transported is able to withstand the maximum anticipated stresses during
transportation. For this purpose the following minimum barge response
characteristics as per Noble Denton criteria shall be assumed:
Single Amplitude ( in 10 Sec. period)
Barge Type
ROLL (R)

PITCH (P)

HEAVE (H)

Small cargo barge [76 m LOA or 23 m beam]

r25o

r15o

r0.2g

Large barges

r20o

r12.5o

r0.2g

Small vessels (see note 2)

r30o

r15o

r0.2g

In addition to the above self weight (W) of the structure shall also be considered.
Following load combination shall be considered:i)
rPrH+W
ii)
rRrH+W
Note:
1) No allowance shall be made for friction to reduce sea fastening forces.
2) 20% shall be added to the loadings resulting from pitch motions for small
vessels to cover the effects of slamming.
The final transportation and barge motion analysis shall be performed after
finalization of barge data & transportation plan. If the max barge response/structural
load exceeds the loads considered in the preliminary analysis or if support
conditions are different from those considered in the preliminary analysis, the
structural analysis shall be repeated to ensure structural adequacy for the
transportation.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 22 of 56

The final transportation analysis shall consist of the following:

I.

Static Stability of Barge/Structure System:

a) Intact condition
b) Damaged condition with at least any one compartment of barge flooded.
Sustained wind speeds of 148 kmph and 93 kmph shall be considered for
calculating the wind forces on the barge freeboard and cargos surface area for
Intact and Damaged conditions respectively. Wind forces shall be calculated as
per ABS Rules.
The following Barge Stability Criteria shall be satisfied:
i) The positive range of stability (ignoring strength or down flooding
considerations) shall be in the range of 30 to 40.
ii) The righting energy available to resist capsizing shall be at least 1.4 times
the energy required by the design wind to heel the vessel to the same
critical angle.
II. Dynamic Motion Response Analysis for Barge/Structure System:
In order to determine the maximum loads imposed on the structure and seafastenings during the course of voyage from fabrication yard to offshore site an
analysis of the dynamic motion response for the structure/barge system shall be
performed. This analysis, shall include the following phases:
a) Determination of fundamental periods of Roll, Pitch, Heave, Yaw, Surge and
Sway motions.
b) Response of the system for various sea states.
(Ref.: Ocean Wave Statistics by N. Hogben and P.E. Lumb/ Global Wave
Statistics.)
The following shall be considered for the route specific dynamic motion
analysis:
i) Wave direction: Beam, Head and Quartering Seas.
ii) The maximum sea state to be considered shall depend upon route of tow
and season of tow.
The environmental conditions to be considered shall be based on an
average recurrence period of not less than ten years for the season of year
when the tow will take place.
iii) In order to obtain the maximum acceleration response, at least three sets of
periods shall be chosen for the maximum sea state for each direction of
approach depending upon the dynamic characteristics of the barge/structure
system and the towing speed of barge.
iv) A reduced wave height (less than the maximum)/period combination, if that
is likely to result in near resonant response conditions.
After obtaining the maximum response for various sea states, the structure shall
be analyzed for the corresponding maximum inertia/gravity forces.
Based on the above analysis, the design of sea fastening and the preparation of
detailed sea fastening drawings shall be carried out.
However barge response characteristics as per Noble-Denton requirement
indicated above shall be met as minimum requirement for checking structural
adequacy of structure and sea fastening
All engineering related to load out and transportation shall be approved by a
Marine Warranty Surveyor as per the bid package.
3.4.3.6.2.3

Design of Temporary Members/Props

Temporary members/props and other aids for load-out, transportation and
installation shall be designed to ensure that there is no overstressing or damage to
any permanent member of structure during pre service operations. Temporary
members/sea fasteners shall be always connected to the main structure through
doubler plate, location and orientation to be related to facilitate easy removal.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 23 of 56

3.4.3.6.3

Engineering for Installation

Engineering for installation shall include but not be limited to the following analyses
as applicable:
Jacket and Piles
i)
Lifting analysis of jacket
ii)
Launch analysis
iii) Flotation and Upending analysis
iv) On-bottom stability
v)
Pile installation analysis
vi) Design of Installation aids for jackets
Superstructure
i)
Lifting analysis of components/modules
ii)
Design of Installation Aids for superstructure
All the engineering for installation shall be reviewed and approved by the Installation
Contractor and Marine Warranty Surveyor.

3.4.3.6.3.1

Lifting Analysis of Jacket

Not used

3.4.3.6.3.2

Launch Analysis
A) Launch Trajectory Analysis
Three-dimensional launch simulation analysis shall be performed to determine
the jacket stability, bottom clearance, and barge-jacket behavior during
launching operations.
Three-dimensional launch trajectory analyses shall be performed that considers
as a minimum, the following variation in basic parameters:
Launch Weight
: (-) 3% to (+) 5% of the datum jacket weight
Longitudinal Center of Gravity : 1% of length of jacket towards top & bottom
of jacket, or 1m whichever is more
Barge Trim
: (-) 50% to (+) 50% of the selected trim
Coefficient of Friction
: (+) 25% of estimated value
Higher value of variation in the above parameters may be studied if so required.
Sufficient combinations of the above basic parameters shall be analyzed to
produce the worst-case launch scenario. A minimum mud-line clearance of 8m
at both top and bottom of the jacket shall be ensured during the entire launch
operation.
B) Launch Stress Analysis
Launch stress analysis shall be performed for different positions of the jacket on
the launch barge, which result in determination of sizes of different components
of the launch truss. The applied loading to the structure shall include the jacket
weight, buoyancy, inertial forces, hydrodynamic forces, and reactions from the
barge. The rocker beam load distribution shall account for the relative stiffness of
the rocker beam and launch leg, and shall satisfy moment equilibrium constraints
on the rocker beam.
C) Wave Slam
Members with a longitudinal axis, which enter the water within 15 degrees of
horizontal, shall be checked for slam effects using predicted velocities from the
launch analysis.

3.4.3.6.3.3

Flotation and Upending

Flotation and upending analysis shall be performed to investigate stability, bottom
clearance, derrick vessel hook loads and flooding water requirements at successive
stages to raise the structure from its natural floating position to an upright position
up to the final placement of the jacket on the seabed. A minimum bottom clearance

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 24 of 56

of 3 meters shall be maintained throughout the upending operation before the jacket
is placed at bottom.
Minimum reserve buoyancy over the datum weight of 12% shall be ensured in the
design. It shall also be ensured that with any one buoyancy component fully flooded,
the reserve buoyancy shall be minimum of 6%. If the structure does not have
sufficient buoyancy, the flotation analysis shall also determine the additional
auxiliary buoyancy requirements such as buoyancy tanks, which shall be designed,
fabricated and installed.
3.4.3.6.3.4

On-Bottom Stability
The jacket shall be designed to stay in a stable and vertical position till the
completion of piling operation. This shall be achieved by a combination of controlled
flooding and provision of mud-mats.
The penetration of the jacket leg/skirt sleeves into the seabed shall be investigated
for sandy topsoil conditions, for jacket loads anticipated before/during initial piling
operations. If the legs cannot penetrate in soil with adequate margin in the loads,
suitable modifications in the design shall be incorporated so that the anticipated
design elevations of the jacket top are achieved. Any slope in the seabed shall be
taken into account in the design as specified in Cl. 3.4.2.6
The on bottom stability calculations and mud-mat sizing shall be based on the
following loading combinations:
1. Jacket on bottom with all legs flooded as for upending analysis or as
determined for stability.
2. Weight of pile strings imposed on the jacket. The weight and locations of these
pile strings shall consider the pile installation sequence, which must be agreed
to by Company.
3. Bearing Pressure check shall be based on maximum jacket weight i.e. with all
relevant contingency. The safety against overturning, shall be based on
minimum jacket weight i.e. (without contingency for structural steel and mill
tolerance and contingency for other loads shall not be considered. Factor of
safety against sliding shall be based on maximum base shear during
installation.
4. Following Factor of Safety are to be considered:
Soil bearing pressure check without environmental loading = 2.0
Soil bearing pressure check with environmental loading = 1.5
Overturning = 1.5
Sliding = 1.5
Allowable soil resistance against sliding shall be calculated as per APIRP 2A.
Local design of mud-mat plating and associated support framing shall be based on
i) Allowable bearing pressure in case of clay topsoil
ii) Computed maximum bearing pressure in case of sandy topsoil
Both still water and installation environmental conditions shall be considered.
Still water depth shall be taken as CD + LAT + 50% Astronomical Tide.
Environmental parameters for installation conditions shall be as given in Table-8 of
Appendix-II.
Material for mud-mat shall be as given in Table-15 of Appendix-II.

