Plant Soil

DOI 10.1007/s11104-009-9908-1

REGULAR ARTICLE

Characterization of bacterial endophytes of sweet

potato plants
Zareen Khan & Sharon L. Doty

Received: 21 July 2008 / Accepted: 22 January 2009

# Springer Science + Business Media B.V. 2009

Abstract Endophytic bacteria associated with sweet

potato plants (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) were
isolated, identified and tested for their ability to fix
nitrogen, produce indole acetic acid (IAA), and exhibit
stress tolerance. Eleven different strains belonging to
the genera, Enterobacter, Rahnella, Rhodanobacter,
Pseudomonas, Stenotrophomonas, Xanthomonas and
Phyllobacterium, were identified. Four strains were
shown to produce IAA (a plant growth hormone) and
one strain showed the ability to grow in nitrogen free
medium and had the nitrogenase subunit gene, nifH. To
determine if IAA production by the endophytes had
any role in protecting the cells against adverse
conditions, different stress tests were conducted. The
IAA producer grew well in the presence of some
antibiotics, UV and cold treatments but the response to
pH, osmotic shock, thermal and oxidative treatments
was the same for both the IAA producer and the no
IAA producer. To determine if IAA produced by the
strains was biologically relevant to plants, cuttings of
poplar were inoculated with the highest IAA producing
strain. The inoculated cuttings produced roots sooner
and grew more rapidly than uninoculated cuttings.
These studies indicate that endophytes of sweet potato
plants are beneficial to plant growth.
Responsible Editor: Jesus Mercado-Blanco.
Z. Khan : S. L. Doty (*)
College of Forest Resources, University of Washington,
Seattle, WA 98195-2100, USA
e-mail: [email protected]

Keywords Ipomoea batatas . Sweet potato .

Plant-microbe interaction . Indole acetic acid (IAA) .
Nitrogen fixation . Stress . Plant growth promotion
Introduction
Endophytes are microorganisms that reside within the
inner parts of plants without causing any disease
symptoms (Hallmann et al. 1997). Cultivable endophytic communities can be isolated after surface
sterilization of the plant material. Endophytes exist
in a range of tissue types within a broad range of
plants, colonizing the plant systemically with bacterial
colonies and biofilms, residing latently in intercellular
spaces, inside the vascular tissue or within cells
(Ulrich et al. 2008). Although the plant-endophyte
interaction has not been fully understood, it has been
reported that many isolates provide beneficial effects
to their hosts like preventing disease development by
synthesizing novel compounds and antifungal metabolites. Investigations of biodiversity of endophyte
strains for novel metabolites may identify new drugs
for the treatment of human, plant and animal diseases
(Strobel et al. 2004). Several bacterial endophytes have
been shown to support plant growth and increase
nutrient uptake by providing phytohormones (Jacobson
et al. 1994), low molecular weight compounds
(Frommel et al. 1991), enzymes (Glick et al. 1998),
antimicrobial substances like antibiotics (Bangera and
Thomashow 1996) and siderophores (OSullivan and

DO09908; No of Pages 10

Plant Soil

OGara 1992). Some endophytes offer increased

resistance to pathogens thus making them ideal
candidates for biological control (Madhaiyan et al.
2004). Other beneficial effects of endophytes to plants
include nitrogen fixation (Barraquio et al. 1997),
increased drought resistance (Nowak et al. 1995),
thermal protection (Redman et al. 2002), survival
under osmotic stress (Creus et al. 1998) and more
recently, their potential for enhanced degradation of
several pollutants has also been investigated (Reviewed
in Doty 2008).
Sweet potato (Ipomoea batatas (L.) Lam.) is a
resilient, easily propagated crop, growing well in
infertile and nitrogen (N) poor soils. Over 95% of the
global sweet potato crop is produced in developing
countries (Reiter et al. 2003). It has also shown
potential to tolerate and absorb heavy metal pollutants
like lead, iron and cadmium, as well as mixed
pollutants contained in landfill leachate (deAraujo et
al. 2004). In this paper we focus on the culturable
bacterial endophytes of sweet potato and their
possible contribution in the growth of the plant.

