Scribd
Upload
38 views1 page

Questions 512

The document discusses no-arbitrage relationships between different Coca-Cola bond structures: a unit consisting of a 9 7/8% Series A Note plus a warrant, a non-callable 9 7/8% Series B Note, and the call option embedded in the Series A Note. It asks how the no-arbitrage relationships are violated in the Eurobond market, and potential reasons for this violation, as well as how Coca-Cola takes advantage of it.

Uploaded by

SZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
38 views1 page

Questions 512

The document discusses no-arbitrage relationships between different Coca-Cola bond structures: a unit consisting of a 9 7/8% Series A Note plus a warrant, a non-callable 9 7/8% Series B Note, and the call option embedded in the Series A Note. It asks how the no-arbitrage relationships are violated in the Eurobond market, and potential reasons for this violation, as well as how Coca-Cola takes advantage of it.

Uploaded by

SZ
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as DOC, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

Coca-Cola Harmless Warrants

Q1. What is the no-arbitrage relationship between the value of a unit (i.e., a 9 7/8%
Series A Note plus a warrant) and the value of a non-callable 9 7/8% Series B Note?
Q2. What is the no-arbitrage relationship between the call option embedded in the
Series A Note and the warrant?
Q3. How are the no-arbitrage relationships in Q1 and Q2 violated in the Eurobond
market?
Q4. What are the potential reasons for the violation of the no-arbitrage relationship
in the Eurobond market? How is Coca-Cola using this violation of the no-arbitrage
relationship to its advantage???????,

You might also like