3.4.3.6.3.5

Pile Installation
A) Driveability
Based on preliminary driveability studies, the Contractor to list set of hammers
proposed to be mobilized by him as per Table-16 of Appendix-II. The pile
drivability shall be performed using stress wave equation procedure to ensure
that the piles are drivable to the design penetration. This analysis shall also

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 25 of 56

confirm the pile wall thickness requirements and add-on lengths of the piles
from drivability, dynamic and static stress considerations.
For this purpose the analysis shall be done for each type of pile and for each
combination of pile geometry and hammer at discrete penetrations for the full
length of each pile.
The parameters to be used for driveability analysis shall be as per Table-17 of
Appendix-II.
B) Pile Section Lengths
Preliminary pile section lengths shall be selected in accordance with API-RP
2A. Pile stick-up lengths shall be limited to kl/r < 200. Consideration shall also
be given to the proposed marine spread and the allowable stick-up length for
the hammers to be used. The pile make-up shall be planned to avoid pile addons when the pile tip is nearer than 3m from a stratum where hard driving is
expected (such as granular soil layer).
C) Pile Run Down Evaluation
The pile run down evaluation shall be performed under the following conditions
as a minimum requirement. However, any other method suitable to the pertinent
soil conditions may be employed to estimate pile run down.
i) When soil resistance (SRD) is less than the static weight of pile/hammer.
ii) When total work done by the pile against soil resistance (SRD) is less than
the potential energy lost by the pile due to free drop.
iii) When blow count during initial driving is less than two blows per 30 cm.
3.4.3.6.3.6

Design of Installation Aids for Jacket

The minimum requirements for the different installation aids for jacket are given in
this section. All installation aids to suit the method of installation shall be designed
for the anticipated function and loads. Applicable requirements of API-RP 2A shall
be followed.
A.

Flooding System
A suitable and reliable flooding system for the jacket legs or buoyancy chamber
for controlled flooding of the jacket during upending and placing on bottom shall
be designed.
Controlled flooding of the main legs or buoyancy chambers shall be done from
the top by providing a flood valve and a vent.
An auxiliary flooding/dewatering arrangement shall be provided at the bottom of
the jacket legs above mud-line which shall be protected from damage by a
protective housing.
Flexible closure diaphragms shall be provided at the bottom of jacket legs.

B.

Grouting System
Complete grouting of the Jacket leg/skirt sleeve annulus is an essential design
requirement. A reliable grouting system for grouting of the jacket leg/skirt
sleeves with the piles shall be provided. The primary grouting systems shall be
single stage grouting system with packers/grout seals. The system proposed
shall be of proven design.
Pressure grouting system shall be adopted as an alternate means of grouting in
case of failure of the planned system.
In case jacket leg extensions are provided in design, the grout inlet shall be
taken below mud line just above the packer and the grout line shall have a
protective casing up to mud line. Two additional diver operated grout ports at
appropriate elevations as back-up shall be provided.
Properly sized air supply lines shall extend from each of the grout seals to the
jacket top level. All inflatable packers shall be provided with a rupture disc

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 26 of 56

installed above the inflating connections to prevent premature inflation of the

packer by hydrostatic pressure in the event of inflation line getting damaged
during jacket installation.
Passive Grout Seals of proven design may be provided as an alternative to
inflatable grout packers. Two seals shall be provided at each location.
Suitable arrangement shall be provided for collection of return grout from the
annulus, in case the pressure grouting system is not utilized.
C.

Buoyancy Tanks
Buoyancy tanks, if required and their supports shall be designed to withstand
the effect of maximum hydrostatic pressures and slamming forces during dive
as per Cl. 3.4.3.1

D.

Skirt Pile guides

Skirt Pile guides shall be designed for the loads imposed during the installation
of the skirt piles. The guides shall be connected to the jacket main members by
doubler plate connection. As a minimum following criteria shall be considered
for the design of the skirt pile guide and the supporting framework.
Top Level:
a)1.5 times the weight of the lead pile section.
b)The total weight of all pile add-on sections supported at this level during
piling operation.
c) 0.25 times the weight of the lead section applied lateral to the plane of the
supporting frame.
Second Level:
The weight of the pile, which will initially pass this level.
Subsequent Level:
0.5 times the weight of the pile, which will initially pass these levels.
If skirt pile guides are also used to support buoyancy tanks, they shall also be
checked for adequacy to sustain loads experienced during jacket pre-service
conditions.

E.

Stab-in-Guides
All stab-in-guide shall be designed for the following loads as a minimum
Horizontal impact force
= 10% of static weight of the item
Vertical impact force
= 50% of static weight of the item

F.

Chaser Pile and Pile Connections

Chaser piles adequate for driving the skirt piles of the jacket shall be provided.
The dimensions of the chaser piles shall be determined based on the design
penetration of the skirt piles, drivability analysis, allowable stick-up lengths for
the hammers used and handling considerations.
Adequate pile connectors shall be used to assemble chaser pile segments and
ensure a sound connection of the chaser with the skirt pile.

G. Upending Padeyes
Upending padeyes shall be designed for the maximum sling load computed
during the upending operation. A lateral load of 5% of the static sling load shall
be applied in addition to the lateral load computed during the upending
operation. This load shall be applied at the edge of the outer cheek plate. A
load factor of 2.0 shall be considered for all the above loads.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 27 of 56

The orientation of the lower set of padeyes shall be fixed by taking into account
the variation of the angle of sling with rotation of the jacket during successive
stages of upending operation.
H. Conductor Guide Framing
The design of conductor guide framing shall also consider the loads imposed
during the installation of conductors. As a minimum, the following criteria shall
be considered for the design of conductor guide framing:
Top Level and Second Leve : - 1.5 times the weight of conductor which will
pass this level.
Subsequent Levels
: - 0.5 times the weight of conductor which will
pass this level.
3.4.3.6.3.7

Lifting Analysis of Deck

A list of major lifts envisaged is to be listed in Table-20 of Appendix-II. A lift study
shall be performed to establish that the modules as conceived are within lifting
capacity of the proposed barge crane. This study shall include adverse
combinations of variation in center of gravity and weight. The lifting scheme
including requirements of spreader frame shall be finalized based on this study. The
weight control report generated as per Cl. 3.4.3.8 shall form the basis of the study.
A three-dimensional space frame lift analysis shall be performed for all structures to
be lifted. Suitable positions and angles of the lift slings shall be considered.
Riggings shall be designed to limit the swing of lifted object to within 2 degrees
about any axis. Static equilibrium during the lifting operation shall be ensured by
addition of counter balancing loads, if necessary.
The lifting analysis shall be carried out for the following cases:
a) Analysis with all slings equally effective i.e. each diagonal pair of slings carrying
50% of the static lift weight.
b) Analysis with one diagonal pair of slings carrying 75% of the static lift weight
and the other diagonal pair of slings carrying 25% of the static lift weight.
c) Analysis shall be carried out considering the COG variation of 5% of
corresponding maximum linear dimension subject to minimum 1m on either
side.
Dynamic amplification factors to be considered for strength check of different
members and joints for the above analysis shall be as follows:
Case A. 2.0 for members framing into the lift points and contained within the lift
points including both end connections. Members directly joining lift
points shall be considered over full length under this category unless a
truss action reduces actual load over the length.
1.35 for all other members and joints including those connected to lifting
points but on the cantilever side.
Case B. 1.35 for all members.
If the subsequent weight control reports / actual weighing of the module indicate a
weight increase of more than 5% and / or a shift in center of gravity of more than 1m
or 5% of the maximum corresponding linear dimension, whichever is more; a
revised lift analysis shall be carried out to ensure that the permissible stress are not
exceeded due to the revised weight / center of gravity. The analysis shall also be
repeated if the framing arrangement of lifting scheme, spreader frame arrangement
or components to be lifted are revised to an extent to affect the stress distribution in
the structure.
Deflections shall be limited for structures with deflection sensitive appurtenances
(e.g. quarters buildings) or coating (e.g. fireproofing) to prevent damage.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