Materials and methods

Plant material and isolation of bacterial endophytes
Sweet potatoes were purchased from a grocery store
in Seattle, WA. In order to generate plants, in each
sweet potato a few inoculating sticks were inserted
and the potato was hung in a beaker of water, and
placed under light. When shoots emerged from the
potato and reached approximately 15 cm in height,
the rooted 10d old plants were transferred to pots
containing non sterile, 1:1 (w/w) ProMix (Premier
Horticulture, Quakertown, PA) and perlite (ThermO-Rock, Chandler, AZ). Four sweet potatoes were
used to generate the plants and were designated as
SP1, SP2, SP3 and SP4. Cuttings of 8 cm in length
were surface sterilized with 10% bleach for 10 min,
1% iodophor for 5 min and rinsed several times with
sterile water. The ends of the explants were removed
and the stems were incubated in the light for 1 w on
Murashige and Skoog (MS) medium containing 0.1%
phytagar (Murashige and Skoog 1962). Resulting
bacteria were subcultured overnight on Luria-Bertani
medium with mannitol glutamate and added salts
(MG/L) (Chilton et al. 1974). Single colonies were

selected (Table 1), grown in MG/L medium overnight, and stored in 33% glycerol at 80C for
subsequent characterization. To identify the role of
sweet potato endophytes in plant growth, we generated some internally sterile plants by propagating
them in MS medium containing antibiotics. The
concentration of the antibiotics used was determined
from previous experiments (data not shown) that was
enough to kill the endophytes and not harm the plant.
Validation of sterility was done by crushing the plants
in sterile conditions and growing the extract on MS
plates and checking for bacterial growth.
Bacteria identification using 16S rRNA sequences
Genomic DNA was prepared using standard methods
(Ausubel et al. 1995) with a cell lysis performed at
68C for 30 min (Doty et al. 2005). PCR was
performed using the universal 16S rRNA primers 8F (5- AGAGTTTGATCCTGGCTCAG-3) and
1492 (5- GGTTACCTTGTTACGACTT-3) as described previously (Doty et al. 2005). The thermocycler program was 94C for 15 s, 44C for 15 s,
72C for 30 s and it was repeated for 24 cycles.
Samples were subjected to electrophoresis in a 1%
agarose gel. The 1.5 Kb PCR products were purified
using Qiagen gel extraction kit (Qiagen; Valencia,
CA) subcloned into pGEM T Easy (Promega;
Madison, WI) and sequenced using T7 and SP6
primer sets on the vector by the University of
Washington Biochemistry Department Sequencing
Facility using the Big Dye Terminator v3.1 Cycle
Sequencing Kit (Applied Biosystems; Carlsbad, CA)
Table 1 Characteristics of isolated endophytes from sweet
potato
Endophyte code

Plant

Colony color
on MG/L plates

SPa
SPb
SPc
SPd
SPe
SPf
SPg
SPh
SPi
SPj
SPk

SP3
SP3
SP2
SP4
SP3
SP4
SP3
SP3
SP1
SP2
SP4

White
Pink
White
White
Pale yellow
White
White
White
Yellow
White
White

Plant Soil

were constructed using the algorithm of Jukes and

Cantor (Thompson et al. 1994) and the evolutionary
trees for the data sets were inferred from the neighborjoining method (Saitou and Nei 1987) by using MEGA
version 4.0.1 (Tamura et al. 2007).

and an ABI3730 XL sequencer (Applied Biosystems).

