Fitch Revises South Africa's Outlook to Negative; Affirms at 'BBB-'

Fitch Ratings-Hong Kong-25 November 2016: Fitch Ratings has revised the Outlooks on South Africa's Outlook to Negative from Stable, while affirming
the Long-Term Foreign and Local Currency Issuer Default Ratings (IDRs) at 'BBB-'.
The issue ratings on South Africa's senior unsecured long-term foreign- and local-currency bonds have also been affirmed at 'BBB-'. The Country
Ceiling has been affirmed at 'BBB'. The Short-Term Foreign and Local Currency IDRs and the issue ratings on senior unsecured short-term local
currency securities have been affirmed at 'F3'. The rating on the RSA Sukuk No. 1 Trust has also been affirmed at 'BBB-', in line with South Africa's
Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR.
KEY RATING DRIVERS
The revision of the Outlooks on South Africa's Long-Term IDRs to Negative reflects the following key rating drivers:
Political risks to standards of governance and policy-making have increased and will remain high at least until the electoral conference of the African
National Congress (ANC) in December 2017, negatively affecting macroeconomic performance. The conference will elect a new ANC leader, who will
be the ANC's presidential candidate in national elections in 2019.
The in-fighting within the ANC and the government is likely to continue over the next year. In Fitch's view, this will distract policymakers and lead to
mixed messages that will continue to undermine the investment climate, thereby constraining GDP growth. A report by the public protector made
allegations of influence peddling and improper procurement practices involving close allies of the president, although it will be subject to a judicial
review and a commission of enquiry. The report underlines the risks to state-owned enterprise (SOE) governance and has led to the resignation of the
CEO of the state-owned electricity company Eskom.
The South African economy may have started recovering from a series of shocks, but business confidence remains depressed and investment has
continued to contract. We expect only modest GDP growth of 1.3% in 2017 and 2.1% in 2018, although this is an improvement from 0.5% in 2016. The
economy had been hit in 2015 and 2016 by electricity shortages, the worst drought in decades, a sharp fall in international prices for some of South
Africa's main mining commodities and rising policy uncertainty.
As a result of low GDP growth and weaker-than-expected tax revenues, the government in its Medium-Term Budget Policy Statement (MTBPS) raised
the budget deficit forecast for the fiscal year ending March 2017 (FY16/17) to 3.4% of GDP from 3.2% in the February budget, with a gradual narrowing
to 3.1% in FY17/18, 2.7% in FY18/19 and 2.5% in FY19/20. The deterioration would have been worse without the government's decision, announced in
the MTBPS, to raise additional revenue of ZAR13bn and lower the expenditure ceiling in FY17/18. Together with measures included in the February
budget, fiscal tightening in FY17/18 relative to previous plans will amount to 1% of GDP. The government has not announced which taxes are to be
raised, but the fiscal targets now look only mildly optimistic. Fitch expects the deficit to shrink to 2.8% in FY18/19 from 3.2% in FY17/18.
Total general government debt (including local government debt not covered by the MTBPS debt numbers) will rise to 55% at end-March 2019 from
51.5% at end-March 2016. The debt structure remains highly favourable, with 90.7% of debt denominated in local currency and an average maturity of
government debt securities of 14.6 years at end-September 2016.
Additional spending on student bursaries as a result of student protests was absorbed by using the contingency reserve, some one-off financing and a
re-prioritisation of other expenditures, but the protests showed that social pressures could lead to further spending needs. Growth of the working age
population of around 2% and high and rising unemployment, at 27.1% in the third quarter, also contribute to spending pressures. However, the fact that
expenditure ceilings introduced in 2012 have never been breached suggests such pressures have so far been well managed.
Debt of SOEs remains an important contingent liability to the sovereign. Debt of the nine major SOEs amounted to ZAR743bn (18.2% of GDP) at endMarch 2016, of which ZAR280bn was subject to government guarantees. In addition, the government provides guarantees on electricity prices to
independent power producers complementing Eskom's electricity generation.