3.4.3.6.3.8

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 28 of 56

Design of Installation Aids for Superstructure

The minimum requirements for different installation aids for the superstructure are
given in this section. Installation aids shall be designed to suit the method of
installation for the anticipated function and loads. Applicable requirements of APIRP 2A shall be followed.
a) Lifting Eyes/Trunnions
Lifting eyes/Trunnions shall be designed for maximum sling load obtained at
each lifting points. Lifting eyes shall be designed as per requirements of API-RP
2A. The design sling load shall be computed based on an assumed tilt of 2 in
the most adverse direction.
The lifting eyes/trunnions design shall include sufficient reserve strength to allow
for future weight growth, load distribution changes and final selection of rigging.
b) Spreader Frames
Spreader frames shall be provided over modules whose top level containing
padeyes contains equipment and accessories which provide an obstruction to the
direct padeye-sling connection where found necessary by the designer or
installation contractor. If rigid legs are provided, they shall be adequately braced
to carry sway forces. The lifting analysis of the module with spreader frames with
rigid legs and sway braces shall be carried out as per Cl. 3.4.3.6.3.7 above and
including a side sway force of 5 percent of the vertical force in the 4 grid
directions.
The dynamic load factors for all members of the spreader frame, rigid legs and
sway braces if any, shall be 2.0 for load Case A and 1.35 for Case B of Cl.
3.4.3.6.3.7.
c) Bumper Guides
Bumper guides shall be provided on superstructure to arrest the sway of the
module being installed over it and to position the module accurately. The guide
system configuration and design shall be such that the guide system elements
fail prior to any damage to the module or the support structure, and the
connections to the support shall be stronger than the guide elements.
The guide system shall be designed for a normal load of 10 percent of the module
weight in the direction of guide support and a friction force of 3 percent of the
module weight in the lateral direction acting simultaneously. Basic AISC permissible
stresses shall be used in the design. No increase of allowable stresses shall be
permitted in design.

3.4.3.7
3.4.3.7.1

MISCELLANEOUS DESIGN
Helideck Component Design
a)
All functional requirements, including lighting, fire protection system,
markings on helideck, protective perimeter fencing, deck drainage system
etc. shall be in accordance with API-RP 2L and ICAO guidelines, unless
specified otherwise in the respective discipline specifications.
b)
Design live loads for helideck beams, solar panel platform and fire fighting
platform shall be as given in Table-11&12 of Appendix-II.
c)
Helideck safety net shall slope upwards at 10 degrees with the outer edge
level with the flight deck surface.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

3.4.3.7.2

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 29 of 56

Bridge Design
The requirements for design of the bridge for in-service conditions are given in this
section. The check for pre-service condition shall be same as for superstructure.
a)

Loading
The bridges between platforms shall be designed to withstand the appropriate
operating loads including piping, monorail, cable and cable trays, live loads and
contingencies as per Table-11 of Appendix-II, in combination with wind loads.
The bridges shall be designed to be installed using suitable pick-up sling
arrangement. The bridges may have monorail for transfer of material from one
platform to the other and have covering at roof and sides if shown on the
drawings.
The loading combination to be considered for the design of bridges shall be as
follows:
a) Dead load of bridge + dead weight of piping, cable, cable trays + piping
operating contents weight + extreme storm wind bridge frictional load.
b) Dead load of bridge + dead weight of piping, cable, cable trays + piping
operating contents weight + walkways live load + monorail live load +
operating wind load bridge frictional load.
c) Dead load of bridge + dead load of piping, cable, cable trays.
d) Dead load of bridge + dead load of piping, cable, cable trays + hydro test
load of any one of the large diameter pipes at a time.
Note: The following additional requirements apply to the design criteria for
bridges and the determination of bridge loads for jacket and deck design:
a) For in-place (Operating and extreme) conditions the piping operating
loads computed on the basis of presently planned piping (including any
planned future piping) shall be increased by 20 percent to cater to the
possible future needs.
b) The AFC drawing of bridge landing for both ends of each bridge shall
contain a note giving the maximum bridge reaction for which the bridge
landing has been designed.

b) Support Conditions
The bridge shall be designed to accommodate transverse and longitudinal
differential platform movement between the two platforms supporting it.
Predicted maximum relative deflection shall be calculated based on a worst
case situation, i.e. the sum of the maximum absolute deflections of the
adjacent platforms. But in no case the sum of the maximum absolute deflection
should be less than 300 mm. One end of the bridge shall be designed as a
hinged support and the other end as a sliding support. The sliding support shall
provide guide restraints in the vertical and lateral directions. The sliding support
shall be a self-lubricating bearing element in the form of SS-316L plates.
150% of the total predicted translation shall be allowed for in the end
connection and bridge design. The hinged connection shall be designed to
withstand 150% of the expected axial thrust.
Bridge supports shall be capable of accommodating a 1.0 m tolerance in all
directions for final platform location.
c)

Deflection
The maximum deflection of the bridge due to sum of bridge operating & live
load shall be limited to L/300, Where L is the average distance between bridge
support points.
The bridge shall be designed to be fabricated with a built-in camber based on
operating vertical load excluding live load and piping content weight so that it
will remain level after installation.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 30 of 56

3.4.3.7.3

Miscellaneous Accessories
1)
Structural support scheme for the survival crafts shall be designed to suit the
selected equipment, with due consideration given to minimize vibrations
during operation.
2)
Two identification boards, with name of the platform shall be provided on
North and South faces of the platforms respectively. For details refer
Appendix III.
3)
Firewalls, Fire Ceilings, partition walls and enclosures shall be provided on the
platform at locations as specified in Table-19 of Appendix-II.

3.4.3.8

WEIGHT CONTROL REPORT

A detailed weight inventory of all equipment, bulk materials and consumable to be
installed on the platform shall be maintained in the form of a Weight Control Report.
This report shall be computer generated in which various deck components
constituting the platform top sides are identified under separate heads and the
weight assessment of each unit shall be made for the following conditions:
a) In-place mode (for dry, operating and test conditions)
b) Load out
c) Transportation mode
d) Offshore lifting and installation
This Report shall be prepared separately for all the modules, which are identified to
be lifted separately at offshore.
For each of these items weight information shall be generally formatted as follows:
- Structural steel work
- Architectural and finish material including coating and insulation
- Each equipment using actual tag number for identification
- Piping, valves and supports (identified by name and/or tag number)
- HVAC System
- Duct work
- Electrical cabling including cable trays, supports, etc.
- Instrumentation cabling including cable trays, supports, air lines, hydraulic
lines, valves etc.
- Consumables
- Appropriate contingencies at various stages
Initial input of data shall consist of weights in which a high degree of confidence can
be placed and which are backed with data taken from Vendors, latest available
MTOs etc.
All weight and weight changes shall be monthly monitored throughout the design
period. The quality of input data shall be progressively refined and ultimately result
in the following:
- Data taken from equipment and valve certificates
- Final piping isometrics and MTOs
- Final structural MTOs based on fabrication drawings
- Final MTO for electrical and instrument items based on actual data sheets

3.4.3.8.1

Weight Monitoring and Control

The weight control report shall incorporate appropriate contingencies based on the
reliability/accuracy of the source of weight information. These contingencies shall be
added in a statistical manner to obtain the best estimate of the component weight.
The load contingencies stated in Appendix-II shall be applied to the weights arrived
at in the weight control report and shall be used in the pre-service and in-service
design of the various components.
As engineering/procurement work progresses, subsequent weight control reports
provide updated weight information which shall be used to estimate the margin on
weight available at that stage. This margin shall not be less than 5% till the time of
weighing of the modules. In case the weight growth is significant in the early