The obtained sequences were assembled using the
Seqman software (DNA STAR Inc.) and sequence
comparisons with public databases were performed via
the Internet at the National Center for Biotechnology
Information site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), by
employing the BLASTN algorithm (Altschul et al.
1997). Sequences were submitted to GenBank and
accession numbers were obtained (Fig. 1). Phylogenetic analysis was done using CLUSTAL W software
(Thompson et al. 1994). Evolutionary distance matrix

Growth on nitrogen- limited medium

Isolates from the frozen stocks were streaked on
MG/L medium and incubated at 30C overnight.
Isolated colonies were streaked on nitrogen free MS

98

AB098582 Enterobacter sp. TUT1014

SPj (FJ405369)
SPh (FJ405367)

99

DQ857896 Enterobacter aerogenes strain zjs04

EF175731 Enterobacter sp. Px6-4

100

SPi (FJ405368)
AM419020 Rahnella sp. NJ-8

95

AY253921 Rahnella aquatilis m 46

99

SPb (FJ405361)

97

DQ133506 Pseudomonas putida strain GM6

EF672049 Pseudomonas fluorescens strain Mc07

100

SPe (FJ405364)
100

EF166076 Rhodanobacter terrae strain GP18-1

SPg (FJ405366)
AY837726 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia clone B2.3.14

100
99

Spa (FJ405360)
SPd (FJ405363)

100

DQ337602 Xanthomonas retroflexus

EF471219 Xanthomanas sp. BBCT38
EU543577 Stenotrophomonas maltophilia
SPf (FJ405365)
SPk (FJ405370)
AY512821Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum
100 AY785332 Phyllobacterium myrsinacearum strain STM 961

SPc (FJ405362)

0.02

Fig. 1 Phylogenetic relationships among 11 isolates of

endophytic bacteria (marked in bold) obtained in culture from
sweet potato plants and the related bacterial species. The
Neighbor-Joining dendogram was derived from a 16S rRNA

sequence distance matrix (Jukes-Cantor). Bootstrap confidence

levels greater than 95% are indicated at the internodes.
GenBank accession numbers are shown in parentheses. Bar, 2
substitutions per 100 nucleotide positions

Plant Soil

medium (Caisson MSP007; http://www.caissonlabs.

com) containing either 3% sucrose or glucose as the
carbon source, and growth was assayed after 2 d.
For growth curve assays, a homogeneous inoculum
from the isolated colonies in the nitrogen free MS
medium was used to inoculate 25 ml of nitrogen free
MS medium with either 3% sucrose or glucose.
Growth was monitored using spectrophotometer and
measuring the optical density at 600 nm. Statistical
analysis was done using split plot ANOVA (Intercooled Stata 10.0, StataCorp LP, College Station,
TX) in order to account for the multiple measures
taken over time on each flask, and the replicated
flasks for each sample.
Cloning of nitrogenase gene fragments
Genomic DNA from isolates SPa and SPb was
subjected to nested PCR. This technique allows an
additional level of specificity utilizing two different
sets of primers, one set internal to the other. PCR
primers to amplify the highly conserved region of the
nitrogenase subunit H gene (nifH) were used as
described (Burgmann et al. 2004). The first set of
degenerate primers (nifH-universal for A site and
reverse site)forward primer 5-GCIWTITAYGGNA
ARGGNGG- 3 and reverse primer 5- GCRTAIA
BNGCCATCATYTC- 3- amplified a 464 bp region
of the nitrogenase gene (Burgmann et al. 2004).
Several Epicenter FailSafe PCR buffer series (A, B,
E, F, and G) were tried. Epicenter Pre-Mix Buffer A
was then selected. The thermocycler program was
5 min at 95C and then 11 s at 94C, 8 s at 48C, and
10 s at 72C for 40 cycles, followed by a polishing
step for 10 min at 72C. One microlitre of the 25 l
sample was then used in the nested reactions. The
series of nested primers described in Burgmann et al.
(2004) amplified a 371 bp sub region of the nifH
gene. The 371 bp products were gel purified and
subcloned into pGEM T Easy. Azotobacter vinelandii DNA served as a positive control and for
negative control water was used instead of DNA.
Sequencing of the inserts in both directions was
performed by the UW Biochemistry Department
Sequencing Facility using primers for the T7 and
SP6 regions of the vectors and sequence comparisons with public databases were performed via the
Internet at the National Center for Biotechnology
Information site (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/), by

employing the BLASTN algorithm (Altschul et al.