ANC factional battles may undermine government efforts to improve the governance of SOEs, which could affect the plan to stream-line the SOE
portfolio. The plan to build nuclear power stations has run into substantial opposition because of concerns about governance. As a result, the
government announced in November that the first plant will not be commissioned until 2037, alleviating concerns over any medium-term fiscal impact.
The 'BBB-' Long-Term IDRs also reflect the following drivers:
The net international investment position turned positive in 2015, at 13% of GDP, for the first time since at least 1990, although this was largely due to
the depreciation of the rand. The current account deficit also remained on a narrowing trend in 1H16, partly reflecting import compression as well as a
lagged effect of earlier depreciation on competitiveness so that the current account deficit is likely to shrink to 3.9% of GDP, from 4.3% in 2015.
However, imports will strengthen again as the economy recovers gradually and gains in competitiveness could be eroded by continued high wage
growth, leading to a renewed widening in the current-account deficit in 2017 and 2018.
Despite weak macroeconomic conditions, the banking sector remains a rating strength. The total capital adequacy ratio of the system increased to
15.5% in September from 14.2% at end- 2015. However, total domestic credit growth slowed to 7.5% in August, the lowest since 2014 and only
moderately above inflation. Non-performing loans stood at 3.2% of total assets, barely above the trough of the current cycle of 3.1%, although a gradual
rise is expected, reflecting the rising average age of assets and the impact of continued economic weakness on asset quality. Inflation has risen back
above the upper limit of the inflation target range of 3%-6% of the South African Reserve Bank (SARB) but is likely to ease, to an average of 5.6% in
2018, so that SARB is unlikely to further raise its interest rates beyond the current level of 7%.
Indicators of economic development are weaker than 'BBB' category medians. GDP per capita at market prices is estimated at USD5,140 for 2016,
compared with a median of USD9,188. The World Bank's governance indicator is broadly in line with the median but this might not fully reflect the
recent political tensions.

SOVEREIGN RATING MODEL (SRM) and QUALITATIVE OVERLAY (QO)

Fitch's proprietary SRM assigns South Africa a score equivalent to a rating of 'BBB-' on the Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR scale.
In accordance with its rating criteria, Fitch's sovereign rating committee decided not to adopt the score indicated by the SRM as the starting point for its
analysis because the SRM output has migrated to 'BBB-' from 'BBB', but in our view this is potentially a temporary deterioration that may not be
sustained.
Consequently, Fitch's sovereign rating committee kept the starting point for the qualitative overlay adjustment at 'BBB' and adjusted the output from the
SRM to arrive at the final Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR by applying its QO, relative to rated peers, as follows:
- Macroeconomic Performance, Policies and Prospect: -1 notch, to reflect South Africa's weak growth prospects relative to the 'BBB' category median,
with important repercussions for public finances.
Fitch's SRM is the agency's proprietary multiple regression rating model that employs 18 variables based on three-year centred averages, including one
year of forecasts, to produce a score equivalent to a Long-Term Foreign Currency IDR. Fitch's QO is a forward-looking qualitative framework designed
to allow for adjustment to the SRM output to assign the final rating, reflecting factors within our criteria that are not fully quantifiable or not fully reflected
in the SRM.
RATING SENSITIVITIES
The following risk factors could, individually or collectively, result in a downgrade:
- Continued political instability that adversely affects standards of governance, the economy or public finances.
- A failure to stabilise the government debt/GDP ratio or an increase in contingent liabilities.
- Failure of GDP growth to recover sustainably, for example, due to sustained uncertainty about economic policy.
- Rising net external debt to levels that raise the potential for serious financing strains.
The Outlook is Negative. Consequently, Fitch does not currently anticipate developments with a high likelihood of leading to an upgrade. However,
future developments that may, individually or collectively, lead to a positive rating action include:
- A track record of improved growth performance.
- A marked narrowing in the budget deficit and a reduction in the government debt/GDP ratio.
- A narrowing in the current account deficit and improvement in the country's net external debt/GDP ratio.