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 31 of 56

stages, weight reduction measures as appropriate or redesign shall be taken up and

submitted to Company for approval.
3.4.3.8.2

Weighing of Decks and ModulesPlatform Decks Equipment Modules shall be accurately weighed, prior to load-out.
Detailed weighting procedures shall be developed.
The weighing activity shall include, but not be limited, to the following:
a)
Weighing of module as per approved procedure
b)
Prepare schedule of items both permanent and temporary on the module
at the time of weighing including weights and location
c)
Reconcile weighing results with the weight control report.
d)
Prepare a detail weight schedule of all items, which are yet to be installed,
prior to lifting together with any item which are to be removed i.e. rigging
platforms etc.
e)
Prepare a final weighing report for every lift containing :
i)
Weighing Results
ii)
Reconciliation with weight control report (as per c) above.
iii)
Item schedule for (d) above

3.4.3.9

FINAL DOCUMENTATION
All analyses of deck shall be re-performed and documented if weight growth
observed after weighing is more than 5% and/or COG shift is more than 5% of
corresponding maximum linear dimension or 1m whichever is more.
All pre-service analyses of jacket shall be re-performed if weight growth is more
than 5% and/or COG shift is more than 1% of corresponding maximum linear
dimension or 1m whichever is more.
The final inplace and seismic analyses of jacket shall be re-performed and
documented in case deck analyses are required to be re-performed based on the
above criteria.
AFC drawings shall be reviewed accordingly if required and all changes
incorporated in the yard before load-out.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 32 of 56

APPENDIX I TO III

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 33 of 56

APPENDIX I
CODES AND STANDARDS
A. CODES
American Institute of Steel Construction (AISC)
Manual of Steel Construction
American National Standards Institute (ANSI)
A58.1 Building code Requirements for Minimum Design Loads in Building and Other Structures
American Petroleum Institute (API)
RP 2A-WSD Recommended Practice for Planning, Design and Constructing Fixed Offshore
Platforms - Working Stress Design
RP 2L
Recommended Practice for Planning, Designing and Constructing Heliports for
Fixed Offshore Platforms
SPEC 2B
Specification for Fabricated Structural Steel Pipes
SPEC 2C
Specification for Offshore Cranes
SPEC 2H
Specification for Carbon Manganese Steel Plate for Offshore Platform Tubular
Joints
SPEC 2W
Specification for Steel Plates for Offshore Structures, Produced by Thermo
Mechanical Control Processing (TMCP)
SPEC 2X
Recommended Practice for Ultrasonic Examination of Offshore Structural
Fabrication and Guidelines for Qualification of Ultrasonic Technicians
SPEC 5L
Specification for Line Pipes
SPEC 10 A Specification for Cement
American Society for Testing and Materials (ASTM)
A6
Specification for General Requirements for Rolled Steel Plates, Shapes, Sheet Piping
and Bars for Structural Use
A36
Specification for Structural Steel
A53
Specification for Pipe, Steel, Black and Hot-Dipped, Zinc-Coated Welded and Seamless
A106
Specification for Seamless Carbon Steel Pipe for High Temperature Service
A123
Specification for Zinc (Hot-Dip Galvanized) Coatings on Iron and Steel Products
A153
Specification for Zinc Coating (Hot-Dip) on Iron and Steel Hardware
A193
Specification for Alloy-Steel and Stainless Steel Bolting Materials for High Temperature
Service
A194
Specification for Carbon and Alloy Steel Nuts for Bolts for High Pressure and High
Temperature Service
A325
Specification for High Strength Structural Bolts for structural steel joints, Steel, Heat
Treated, 120 /105 Ksi Minimum Tensile Strength
A572
Specification for High-Strength Low-Alloy Columbium - Vanadium Steels of Structural
Quality
A578
Specification for straight - Beam Ultrasonic Examination of Plain and Clad Steel Plates
for Special Applications
D2000
Specification system for Rubber Products in Automotive Applications
American Welding Society (AWS)
D1.1
Structural Welding Code-Steel
Bureau of Indian Standards (BIS)
IS 1893 Criteria for Earthquake Resistant Design of Structures
IS 883
Code of Practice for Design of structural Timber for Buildings
IS 2062 Steel for General Structural Purposes
Civil Aviation Authority Guidelines (CAA)
Helideck Design Considerations Environmental Effects
Civil Aviation Authority Guidelines- CAP437 (CAA)
Offshore Helicopter Landing Areas- Guidance on Standards
International Standards and Recommended Practices (ICAO)
Aerodromes, Annex -14, Volume II, Heliports
National Association of Corrosion Engineers (NACE)
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

RP-01-76

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 34 of 56

Recommended Practice for Corrosion Control of Steel, Fixed Offshore Platforms

Associated with Petroleum Production

SOLAS
Regulations of the International convention for the safety of life at Sea
United States Department of Labour - Occupational Safety and Health Administration
(OSHA)
29 CFR 1910 General Industry OSHA Safety and Health Standards
OSHA 3124
Stairways and Ladders, Occupational Health and safety administration-US
department of Labor 1997 (revised)
B. STANDARDS
i) 7-60-0801 Rev 1 - Handrails for Offshore Platforms
ii) 7-60-0802 Rev 1 - Standard Grating Details
iii) 7-60-0803 Rev 1 - Stairs for Offshore Platforms
iv) 7-60-0804 Rev 0 - General Notes for Jacket
v) 7-60-0805 Rev 0 - General Notes for Deck
vi) 7-60-0806 Rev 0 - Jacket welding Details
vii) 7-60-0807 Rev 0 - Deck welding Details
viii) 7-60-0809 Rev 0 - Standard Details of Rub-strips
ix) 7-60-0811 Rev 0 - Standard Details of Escape Ladder

APPENDIX-I A
LIST OF SPECIFICATIONS
SL.No.

Specification No.

Description

1.

6-60-0011Rev 0

Specification for Materials

(Offshore Structures/ Components)

2.

6-60-0012Rev 0

Specification for Load Out, Transportation

& Installation of Offshore Platforms

3.

6-60-0013 Rev 0

Specification for Fabrication and Assembly

of Offshore Structures/ Components

4.

6-60-0014 Rev 0

Specification for Equipment Packages, Living

Quarters and Buildings

5.

6-60-0015 Rev 0

Specification for Skid Mounted Assemblies

Other Specifications
1.

6423-00-06-42-SP-01

Specification for Protective Coating

2.

6423-00-06-41-SP-04

Welding and Weld Inspection

3.

6423-00-06-42-CP-01

Cathodic Protection System Offshore Platform

4.

6423-00-16-56-SP-03

Specification for Site Condition

5.

6423-00-16-56-SP-013

Specification for Pre-Engineering, Pre-Construction

and As-Built Surveys.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Page 35 of 56

APPENDIX - II
PROJECT SPECIFIC DATA
Table-1:

Load Contingency

Sl.
No.

Item

Contingency Percentage

a.

Substructure Dead Weight

b.

Superstructure Dead Weight

10

c.

Building Architectural items

20

d.

Equipment and Piping Dead Weight

20

e.

Equipment and Piping Operating Weight

20

Note:
1. Load contingencies are in addition to the mill tolerance and weld metal specified in Cl.
3.4.2.8.
2. Reductions to the amount of contingency to reflect the relative confidence level in the
weight data shall be subject to the approval of Company.
3. Contingency for modular rig load shall be 10%.
Table-2:

Platform Life
Design service life of the platform

Table-3:

30 Years

Platform Location and Water Depth

Chart Datum: It shall be considered as 0.10 m above LAT.