1997).
IAA production and root formation by endophytes
The sweet potato endophytic isolates were analyzed
for IAA production. For rapid quantitative estimation
in broth culture, the colorimetric method of Gordon
and Weber (1951) was used. The cultures were grown
in the dark for 7 d, sampled every day, centrifuged at
13000 x g for 10 min, and the production of IAA was
assayed in duplicated supernatant samples. The
presence of IAA in each supernatant was measured
colorimetrically by adding two parts of 0.01 M FeCl3
in 35% HClO4 to one part of supernatant followed by
reading the optical density at 530 nm after 25 min.
The recorded absorbances were read off a standard
curve prepared from pure IAA (Sigma-Aldrich, St.
Louis, MO). The experiment was done in triplicate.
Another experiment was done to see if the IAA
producing sweet potato endophytes can induce rooting in another plant species. We chose a hybrid poplar
clone, INRA 7171B4 (Populus tremula x P.alba)
(Doty et al. 2007) which was difficult to root. Poplar
cuttings about 8 cm were taken from the green house
and surface sterilized using 10% bleach (0.615%
NaClO) for 10 min and 1% iodophor for 5 min. The
ends of the explants were removed and the stems
were transferred to sterile culture tubes containing
10 ml of 1/2X Hoaglands solution (Hoagland and
Arnon 1950) and grown for 2w. The most IAA
producing endophyte, SPb (as determined from
above) was streaked on an MG/L plate and grown
overnight in MG/L broth. An inoculum of the
endophyte (OD600=0.5) was added to five sterile
tubes each containing MS growth media and one
plant. Five uninoculated plants were also maintained
and the tubes were incubated at 25C for 3w with a
16 h photoperiod.
Stress tests
To determine if the sweet potato endophytes that
produced high levels of IAA exhibited increased
tolerance to stress, the endophytes were exposed to
harsh conditions including heat and cold shock, UV
irradiation, osmotic and heat shock, oxidative stress
and antibiotic resistance. SPb, the most IAA producing endophyte was used for this study. SPh, that did

Plant Soil

not produce any IAA was used as a negative control.

Cells were grown aerobically at 30C in MG/L media.
Maximum IAA production was observed in 2 days.
At this point the cells were exposed to different stress
tests. UV irradiation of cell suspensions (10 ml) was
performed in the sterile hood exposing the cells to UV
light for 2 h. For osmotic shock, the cells were
incubated with 3 M sodium chloride for up to 2 h at
30C. For acid stress, cells were grown at pH 3 and 4
for 2 h at 30C. For oxidative stress, cells were treated
with 3% H2O2 and grown for 2 h at 30C. For heat
shock cells were exposed to 75C for 5 min by
immersion of cultures in a water bath. For cold
treatment, diluted cultures were plated on MG/L agar
plates, and the plates were sealed in plastic bags to
prevent drying, and incubated at 4C for 1w. For
antibiotic resistance the cultures were plated on MG/L
amended with one of the following antibiotics (g/
ml): timentin (Tm) (250) (GlaxoSmithKline,NC),
kanamycin (Km) (100) (plantMedia,Dublin,OH), ampicillin (Ap) (100) (Sigma,St.Louis,MO), chloramphenicol (Cm) (100) (Sigma,St.Louis,MO),
cefatoxime (Cf) (500) (Aventis Pharmaceuticals, NJ),
carbenicillin (Cb) 100 (Sigma,St.Louis,MO), and
vancomycin (Vm) (30) (Abraxis, Schaumburg, IL).
Growth was scored after overnight incubation of
plates at 30C.

