0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Attributes: Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

This document presents the results of a discriminant function analysis that was conducted to classify clothing brands into groups. Quality, fitting, and designs were the most important attributes that discriminated between the groups. The analysis resulted in Stoneage having the highest score on the first discriminant function, while Breakout had the lowest score.

Uploaded by

Ali Tariq Butt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
0% found this document useful (0 votes)
11 views

Attributes: Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

This document presents the results of a discriminant function analysis that was conducted to classify clothing brands into groups. Quality, fitting, and designs were the most important attributes that discriminated between the groups. The analysis resulted in Stoneage having the highest score on the first discriminant function, while Breakout had the lowest score.

Uploaded by

Ali Tariq Butt
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 9

Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficients

Function
1
Quality

.782

Variety_of_Colors

-.673

Designs

Attributes

.124

Value_For_Money

-.069

Convenience_of_Location

.145

Price

Brands

-.229

Availability_of_Sizes

.141

Fitting

.295

Outfitters

.085

Stoneage

.434

Leisure Club

-.122

Breakout

-.397
Structure Matrix
Function
1

Quality

.759*

Fitting

.452*

Designs

.409

Convenience_of_Location

.220

Variety_of_Colors
Availability_of_Sizes
Price
Value_For_Money

-.182
.282
-.198
.247

Pooled within-groups correlations between discriminating variables and standardized canonical discrim
Variables ordered by absolute size of correlation within function.
*. Largest absolute correlation between each variable and any discriminant function

Discriminant Function Coefficients


Function
2

3
-.521

.429

.194

-.019

.852

-.065

-.112

.480

.441

-.229

.181

.751

-.074

.069

.154

-.534

.203

.168

-.005

-.116

-.340

.057

.142

-.109

ructure Matrix
Function
2

3
.126

.331

.440

-.025

.751

.119

.594

-.012

.548*

.122

.315*

.201

.268

.747*

.320

.578*

ng variables and standardized canonical discriminant functions


function.
nd any discriminant function

Axis Title
-1.5

Functions at Group Centroids


Function
Brand
Outfitters
Stoneage

1
.085
1.0

.434

Leisure Club

-.122

Breakout

-.397

Unstandardized canonical discriminant functions evaluated at group means

0.0
0.0

-1.0

Axis Title

tions at Group Centroids


Function
2

3
.203

.168

-.005

-.116

-.340

.057

.142

-.109

ated at group means

1.5

Standardized Canonical Discriminant Function Coefficien


Function
1
Quality

.782

Variety_of_Colors

-.673

Designs

Attributes

.124

Value_For_Money

-.069

Convenience_of_Location

.145

Price

Brands

-.229

Availability_of_Sizes

.141

Fitting

.295

Outfitters

.085

Stoneage

.434

Leisure Club

-.122

Breakout

-.397
Structure Matrix
Function
1

Quality

.759*

Fitting

.452*

Designs

.409

Convenience_of_Location

.220

Variety_of_Colors
Availability_of_Sizes
Price
Value_For_Money

-.182
.282
-.198
.247

Pooled within-groups correlations between discriminating variables and standardized canonical discrim
Variables ordered by absolute size of correlation within function.
*. Largest absolute correlation between each variable and any discriminant function

nical Discriminant Function Coefficients


Function
2

3
-.521

.429

.194

-.019

.852

-.065

-.112

.480

.441

-.229

.181

.751

-.074

.069

.154

-.534

.203

.168

-.005

-.116

-.340

.057

.142

-.109

Structure Matrix
Function
2

3
.126

.331

.440

-.025

.751

.119

.594

-.012

.548*

.122

.315*

.201

.268

.747*

.320

.578*

ng variables and standardized canonical discriminant functions


function.
nd any discriminant function

Axis Title
-1.5

Functions at Group Centroids

Brand
Outfitters

1.0

Function
1
.085

Stoneage

.434

Leisure Club

-.122

Breakout

-.397

Unstandardized canonical discriminant functions evaluated at group means

0.0
0.0

-1.0

Axis Title

tions at Group Centroids


Function
2

3
.203

.168

-.005

-.116

-.340

.057

.142

-.109

ated at group means

1.5

You might also like