Platform
Name
DDW1
Table-4:

Northing

Easting

Ref. Point

Bearing of
Platform
North Wrt
True North

1843520.14M

652350.64M

KG#8 WELL

318.6

Location as per Spheroid-1830 and UTM 69 CM

Water
Depth (m)
Wrt C.D.
57.0

Marine Growth Profile and Corrosion Zones

From Elevation
(m)

To Elevation (m)

Marine Growth
Thickness (cm)

(+) 3.0

(-) 30.0

10.0

(-) 30.0

MUDLINE

5.0

Submerged Zone

(-) 3.5

MUDLINE

Splash Zone

(-) 3.5

(+) 6.0

Atmospheric Zone

(+) 6.0

UPWARDS

Item
Marine Growth Profile

Table-5:

Wave Kinematics and Current Blockage Factors

(for Extreme Storm and Operating Storm Conditions)

1. Wave Kinematics Factor = 0.880

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Page 36 of 56

2. Current Blockage actor as follows:Platform Name

DDW1

No. of Legs

Current Heading Direction

End-On

Diagonal

Broad Side

0.75

0.85

0.80

Table-6:
Extreme Storm Parameters
Lowest Astronomical Tide (LAT) = -0.1 meters.
Approach
Direction
(From-To)

Tide (M)

Max. Wave

AT

Storm

N-S
NE-SW
E-W
SE-NW
S-N
SW-NE
W-E
NW-SE

1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8

0.0
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.9
0.7
0.0
0.0

Height
(M)
9.1
20.1
20.1
19.8
19.2
17.2
4.5
3.3

Period
(Sec)
9.8
14.0
14.0
13.9
13.7
13.0
7.1
6.3

Current (M/Sec)
Bottom
0.98
1.00
0.77
0.75
0.92
0.95
0.77
0.75

Y1/4
1.53
1.55
1.09
1.07
1.41
1.44
1.15
1.13

Y-1/2

Y3/4
2.63
2.66
1.72
1.70
2.39
2.42
1.90
1.88

2.08
2.11
1.40
1.38
1.90
1.93
1.52
1.50

Surface
3.18
3.21
2.03
2.01
2.88
2.91
2.26
2.24

Wind
(Km/h)
1-Hour
Average
212.4
212.4
212.4
212.4
212.4
212.4
212.4
212.4

Table-7: Operating Storm ParametersApproach

Direction
(From-To)

Tide (M)

Max. Wave

AT

Storm

N-S
NE-SW
E-W
SE-NW
S-N
SW-NE
W-E
NW-SE

1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8
1.8

0.0
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.2
0.0
0.0

Height
(M)
3.8
8.3
8.3
8.1
9.8
8.9
1.9
1.4

Table-8:

Period
(Sec)
6.6
10.0
10.0
9.9
10.4
10.1
5.4
4.9

Current (M/Sec)
Bottom
0.77
0.80
0.67
0.65
0.77
0.8
0.67
0.65

Y1/4
1.05
1.08
0.77
0.74
1.08
1.1
0.81
0.79

Y-1/2

Y3/4
1.59
1.62
0.95
0.93
1.68
1.71
1.08
1.07

1.32
1.34
0.85
0.84
1.38
1.41
0.94
0.93

Surface
1.86
1.89
1.04
1.02
1.98
2.01
1.22
1.20

Wind
(Km/h)
1-Hour
Average
61.2
61.2
61.2
61.2
72.0
72.0
61.2
61.2

Environmental Parameters for Installation Conditions

Current (m/sec)

Direction

Tide (m)

Wave Height (m)

Period (sec)

All
Directions

1.8

3.53

7.20

Wind (m/sec)

Surface

Bottom

1 Minute Sustained

1.24

0.64

14.9

Notes:
1. Wave kinematics factor equal to 1.0 and current blockage factor equal to 1.0 shall be applied
in all directions for the installation conditions.
2. All members shall be considered as smooth.
3. The above environmental parameters assume Installation of Jacket in the months of January
or February.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Table-9:

Environmental Parameters for Fatigue Analysis

Wave Height
(m)
0-0.4
0.5-0.9
1.0-1.4
1.5-1.9
2.0-2.4
2.5-2.9
3.0-3.4
3.5-3.9
4.0-4.4
4.5-4.9
5.0-5.4
5.5-5.9
6.0-6.9
7.0-7.9
8.0-8.9
9.0-9.9
10.0-10.9
11.0-11.9
12.0-12.9
13.0-13.9
14.0-14.9
15.0-15.9
16.0-16.9

N
4.7
5.2
5.6
5.9
6.3
6.6
6.9
7.2
7.5
7.8
8.1
8.4
8.7
9.0
-

NE
5.0
5.4
5.8
6.2
6.6
7.0
7.4
7.8
8.2
8.6
9.0
9.4
9.7
10.0
10.3
10.6
10.9
11.2
11.5
11.8
12.1
12.4
12.7

E
5.0
5.4
5.8
6.2
6.6
7.0
7.4
7.8
8.2
8.6
9.0
9.4
9.7
10.0
10.3
10.6
10.9
11.2
11.5
11.8
12.1
12.4
12.7

Table-10:
Wave
Height
(m)
0
0.4
0.9
1.4
1.9
2.4
2.9
3.4
3.9
4.4
4.9
5.4
5.9
6.9
7.9
8.9
9.9
10.9
11.9
12.9
13.9
14.9
15.9

Page 37 of 56

Period (sec)
Wave Direction (from)
SE
S
5.0
5.1
5.4
5.5
5.8
5.9
6.2
6.3
6.6
6.7
7.0
7.1
7.4
7.5
7.8
7.8
8.2
8.2
8.6
8.6
9.0
9.0
9.4
9.4
9.7
9.7
10.0
10.0
10.3
10.3
10.6
10.6
10.9
10.9
11.2
11.2
11.5
11.5
11.8
11.8
12.1
12.1
12.4
12.4
12.6
-

SW
5.0
5.4
5.9
6.3
6.7
7.1
7.5
7.8
8.2
8.6
9.0
9.4
9.7
10.0
10.3
10.6
10.9
11.2
11.5
11.8
12.0
-

W
4.4
4.8
5.1
5.4
5.7
6.0
6.3
6.5
-

NW
4.1
4.5
4.9
5.2
5.5
5.8
-

Wave Exceedance Data (25 Years)

Wave Direction (from)

NE

SE

SW

NW

2175947
1159782
577997
289075
145903
73910
38249
19811
10242
5348
2825
1512
820
133
-

32494148
17319409
8631416
4316846
2178817
1103721
571184
295851
152950
79861
42189
22577
12250
3796
1248
428
153
56
20
9
5
3
1

17262516
9200936
4585439
2293325
1157496
586352
303441
157171
81255
42426
22413
11994
6508
2017
663
228
81
30
17
9
5
2
1

12475432
6649416
3313847
1657361
836510
423750
219294
113586
58722
30661
16197
8667
4703
1458
479
164
59
22
10
6
4
2
1

40907812
21803900
10866335
5434601
2742975
1389505
719080
372454
192552
100539
53113
28423
15424
4779
1570
540
194
71
23
8
4
2
-

34379969
18324553
9132346
4567378
2305266
1167776
604333
313021
161826
84496
44637
23887
12961
4017
1320
453
162
60
21
6
2
-

4206832
2242245
1117460
558877
282079
142892
28960
546
-

1160505
618550
308265
154173
31367
607
-

Notes:
1. Wave directions are directions from which wave approaches the platform.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Table-11:
I.
Sl.
No
1.

3.

Page 38 of 56

Live Loads

Uniformly Distributed Area Live Loads (Blanket Loads)

Item/Location

Uniformly Distributed
Area Live Loads
(Blanket Load)

Plated Area
i) Main Deck
ii) Cellar Deck

2.

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

Module areas where

module skid are
supported directly
onto the deck main
trusses/ framework
Potable Water
Storage tank area

4.

Access hatches

5.

Building Module
Floors
a) T.G. Room

b) HVAC Area, Utility

Generator Room.
c) Open areas on roof
AHU rooms, Store
rooms, wireless
shop, mechanical
shop, Valve Repair
shop, Waste Heat
recovery system
area, Laundry, hot
oil tank area
d) Electrical shop,
Instrument shop,
Oil & Gas
Laboratory, Battery
rooms, Transformer
rooms, Bridge
landing area
e) Switchgear room,
T.G. control room,
Computer and
communication
room, RTU room,
Telemetry room,
Toilet, Tea room,
Bunk House
f) Living rooms, Office
areas, Corridors.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

1500 kg/m2
2000 kg/m2

Remarks
All beams should be checked for the
case of (actual equipment and piping
dead weight + operating contents
weight + live load of 500 kg/m2 on
open area) and reinforced if required.