Results

Growth on nitrogen free medium and identification

of the nitrogenase genes
As a first screen for the ability to fix nitrogen, the
isolated sweet potato endophytes were streaked onto
nitrogen-free medium plates with either glucose or
sucrose as the carbon source. Only SPa grew when the
carbon source was either sucrose or glucose; SPb grew
only in the presence of sucrose. The growth curve
experiments (Fig. 2) showed that SPa and SPb grew
well in nitrogen free media. Statistical analysis of the
data based on the primary analysis on log transformed
absorbance gave strong evidence that the groups do
differ between endophytes over time, with p<0.0001.
The nested PCR approach to identify the presence
of nifH genes resulted in an expected amplicon for
isolate Spa (approx. 371 bp). This PCR product was
purified, subcloned and sequenced. The nifH sequence of SPa was most closely related to Azotobacter vinelandii (99% identity). The universal nifH
primers only amplified a faint band of the expected
size in isolate SPb (Fig. 3). Non-specific bands were
also noticed, but after being cloned and sequenced
they yielded no significant match to any known
sequences in the databases.
IAA production and root induction
Four out of the eleven endophytes produced IAA
(Fig. 4). Measurements of IAA of the four IAA-

Identification

Growth in nitrogen free medium

0.4
0.35
Optical density OD600

Eleven culturable bacterial endophytes were isolated

from four sweet potato plants and characterized by
comparative sequence analysis of the 16S rRNA
region generated by PCR. The endophytes designated
as SPa-SPk grew in 24 h except for SPg which took
2 days to form colonies. Distinct round colonies of
sizes ranging from 13 mm and variable pigmentation
(white, pink, and pale to bright yellow) were observed
(Table 1). The 16S rRNA genes from most of the
isolates possessed 99100% similarity with a species
already described in the GenBank. All of the strains
belonged to the phylum proteobacteria, class- gammabacteria with the exception of Phyllobacterium that
belongs to the alphaproteobacteria. A phylogenetic
tree based upon nucleotide substitution values is
depicted in Fig. 1.

0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0
0

0.5

1.5

2.5

Time in days
AZ

AG

Spa

SPb

Fig. 2 Growth of sweet potato endophytes in nitrogen free

medium. Azotobacter vinelandii (AZ) was used as a positive
control. Agrobacterium tumefaciens (AG), which is a plant
associated bacterium was used as negative control. SPa grew
the best followed by SPb. The experiments were performed in
duplicate and the bars indicate standard deviations

Plant Soil
371bp

Fig. 3 Nested PCR amplification of nifH gene from SPa (lane

3) and SPb (lane 2) endophytes. The molecular weight standard
was a 100 bp ladder (lane 1). A strong band at 371 bp for Spa
confirmed the presence of nitrogenase gene. A faint band that
could not be sequenced was observed for SPb at the expected
size. Other non-specific bands were also obtained which DNA
sequences did not match any known sequences. Azotobacter
vinelandii DNA served as a positive control (lane 4) and for
negative control we used water (lane 5) instead of DNA

producing endophytes were significantly different

(P<0.05) from the other seven endophytes, which
did not produce any IAA. To test if the endophytes of
the sweet potato plant were helping it to grow, we
propagated endophyte free plants by growing them in
media containing antibiotics. These plants grew
poorly suggesting the role of endophytes in plant
growth. Also, when the maximum IAA producing
endophyte (SPb) was inoculated into a hybrid poplar
(Populus tremula x P.alba), INRA 7171B4, which is
normally difficult to root, excellent growth was
observed. After 3 weeks, four out of the five
endophyte-inoculated plants grew 5 cm taller, and
had highly branched root systems and several more
leaves than the uninoculated controls (Fig. 5).

that drastically modify all physico-chemical parameters of a living cell. To test whether IAA production
affected cell viability at temperatures that normally
prevent growth, diluted cultures were plated on agar
plates and inoculated at different temperatures.
Isolate SPb survived cold treatment whereas SPh
did not grow. The UV survival analysis showed that
the IAA producing endophyte was more resistant
(more CFU) to UV irradiation compared to the
negative control. Finally, responses to heat shock,
low pH, osmolarity and oxidative damage were
similar (Table 2).