KEY ASSUMPTIONS
Fitch expects global economic trends and commodity prices to develop as outlined in Fitch's September Global Economic Outlook.
Contact:
Primary Analyst
Jan Friederich
Senior Director
+852 2263 9910
Fitch (Hong Kong) Limited
19/F Man Yee Building
68 Des Voeux Road Central
Hong Kong

Secondary Analyst
Jermaine Leonard
Director
+852 2263 9830
Committee Chairperson
Tony Stringer
Managing Director
+44 20 3530 1219
Media Relations: Wai-Lun Wan, Hong Kong, Tel: +852 2263 9935, Email: [email protected].
Additional information is available on www.fitchratings.com
Applicable Criteria
Country Ceilings (pub. 16 Aug 2016) (https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/885997)
Criteria for Rating Sukuk (pub. 16 Aug 2016) (https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/885806)
Sovereign Rating Criteria (pub. 18 Jul 2016) (https://www.fitchratings.com/site/re/885219)
Additional Disclosures
Dodd-Frank Rating Information Disclosure Form (https://www.fitchratings.com/creditdesk/press_releases/content/ridf_frame.cfm?pr_id=1015343&cft=0)
Solicitation Status (https://www.fitchratings.com/gws/en/disclosure/solicitation?pr_id=1015343)
Endorsement Policy (https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory)

ALL FITCH CREDIT RATINGS ARE SUBJECT TO CERTAIN LIMITATIONS AND DISCLAIMERS. PLEASE READ THESE LIMITATIONS AND
DISCLAIMERS BY FOLLOWING THIS LINK: HTTPS://WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM/UNDERSTANDINGCREDITRATINGS
(https://www.fitchratings.com/understandingcreditratings). IN ADDITION, RATING DEFINITIONS AND THE TERMS OF USE OF SUCH RATINGS ARE
AVAILABLE ON THE AGENCY'S PUBLIC WEB SITE AT WWW.FITCHRATINGS.COM. PUBLISHED RATINGS, CRITERIA, AND METHODOLOGIES
ARE AVAILABLE FROM THIS SITE AT ALL TIMES. FITCH'S CODE OF CONDUCT, CONFIDENTIALITY, CONFLICTS OF INTEREST, AFFILIATE
FIREWALL, COMPLIANCE, AND OTHER RELEVANT POLICIES AND PROCEDURES ARE ALSO AVAILABLE FROM THE CODE OF CONDUCT
SECTION OF THIS SITE. FITCH MAY HAVE PROVIDED ANOTHER PERMISSIBLE SERVICE TO THE RATED ENTITY OR ITS RELATED THIRD

PARTIES. DETAILS OF THIS SERVICE FOR RATINGS FOR WHICH THE LEAD ANALYST IS BASED IN AN EU-REGISTERED ENTITY CAN BE
FOUND ON THE ENTITY SUMMARY PAGE FOR THIS ISSUER ON THE FITCH WEBSITE.
Copyright 2016 by Fitch Ratings, Inc., Fitch Ratings Ltd. and its subsidiaries. 33 Whitehall Street, NY, NY 10004. Telephone: 1-800-753-4824, (212)
908-0500. Fax: (212) 480-4435. Reproduction or retransmission in whole or in part is prohibited except by permission. All rights reserved. In issuing and
maintaining its ratings and in making other reports (including forecast information), Fitch relies on factual information it receives from issuers and
underwriters and from other sources Fitch believes to be credible. Fitch conducts a reasonable investigation of the factual information relied upon by it
in accordance with its ratings methodology, and obtains reasonable verification of that information from independent sources, to the extent such sources
are available for a given security or in a given jurisdiction. The manner of Fitchs factual investigation and the scope of the third-party verification it
obtains will vary depending on the nature of the rated security and its issuer, the requirements and practices in the jurisdiction in which the rated
security is offered and sold and/or the issuer is located, the availability and nature of relevant public information, access to the management of the
issuer and its advisers, the availability of pre-existing third-party verifications such as audit reports, agreed-upon procedures letters, appraisals,
actuarial reports, engineering reports, legal opinions and other reports provided by third parties, the availability of independent and competent thirdparty verification sources with respect to the particular security or in the particular jurisdiction of the issuer, and a variety of other factors. Users of
Fitchs ratings and reports should understand that neither an enhanced factual investigation nor any third-party verification can ensure that all of the
information Fitch relies on in connection with a rating or a report will be accurate and complete. Ultimately, the issuer and its advisers are responsible
for the accuracy of the information they provide to Fitch and to the market in offering documents and other reports. In issuing its ratings and its reports,
Fitch must rely on the work of experts, including independent auditors with respect to financial statements and attorneys with respect to legal and tax
matters. Further, ratings and forecasts of financial and other information are inherently forward-looking and embody assumptions and predictions about
future events that by their nature cannot be verified as facts. As a result, despite any verification of current facts, ratings and forecasts can be affected
by future events or conditions that were not anticipated at the time a rating or forecast was issued or affirmed.