Actual Loading

Actual Loading
2000 kg/m2

Access hatches shall be checked for

appropriate concentrated load also.

Actual

TG Module floor beams shall be

designed for a blanket load of
1500Kg/m2.

1500kg/m2

1000kg/m2

675 kg/m2

500 kg/m2

500 kg/m2
Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

6.

g) Live load on each

floor and accessible
roof (in combination
with equipment and
piping operating
loads)
Process/ Equipment
Modules

8.
9.
10.

11.
12.

13.

II.

All loading/unloading
areas Platform
i) Main Deck
ii) Cellar Deck
All grated areas
Open deck area live
load
Helideck beam
(local design only)

Helideck fire fighting &

solar panel platform
Helideck Uniformly
Distributed area live
load
Bridge walkway live
load

1500 kg/m2
2000 kg/m2
500 kg/m2

Process/equipment floor beams &

plating shall be sized for a minimum
blanket loading of 1500 kg/m2 at
Main Deck and 2000 kg/m2 at Cellar
Deck.
DAF of 1.35 to be used during local
design to check for maximum weight
of lifting/dropping object

500 kg/m2
Static helicopter load Critical position of the Helicopter shall
plus uniform live load of be evaluated in the analysis.
200 kg/m2OR Helicopter
landing load
200 kg/m2
200 kg/m2

For Global Design only

150 kg/m2

For Global Design only

Grating Design (for Global and Local)

Live Load =

III.

Page 39 of 56

125 kg/m2

Actuals

7.

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

500 kg/m2

Reactions from Building/Process/Equipment/Living Quarter Modules for Global InService Analysis

Sl. No.

Item

1.

Building Module of Well Platforms

a). For deck in-place analysis
b).For jacket & pile in-place conditions

Load to be Considered for

Calculating Reactions
375 kg/m2 on plan area of each floor
and accessible roof
300 kg/m2 on plan area of each floor
and accessible roof

Notes:
1. Open deck area is defined as area outside 0.5m from any equipment/skid/building module
foot print area. Global live load (blanket load or uniformly distributed area live loads) is
defined as loads on all deck plated/grated areas of platform.
2. The term Equipment and piping dead weight includes dead loads of equipment, piping
including pipe supports, electrical cables, cables & cables trays, instruments & instrument
trays.
3. Helicopter data shall be as given in Table-12 of Appendix-II.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

4.
5.
6.
7.

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 40 of 56

For Global design appropriate percentages of the live load figures given in Table-11 of
Appendix-II shall be used as specified in the respective load combination tables.
No live load is to be considered on walkways, landing, stairways, loading/unloading areas
and bridge walkways of the modules for calculating the reactions from building/LQ module.
No live load shall be considered on grated area of jacket, boat landing and intermediate
landing for global analysis.
For initial design of Jacket uplift case, in absence of actual Dead Load of equipment and
piping, 20% of blanket live load, as applicable may be assumed.

Table-12:

Static Helicopter Data

Bell
212

Detail

Bell
412

Westland
Wg 30

Sikorsky 576 A
Type I

Type II

Dauphin2
Sa 365 N

Mi 8

Sikorsky
S-61-N

Gross WT (MT)

5.08

5.26

5.80

4.67

4.67

3.85

12.50

8.297

Main Rotor Dia (mm)

14.7

14.2

13.31

13.31

13.40

11.91

21.3

18.9

Overall Length (m)

17.5

17.12

15.91

16.0

16.0

13.46

25.4

22.1

Landing Gear type

SKID

SKID

WHEEL

WHEEL

WHEEL

WHEEL

WHEEL

WHEEL

No of Gears
-Nose
-Rear

2
2

2
2

1
2

1
2

1
2

1
2

1
2

2
1

1
1

1
1

1
1

1
1

2
1

2
1

275

330

Distance between nose &

rear gear (m)

2.3

2.322

5.45

5.0

5.0

3.61

4.26

7.2

Transverse Spacing (m)

2.7

2.178

3.1

2.44

2.44

1.9

4.5

4.3

40
34

10
40

20
40

25
37.5

25
37.5

NA
NA

41.67
28.17

43
15

55
55

140
160

120
135

79.75
123.25

64
78

75
70

No of Wheels Gear
-Nose
-Rear
Spacing of Wheels (mm)
-Nose

% of gross wt Per Gear

-Nose
-Rear
Tyre Pressure (Psi)
-Nose
-Rear

Note:
1. Well head platforms shall be designed for all helicopters except MI-8 & Sikorsky S-61-N
Table-13:
Platform

Geotechnical Data
Pile
Name

Applicable Bore
Hole

DDW1
---

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

KG-8

Applicable Soil Report

Remarks

Final Report on Geotechnical

Investigation at KG-OSN2001/3 Exploration Block;
Location KG-08 (platform).
Doc. No.CM 0801030002F
(Rev 2)

---

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Table - 14:
Sl. No.
1

Table - 15:

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 41 of 56

Jack-up Rig Penetration

Estimated Jack-Up Leg Penetration Below Mudline
(m)
30 m

Platform Name
DDW1

Material for Mudmat

Material for mudmat shall be steel.

Table-16:

Pile Driving Hammers

Sl. No.

Hammer Design

No of Hammer

Notes:
1.
2.

3.

The minimum achievable efficiency of the hammer shall not be less than 75%
For approved equivalence, the following factors, besides others, shall be satisfied as a
minimum:
a)
Energy equivalence to above mentioned hammers.
b)
Driving capability, that is the capacity of the hammer to overcome soil resistance, shall
be the same as for the above-mentioned hammers.
c)
The stresses on the pile during driving shall be within 90% of the yield stress of pile
material.
The above list of hammers is indicative. Type of hammers to be mobilized shall be as per the
requirement of driving of piles and conductors to be firmed up as a part of installation
engineering.

Table-17:

Parameters for Pile Drivability Analysis

I.

Dynamic Soil Parameters

Damping Coefficient (sec/m)
Soil Type
Side
Point
Clay
0.656
0.033
Sand
0.164
0.492

Quake (mm)
Side
2.54
2.54

Point
2.54
2.54

Notes:
1. For layered soil, weighted average of side damping value shall be used.

II.

Soil Resistance to Driving (SRD)

Skin Friction
Platform
Soil Type
W.R.T Static
Name
Capacity
Clay
50%
DDW1
Sand
100%

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

End Bearing
W.R.T Static
Capacity
0%
100%

Remarks

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Table-18:
Sl. No.
1.
2.
3.
4.
5.
6.
7.
8.
9.

Area and Location

A.
A.1
A.2
A.3
A.4

A.9
A.10
A.11

BUILDING MODULE (Switchgear & TG)

Wall facing compressor area of the building
Other exterior walls of the module
Module level-1 floor
Walls and roof of transformer
Common wall between transformer and switchgear
room
Utility Generator walls & roof
Wall between HVAC and toilet and adjoining room
Wall between T.G. room/T.G. Control room/other
rooms
Walls and ceiling of corridor
All walls, ceiling & flooring of battery room
Roof of SG room

A.12

Crane pedestal at Level-1

B.

OTHER AREAS
Flooring under Compressor Modules and all field
installed plated areas on main deck between
modules

A.6
A.7
A.8

B.1
B.2

Fire Ratings

Sl. No.

A.5

Page 42 of 56

Information to be furnished by contractor

Information to be Furnished
Hammer Designation
Numbers of hammers
Rated Energy (kN-m)
Ram Weight (kN)
Pile Cap Weight(kN)
Efficiency Range (%)
Cushion Material
Cushion Spring Material (kN/m)
Coefficient of Restitution

Table-19:

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

Barrier (Fire) Wall on Cellar Deck of well platform.