Discussion
Endophytes isolated from four sweet potato plants
exhibited a wide range of phenotypic diversity and
important functions. Growth in nitrogen free media,
and the presence of nifH sequences verified in one of
the isolate supports the hypothesis that the sweet
potato endophytes may be of diazotrophic nature.
Further studies are needed to determine if the
endophytes might contribute to the N input in sweet
potato plants that grow well in unfertile soil.
Previous reports indicated that associative N2 fixation contributes to the N uptake in sweet potato
plants (Yoneyama et al. 1998; Hill et al. 1990).
Nitrogen fixing endophytes like Azospirillum sp.
Indole acetic acid (IAA) production by sweet potato endophytes
0.5
0.45

Stress tests
Absorbance at 530nm

It has been reported that higher amounts of IAA

resulted in increased tolerance to stress, more active
bacterial metabolism (Bianco et al. 2006; de Melo et
al. 2004) and enhanced plant growth (Camerini et al.
2008). To determine if the sweet potato endophytes
also had this characteristic, we chose SPb (maximum
IAA producer) and SPh, that did not produce any
IAA and was used as a negative control. Isolate SPb
grew well in the presence of antibiotics including
ampicillin, chloramphenicol, carbenicillin and vancomycin whereas no growth was observed when
cefatoxime, timentin and kanamycin were present
(Table 2). SPh did not tolerate any of the tested
antibiotics. Cold and heat shock are physical stresses

0.4
0.35
0.3
0.25
0.2
0.15
0.1
0.05
0

SPb

Spe

Spi

SPj

Sweet potato endophytes

Fig. 4 Production of IAA by sweet potato endophytes. IAA

reacts with FeCl3 and HClO4, and the absorbance of the color
produced was measured at 530 nm on a spectrophotometer. SPb
produced the maximum IAA followed by SPe, SPi and SPj.
The experiment was performed in triplicate and the bars
indicate standard deviations

Plant Soil
Fig. 5 Root formation by
an IAA producing endophyte SPb in a hybrid poplar clone. When inoculated
into INRA 7171B4, four
out of the five plants
showed root formation and
increased plant growth
when compared to uninoculated controls

to synthesize IAA production is widespread among

soil and plant associated bacteria (Verma et al.
2001). Microorganisms including rhizobia, mycorrhizal fungi and pseudomonads which inhabit the
aerial or subterranean surfaces of plants have been
shown to be capable of IAA synthesis. The microbial
synthesis of plant growth regulators is an important
factor in soil fertility (Kampert and Strzelczyk
1975). Our results support that IAA production by
some sweet potato endophytes could influence the
host growth in low fertile soils. It has also been
shown that bacteria that promote plant growth in a
given plant species may have no effect or even
inhibit the growth of another one (Lazarovits and
Nowak 1997). In our study the most IAA producing
sweet potato endophyte showed a plant growth
promoting effect when inoculated into another plant.
Cuttings of INRA 7171B4 do not root when
exogeneous auxin is provided, so perhaps the
endophytes provide more than just the hormone
improving the nutritional status of plants. Growth

(Hill et al. 1983) and Gluconacetobacter diazotrophicus strains (Paula et al. 1991) were isolated from
root and aerial part of sweet potato plants, respectively. Reiter et al. (2003) identified potential
nitrogen fixing endophytes in seven sweet potato
varieties collected in Uganda and Kenya. The nifH
gene sequences had high homologies to the nitrogenase reductases of known nitrogen fixing bacteria.
The authors suggested that the presence of these
bacteria might contribute to the N input in sweet
potato plants grown in different soils on small scale
farms in Africa where no fertilizer is applied. In our
study since Spa showed the presence of nitrogenase
gene, we are currently doing experiments to investigate if it could help the sweet potato plant to grow
in nitrogen limited conditions.
Some of the isolated endophytes of sweet potato
synthesized the phytohormone IAA, which is involved in plant stem and root growth regulation. It is
the most potent native auxin and is synthesized by
plants from the amino acid tryptophan. The capacity

