Lesson Plan 3
Lesson Plan 3
Standard(s):
(9- 10.W.1) Write arguments to support claims in an analysis of substantive topics or texts, using valid reasoning
and relevant and sufficient evidence.
a. Introduce precise claim(s), distinguish the claim(s) from alternate or opposing claims, and create an organization
that establishes clear relationships among claim(s), counterclaims, reasons, and evidence.
b. Develop claim(s) and counterclaims fairly, supplying evidence for each while pointing out the strengths and
limitations of both in a manner that anticipates the audiences knowledge level and concerns.
(9-10.RL.1) Cite strong and thorough textual evidence to support analysis of what the text says explicitly as well as
inferences drawn from the text.
Objectives (Explicit):
Students Will Be Able To: dramatize Edgar Allan Poes The Tell Tale Heart by participating in various aspects of a
mock trial.
Students Will Be Able To: defend their claim for/against the narrator in The Tell Tale Heart by citing textual
evidence to support their argument.
Students Will Be Able To: summarize the mock trial and implement their own opinions by writing a 1-2 page
summary with textual support.
Evidence of Mastery (Measurable):
After the mock trial and a verdict is reached, students will write a 2-page summary on the trial. They will cite specific
quotes, claims, and examples from the trial to support their agreement/disagreement with the verdict.
I will grade their proficiency during the trial as well as their writing assignment on 2 separate rubrics.
o Trial Rubric:
Did the defense/prosecutors cite textual evidence to support their claim? Was their evidence
valid/comprehensible?
Did the jury demonstrate a clear understanding of the trial? Was their verdict cohesive with the
provided evidence?
Did the note-takers take clear, concise notes that demonstrated their knowledge of the text?
o Writing Rubric
Did the student understand how the verdict was reached?
Were the able to refute the evidence if they disagreed?
Did they provide substantial examples?
Sub-objectives, SWBAT (Sequenced from basic to complex):
Opening
Ask students to ponder this: What is the scariest movie you have ever seen? What made it so scary?
o Encourage direct examples
Play Edgar Allan Poe Ted Ed Lesson: http://ed.ted.com/featured/kpxLn1Hp
What do they think The Tell-Tale Heart look like if it was made into a movie? (Show movie clip)
Ask students to consider previous lesson on characterization/motivation.
Teacher Will:
Read The Tell-Tale Heart aloud
Set the scene: Turn off the lights in the class
room & have rain/thunderstorm audio playing in
the background.
o Make sure the students are engaged with
the story at all times.
After we read, I will lecture on a brief history of
Edgar Allan Poe, his writing styles, and what
thematic elements his incorporates into his
writing.
Co-Teaching Strategy/Differentiation
Instructional Input
Student Will:
I will provide printed lecture notes for students who are having difficulties grappling with the information. I will
ask them to highlight which portions they are struggling with, and conference with me so I may check for
understanding.
Teacher Will:
Student Will:
Guided Practice
Independent Practice
Ask them to give me a thumbs up/thumbs down to show that they understand. If there are any thumbs down, I will
ask and address their concerns with the assignment.
Teacher Will:
Student Will:
Create a discussion board post on our class website that allows students to discuss their ideas/thoughts/opinions
with their classmates.
Closing/Student Reflection/Real-life connections: Homework Assignment (after the trial)
Students will write a 1-2 page summary regarding the mock trial. They will need to answer the following questions:
1. What stance did you take at the beginning of the trial? (Did you think the narrator was guilty or innocent? Why?
Cite examples from the text.)
2. What was the verdict?
3. Do you agree/disagree? Why?
4. Was the evidence presented to convict/free the narrator plausible?
5. What other evidence could have been brought in to strengthen the case?