Fire
Rating

Source of Fire

H-120
A-60
H-60
H-60

Outside
Outside
Below
Transformer

H-60

Transformer

A-60
A-60

A-60
A-60
A-60

Outside
Outside
Turbine
Generator
Outside
Outside
Outside

H-60

H-60

Below

H-60

Hydrocarbon
side

A-60

C.
BUILDING MODULE (LIVING QUARTER)
C1.
East side wall of building module
A-60
Outside
C2.
Other exterior wall of building module
A-60
Outside
C3.
Module level-1 floor.
H-60
Below
C4.
Internal stair wall.
A-60
Outside
C5.
Wall between AHU/HVAC and living room
A-60
Outside
C6.
Corridor wall & ceiling
A-60
Outside
C7.
Wall around Electric Chase & Electric Room
A-60
Inside
C8.
Wall, roof, and floor of Radio Room
A-60
Outside
Notes:
1. Fire ratings for all doors, windows, automatic louvers and shutters shall have fire rating as
specified for the walls in which they are located.
2. Certificates for fire rating of actual cross sections to be used shall be furnished.
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

3.
4.

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 43 of 56

The rating requirements are furnished on a conceptual basis. Where conflicting

requirements are stated for the same wall, the higher rating requirements shall apply.
All H-rated assemblies shall contain a fire proofing material applied on the fireside. The fire
proofing material so applied shall have acceptable past track record of offshore use. The
procedure for application shall be strictly as per vendors recommended procedures and
under the supervision of Vendors authorized Representative. Acceptable fire proofing
materials shall be as per specification attached in bid. The surface of the fireproofing shall
be coated with a topcoat of paint of the same colour as the building module.

Table-20:

List of major Lifts as envisaged by the bidder

Information to be furnished by the bidder in their bid

Sl. No.

Item to be Lifted

Table-21:
Sl
No.

Structure

Table-22:

Table-23:
Sl. No.
a)
b)
c)
Note:

Transportation Barge Data

Barge

LOA
(m)

Breadth
(m)

Moulded
Depth (m)

Route of Tow

Remarks

Geometrical Constraints
Air Gap = 1.5m
Still Water Level = CD + LAT + 75% of Astronomical Tide + Storm Surge
Corrosion Allowance
Location/Item
Jacket legs
Jacket bracing members, Casing and Sump Cassions
Barge bumper post and Boat Landing members

Additional Thickness (mm)

12
12
6

This corrosion allowance shall be removed from the exterior surface for calculation of
member stresses and joint stresses in the in-service analysis.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 44 of 56

APPENDIX-III
PROJECT SPECIFIC REQUIREMENTS
In addition to all other requirement of the bid package, following specific requirements shall be met by
the bidder.
1.0 GEOMETRIC CONSTRAINTS
Drilling and work over shall be done with Jack-Up rig Atwood Beacon (or equivalent). The
layout of the platform and Jack-up rig is as shown in drawing number 6423-000-16-56-1002.
Drilling shall be done after installation of the structure and topsides. Following geometrical
constrains shall be incorporated in the platform design from jackup rig operational point of
view.
x Minimum clear distance of edge of Jack-up rig from structure 4.59 M.
x Maximum outreach capability of Jack-up rig from edge of rig 21.33 M.
x Minimum unobstructed clear distance on main deck beyond innermost row of wells 9.5 M
x Jack up rig shall approach the platform from south. Platform shall be designed with a
vertical face at the south side to facilitate approach, positioning and docking of rig without
any hindrances.
x Main Deck elevation
(+) 26.000 m (TOS)
x Highest elevation on the main Deck (+) 26.200 m
x Besides supporting the wells and topsides, the substructure shall serve as a well protector
structure to protect the wells/conductors from accidental vessel impact.
x Main Deck area falling between the jacket legs (Row 1 and Row 3) shall be kept free of
permanent equipments etc. to avoid fouling with placement of modular rig or CTU.
2.0 MODULAR RIG DATA
The platform shall be designed for a generic Modular Rig (Approximate operating weight
6700MT).
Loading data and layout are attached in Annexure II of Appendix III
3.0 RISER DETAILS
Please refer Section -1, Background & General, Section 2- Scope of work and Process
Design Criteria. Further the details are as indicated below.

Platform

Riser Size

DDW1

18

Present

Future

Location of riser
With respect to
Platform

North

Number of riser

4.0 MARINE GROWTH REMOVAL & PREVENTER SYSTEM

All the jacket legs, vertical framing brace members and conductors between the jacket walkway
level and the first horizontal level below jacket walkway level shall be fitted with ocean powered
marine growth removal and prevention system. However these members shall be designed with
full marine growth.
5.0 JACKET PILE CONNECTION
The annuli between pile and jacket legs/ skirt pile sleeves shall be grouted as per specifications.
6.0 EARTHQUAKE DESIGN PARAMETER
Zone = III
Importance factor = 2
Soil condition = soft (Type III)
Response spectrum = As per IS1893-2002 Part-I
Response reduction factor = 5
Damping = 5%
Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 45 of 56

For the earthquake analysis of equipment and service support, an equivalent static analysis
shall be carried out with a horizontal seismic coefficient of 0.12.
Note Deck and jacket should be analyzed for rare intense earthquake as per API RP 2A clause
no. 2.3.6.d (the intensity ratio of rare intense earthquake ground motions to strength level
earthquake ground motions shall be considered as 2.0).
7.0 CONDUCTOR LAYOUT
Platform shall be designed for all the 16 wells as mentioned at ANNEXURE III of this
APPENDIX. -III. Conductor guides shall be provided on Deck and Jacket horizontal framing,
considering conductor size as 30and with opening in Guide to allow 32 connector to pass.
8.0 IDENTIFICATION BOARDS WITH NAME OF PLATFORM
Two identification boards, with name of the platform shall be provided on North and South
faces of the platforms respectively. The details to be written on the boards shall be approved
by the company. The letters on the boards shall be at least 900 mm in size.
9.0 BRIDGES
The platform shall be designed for the bridge spanning between DDW1 and PLQP Platforms
as per following details:
Span
: 100meters (approximate, to be confirmed)
Cross Section : Refer Annexure I to Appendix III
Landing Location : as per bid drawings
Orientation
: as per bid drawings
The bridge loading shall be estimated based on the provision of the engineering design
criteria clause no: 3.4.3.7.2. Sliding end shall be provided on DDW1 platform.
10.0 DROP OBJECT DESIGN:
The equipment on deck area shall be protected from falling object by a protective roof at the
upper deck level. The Location and loading on such protection shall be established by the
contractor as per safety studies. However the protective structure shall be designed for an
equivalent static load of 1.5 MT/sq m as a minimum.
11.0 PROCESS EQUIPMENTS:
The platform shall be designed for loads due to process equipments such as Separator,
Coolers and Slug-Catchers located at Cellar Deck level. The loading data for these
equipments will be furnished later.
Truss configuration on Row-3 and F3 of super-structure shall facilitate installation of the above
equipments in future.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 46 of 56

Annexure I
to Appendix III

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 47 of 56

DDW1-PLQ Bridge Cross Section

(To be furnished later)

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 48 of 56

Annexure - II

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 49 of 56

MODULAR RIG LOAD DATA

1.0 The platform is to be designed for a generic modular rig (approx operating weight of 6700MT).
The modular rig is supported by a system of capping beams supported at discrete locations on
the main deck (Refer Fig 1).

R5

R6/R7

R8/R15

R16/R17

R18/R19

R1

R2/R3

R4/R9

R10/R11

R12/R13

FIG.-1 KEY PLAN SHOWING SUPPORT POINTS

OF CAPPING BEAM

R20

R14

GSPC
DEEN DAYAL FIELD
DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WELL HEAD PLATFORM

DDW1

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Page 50 of 56

M6

M7

M8

P3

P4

T3

T4

L3

L4

DES-B

M5

DES-A

DES-A

DES-B

2.0 The drilling package consists of two parts viz., Des A Substructure (in two parts) supported at
locations M1, M2, M5, M6 and M3,M4,M7,M8. The second part Des B (drill floor and mast) is
supported on Des A. (Refer Fig 2). The other modules are supported on skid beams as
shown.