Table 2 Resistance of SPb (IAA producer) and SPh (IAA non-producer) isolates to various stress conditions and antibiotics
Endophytes selected

SPb
SPh

Cf

Tm

Km

Ap

Cm

Cb

Vm

4C

UV exposure (CFU)

3102
1.5102

3.5102
3.6102

Heat shock

+
+

pH

NaCl

H2O2

(3M)

(3%)

+
+

+
+

+
+

+
+

(+) growth (-) no growth

Cf-cefatoxime, Tm-Timentin, Km-Kanamycin, Ap-Ampicillin, Cm-Chloramphenicol, Cb-carbenicillin Vm-Vancomycin.

Plant Soil

promoting effects by endophytic bacteria can also be

cultivar specific (Bensalim et al. 1998). Further tests
are underway to check if the IAA producing sweet
potato endophytes are nonspecific.
Studies have shown that IAA triggers an increased level of protection against external adverse
conditions by coordinately enhancing different cellular defence systems (Bianco et al. 2006). These
authors investigated the effect of IAA treatment on
bacterial cells and demonstrated that the cells were
tolerant to a variety of stress conditions. This is in
contrast to our findings where we observed that the
IAA producer (SPb) and the non-producer (SPh)
were both resistant to low pH, heat, osmotic and
oxidative treatments. However, SPb was tolerant to
certain antibiotics, UV irradiation and cold stress.
Since no correlation between IAA production and
stress response was found, other IAA-producing
endophytes were not further tested. We speculate
that the endophytes might be expressing certain
stress proteins which assist in refolding of denatured
proteins to help protect themselves from adverse
conditions. Protective effects of endophytes on the
plants and their survival in adverse environmental
conditions have also been shown (Mattos et al.
2001). Endophytes produce proteins and enzymes
with important biological functions that help in plant
development (Sahai and Manocha 1993). Pleban et
al. (1997) isolated endophytic B.cereus from mustard
that produced an enzyme stable between pH 4 and
8.5 and significantly protected cotton seedlings from
root rot disease caused by Rhizoctonia solani.
Paenibacillus amylolyticus, an endophytic isolate
from coffee cherries possessed thermo stable properties and pH stability and its bioactivity was hardly
influenced by EDTA and any metal ion (ReinholdHurk and Hurek 1998; Sakiyama et al. 2001). Other
reports have indicated that bacterial endophytes
provide nutrient and mineral input to the plants
(Kim et al. 2002; Pacovsky 1988; Malinowski et al.
2000), reduce heavy metal contamination (Malinowski
et al. 2004), ameliorate disease development (Benhamou
et al. 1996) and help acclimatize plants to environment
stresses (Lazarovits and Nowak 1997). Thus endophytes
endow their host plants with many benefits and their
commercial potential could reasonably receive more
attention.
A diverse array of bacterial species have been
reported to be endophytic including Acetobacter,

