Scribd
Upload
514 views

Comparative Analysis 1

comparative analysis

Uploaded by

AkshayJoshi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
514 views

Comparative Analysis 1

comparative analysis

Uploaded by

AkshayJoshi
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as PDF or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1
Comparative Analysis Elements Location Case Study -I IIM Ahemedabd Case Study -2 IM Bangalore Inferance Both the Institutes are located ‘on prime areas and are well connected with Public transports] Surroundings Accessibility ‘Type of Building Classroms Faculty Wing -L.D.college -ISRO Colony -Gujrat University well connected with main roads. Maximum G+2 Area for Cassroom cluster per student- 16.15 Sq.m per Faculty - 34.7 Sq.m -Banergatta road -Banergatta National park -HSBC -Post Office -Apollo hospital ‘Well connected with Banergatta ‘Main Road. Maximum G+2 re Area forClassroom Cluster per Student -16.8 Sq.mm Area for Faculty Wing per Faculty - 55.7 Sq.m Both the Institutes are Surrounded by Educational institutes, IT companies, Hospitals ete. Both the Campus are completely | Pedistrian and vechicular movement is completely restricted. -Boththe campus are planned according to climatic conditions. Both the Campus are well Connected with Road networks. For Campus Planning building height shoud not be more than GH (Cluster per Student Average Area for Faculty Wing per Faculty - 45 Sq.m M.M.COLLEGE OF ARCHITECTURE, Gents- 25 Sq.m (2 no) Ladies- 25 Sq.m (2 no) per block. Gents- 25 Sq.m (2 no) Sufficient number of Toilets ‘are provided in both the Comparative Analysis AKSHAY JOSHI THESIS TOPIC - INDIAN INSTITUTE OF MANAGEMENT ‘STH YR BARCH

You might also like