The information in this report is provided as is without any representation or warranty of any kind, and Fitch does not represent or warrant that the
report or any of its contents will meet any of the requirements of a recipient of the report. A Fitch rating is an opinion as to the creditworthiness of a
security. This opinion and reports made by Fitch are based on established criteria and methodologies that Fitch is continuously evaluating and updating.
Therefore, ratings and reports are the collective work product of Fitch and no individual, or group of individuals, is solely responsible for a rating or a
report. The rating does not address the risk of loss due to risks other than credit risk, unless such risk is specifically mentioned. Fitch is not engaged in
the offer or sale of any security. All Fitch reports have shared authorship. Individuals identified in a Fitch report were involved in, but are not solely
responsible for, the opinions stated therein. The individuals are named for contact purposes only. A report providing a Fitch rating is neither a
prospectus nor a substitute for the information assembled, verified and presented to investors by the issuer and its agents in connection with the sale of
the securities. Ratings may be changed or withdrawn at any time for any reason in the sole discretion of Fitch. Fitch does not provide investment advice
of any sort. Ratings are not a recommendation to buy, sell, or hold any security. Ratings do not comment on the adequacy of market price, the suitability
of any security for a particular investor, or the tax-exempt nature or taxability of payments made in respect to any security. Fitch receives fees from
issuers, insurers, guarantors, other obligors, and underwriters for rating securities. Such fees generally vary from US$1,000 to US$750,000 (or the
applicable currency equivalent) per issue. In certain cases, Fitch will rate all or a number of issues issued by a particular issuer, or insured or
guaranteed by a particular insurer or guarantor, for a single annual fee. Such fees are expected to vary from US$10,000 to US$1,500,000 (or the
applicable currency equivalent). The assignment, publication, or dissemination of a rating by Fitch shall not constitute a consent by Fitch to use its
name as an expert in connection with any registration statement filed under the United States securities laws, the Financial Services and Markets Act of
2000 of the United Kingdom, or the securities laws of any particular jurisdiction. Due to the relative efficiency of electronic publishing and distribution,
Fitch research may be available to electronic subscribers up to three days earlier than to print subscribers.
For Australia, New Zealand, Taiwan and South Korea only: Fitch Australia Pty Ltd holds an Australian financial services license (AFS license no.
337123) which authorizes it to provide credit ratings to wholesale clients only. Credit ratings information published by Fitch is not intended to be used by
persons who are retail clients within the meaning of the Corporations Act 2001
Endorsement Policy - Fitch's approach to ratings endorsement so that ratings produced outside the EU may be used by regulated entities within the
EU for regulatory purposes, pursuant to the terms of the EU Regulation with respect to credit rating agencies, can be found on the EU Regulatory
Disclosures (https://www.fitchratings.com/regulatory) page. The endorsement status of all International ratings is provided within the entity summary
page for each rated entity and in the transaction detail pages for all structured finance transactions on the Fitch website. These disclosures are updated
on a daily basis.