P-TANKS

POWER MODULE

P1
SUPPORT M1

M2

M3

P2

T1

T2

LIVING QUARTERS

L1

L2

M4

GSPC

FIG.-2 MODULAR RIG ON WELL-P

DEEN DAYAL FIELD

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WELL HEAD PLATFORM

(POSITION ON WELL-A SHOWN DOTTED)

PLAN

DDW1

3.0 The break up of Loads is as follows:

COMPONENT
DES A
DES B
POWER MODULE
P-TANK MODULE
CRANE
LIVING QUARTERS
TOTAL

DRY(MT)
1004
700
558
140
175
770
3347

OPERATING (MT)
1790
1480
1610
785
175
891
6731

Note: - Hook Load of 589MT is included in the above operating weights.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

Page 51 of 56

4.0 The following tables give the load data in terms of Capping beam reactions.
Modular Rig Loading at 16 Well Positions (MT)
Dead Load +Live Load (Excluding Hook Load)
S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Load
Label
11A
11B
11C
11D
11E
11F
11G
11H
11I
11J
11K
11L
11M
11N
11O
11P

R1
1690.41
1499.80
1309.20
1118.60
1236.32
1096.66
956.99
817.33
741.01
650.79
560.56
411.37
360.57
309.77
183.71
159.65

Row A
R2
R3
-95.78
4.40
-100.01
4.40
-104.23
4.40
-108.45
4.40
280.53
62.73
255.40
40.20
230.28
17.67
205.16
-4.85
693.44
32.64
618.88
19.12
544.32
5.61
639.76
301.31
565.80
266.78
491.85
232.25
208.33
667.93
178.92
593.83

R4
5.95
5.95
5.95
5.95
25.39
17.89
10.38
2.87
40.47
23.95
7.43
155.13
119.59
84.05
350.18
282.92

R5
1418.48
1609.08
1799.68
1990.29
1038.58
1178.24
1317.90
1457.57
693.95
784.18
874.41
358.42
409.22
460.02
164.59
188.65

Row B
R6
R7
-299.90
4.40
-295.68
4.40
-291.46
4.40
-287.23
4.40
276.75 -143.17
301.88 -120.64
327.00
-98.11
352.13
-75.58
703.77
-77.38
778.33
-63.87
852.89
-50.35
723.61
213.91
797.56
248.44
871.52
282.98
184.96
856.11
214.37
930.20

R8
5.95
5.95
5.95
5.95
-43.24
-35.73
-28.22
-20.71
-94.00
-77.48
-60.96
-69.60
-34.06
1.48
118.10
185.35

Modular Rig Hook Loading (589MT) at 16 Well Positions (MT)

S.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8
9
10
11
12
13
14
15
16

Load
Label
12A
12B
12C
12D
12E
12F
12G
12H
12I
12J
12K
12L
12M
12N
12O
12P

Row A
R1

R2

414.53
305.06
195.59
86.12
294.36
216.62
138.89
61.15
155.72
108.34
60.96
86.18
59.96
33.74
34.62
22.19

73.15
53.83
34.52
15.20
88.80
65.35
41.90
18.45
176.84
123.04
69.23
125.46
87.29
49.12
42.31
27.13

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Row B
R3

78.40
57.69
36.99
16.29
40.83
28.40
15.98
104.30
72.56
40.83
121.74
78.06

R4

R5

R6

R7

R8

26.13
19.23
12.33
5.43
49.90
34.72
19.53
107.35
74.69
42.02
160.23
102.73

86.12
195.59
305.06
414.53
61.15
138.89
216.62
294.36
60.96
108.34
155.72
33.74
59.96
86.18
22.19
34.62

15.20
34.52
53.83
73.15
18.45
41.90
65.35
88.80
69.23
123.04
176.84
49.12
87.29
125.46
27.13
42.31

16.29
36.99
57.69
78.40
15.98
28.40
40.83
40.83
72.56
104.30
78.06
121.74

5.43
12.33
19.23
26.13
19.53
34.72
49.90
42.02
74.69
107.35
102.73
160.23

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 52 of 56

Living Quarters, P-tanks & Power Module (excluding crane operating loads) loading (MT)
Load
Label
LQDL
LQLL
P TANK
DL
P TANK
LL
POWER
DL
POWER
LL
CAPBM
LD

S.No

1
2
3
4
5
6
7

Row A
R11
R12
17.85 101.13
10.96
62.12

R9
-

R10
-

35.00

189.66

Row B
R17
R18
17.98 101.87
5.56
31.51

R13
-

R14
279.68
32.02

R15
-

R16
-

R19
-

R20
281.50
-21.17

35.00

35.00

35.00

161.25

161.25

161.25

161.25

63.22

231.19

57.80

58.61

19.53

90.38

22.60

139.60

46.50

261.28

65.32

147.69

49.23

273.9

68.48

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

4.50

Modular Crane Operating Loads (MT)

Sr.No
1
2
3
4
5
6
7
8

Load
Label
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE
PMC
ROPE

Row A

Row B

Angle

R9

R10

R11

R12

R13

R14

R15

R16

R17

R18

R19

R20

162.4

54.16

-103.03

-25.76

118.94

39.65

-149.46

-37.36

45

187.9

62.64

5.09

1.27

17.57

5.86

-176.61

-44.15

90

122.6

40.88

130.81

32.70

-100.28

-33.43

-106.97

-26.74

135

4.78

1.59

200.45

50.11

-165.58

-55.19

18.75

4.69

180

-96.59

-32.20

173.30

43.32

-140.12

-46.71

126.87

31.72

225

-122.0

-40.68

65.18

16.29

-38.75

-12.92

154.02

38.51

270

-56.75

-18.92

-60.53

-15.13

79.10

26.37

84.37

21.09

315

61.10

20.37

-130.18

-32.55

144.40

48.13

-41.34

-10.33

Note:
1) Positive values indicate Compression and Negative values indicate uplift.
2) Contractor shall follow the designated SACS load label for well positions/ module loads.
3) Contractor shall design the cap plates which support the capping beam (refer Fig. 1) for the
following load combinations:
a) Modular Rig Dead Load + Live Load (Excluding hook load) + Wind Load (Extreme).
b) Modular Rig Dead Load + Live Load (Including hook load).
Indicative Cap Plate details are included in the bid drawings. Contractor shall develop the
details during detail engineering.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 53 of 56

5.0 The following sketches (Fig. 3, 4 and 5) indicate the Wind Area obstruction to be used by
Contractor as Wind Area Cards pertaining to Modular Rig in the SACS analysis.

CRANE BOOM

DES-B

STORAGE
ROOM

LIVING QUARTERS

DES-A

POWER MODULE

P-TANKS

GSPC
FIG.-3 ELEVATION OF MODULAR RIG IN EAST/ WEST- DIRECTION

DEEN DAYAL FIELD

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WELL HEAD PLATFORM

DDW1

DES-B
WORK
SHOP

STORAGE
ROOM
LIVING QUARTERS
MODULE

GSPC
FIG.-4 ELEVATION OF MODULAR RIG IN NORTH- DIRECTION

DEEN DAYAL FIELD

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WELL HEAD PLATFORM

DDW1

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 54 of 56

DES-B

STORAGE
ROOM

WORK
SHOP

POWER
MODULE

DES-A

POWER
MODULE

GSPC
FIG.-5 ELEVATION OF MODULAR RIG IN SOUTH- DIRECTION

DEEN DAYAL FIELD

DEVELOPMENT PROJECT
WELL HEAD PLATFORM

DDW1

Note: The centroid of Wind Area for DES A & DES B package will change with well location.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 55 of 56

Annexure - III

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved

ENGINEERING DESIGN CRITERIA

(STRUCTURAL)
DEEN DAYAL FIELD DEVELOPMENT
PROJECT
WELLHEAD PLATFORM DDW1

SECTION: 3.4
6423-00-16-56-DB-01 Rev. C
Page 56 of 56

Note: The conductor Plan shown is indicative. Contractor shall locate exact
position of existing wells as part of scope of work of Pre-engineering
Survey.

Format No. EIL-1641-1924 Rev.1

Copyright EIL All rights reserved