Arthrobacter, Bacillus, Burkholderia, Enterobacter,

Herbaspirillum and Pseudomonas (Lodewyckz et al.
2002). The 16S rRNA of isolate SPb showed close
relatedness to Rahnella aquatilis. Literature shows
that Rahnella aquatilis is a plant associated bacterium
and a nitrogen fixer. It was isolated from rhizosphere
of wheat and maize and had the ability to reduce
acetylene (indication of nitrogenase activity) in pure
culture and in association with the host plant (Berge et
al. 1991). Rahnella and Pseudomonas were identified
as endophytes found inside seeds of Norway spruce
where they were associated with plant growth
promoting activity and biological control potential
(Katarina et al. 2005).
The 16S rRNA gene sequence of SPe was closely
related to that of Pseudomonas (100% identity).
Beneficial Pseudomonas strains are frequently found
associated with plants where they act as Plant Growth
Promoting Bacteria (PGPB) by suppressing growth of
pathogens or by producing plant growth hormones.
Zaidi (2003) showed that when seeds of soybean were
inoculated with a strain of Pseudomonas that produced IAA, the plants increased seed emergence.
They also had increased shoot and root length,
increased dry weight, increased numbers of nodules,
and improved nutrient uptake. The bacteria were also
resistant to several antibiotics.
There were several other isolates from sweet potato
(SPh, SPi, SPj) that matched Enterobacter species.
Enterobacteria, the most frequently occurring genera
reported as endophytes are found in soil, water, fruits,
vegetables, grains, flowering plants, and trees, and
can be plant pathogens (Lodewyckz et al. 2002).
Species of E. cloacae have been identified as
endophytes of rice plants and had the ability to fix
nitrogen (Ladha et al. 1983) and promote plant
growth (Nie et al. 2002).
The sequence of 16S rRNA fragments of Spa and
SPd had 100% identity with Stenotrophomonas
maltophilia. Strains of this species have been isolated
from RDX (Hexahydro-1,3,5-trinitro-1,3,5-triazine)
and PAH (Polyaromatic hydrocarbon) contaminated
soils (Binks et al. 1995; Boonchan et al. 1998). Some
of the strains have been found to be multidrug
resistant (Garrison et al. 1996), and colonizers of
plant rhizosphere (Berg et al. 2005). This genus was
among several other bacteria isolated as an endophyte
in coffee seeds (Vega et al. 2005). Lata et al. (2006)
found endophytic bacteria belonging to Pseudomonas

Plant Soil

and Stenotrophomonas associated with Echinacea

plants.
Isolates SPf and SPk matched Xanthomonas sp.
Xanthomonas is a genus of proteobacteria, many of
which cause plant diseases. Some strains have always
been found in association with plants. Tanprasert and
Reed (1997) identified these as endophytes isolated
from strawberry.
The sequence of the 16S rRNA fragment of SPg
had 100% identity with Rhodanobacter species. Strains
of this group have been isolated from soil (Weon et al.
2007) and were found to degrade carcinogens (Kanaly
et al. 2002) and have biocontrol activity (Clercq et al.
2006). The presence of an endophyte that resembles a
strain that degrades carcinogens is an encouraging
result since it has been shown that several endophytic
strains present in different plants have the potential to
degrade pollutants.
The 16S rRNA sequence of sweet potato endophyte, SPc, had 100% identity with Phyllobacterium
sp. which is a plant growth promoting bacteria
(Mantelin et al. 2006; Bertrand et al. 2001) able to
fix nitrogen (Lambert and Joos 1989). It has been
isolated from the rhizosphere of mangroves (Adriana
et al. 2001) and sugar beet plants (Lambert et al.
1990). It has also been found to increase availability
of nutrients in the rhizosphere positively influencing
root growth and morphology and promoting other
plant microbe symbioses (Vessey 2003).
Since sweet potato plants are hardy, fast growing,
have an extensive root system, grow in poor soils and
have a wide geographical distribution, they can be
well suited for phytoremediation applications to clean
up land contaminated with harmful pollutants. Also
this starch rich root crop is a potential biofuel source
and the tubers can be harvested after phytoremediation is complete to make liquid biofuels. This
preliminary study yielded important uses of the
endophytes to the sweet potato plants. We are
currently investigating if any of these endophytes
can aid in phytoremediation of carcinogenic compounds as well as help in plant development under
different environmental stresses (temperature, osmosis, dessication).
Acknowledgements We thank undergraduate student helper
Amanda Thornton for helping with the isolation of endophytes
and the United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) for
funding this project (grant no: 58-3148-5159)

Appendix

Table 3 ANOVA analysis

Source

Partial SS

df MS

Model
11.7247352
19 .617091327 75.98
Sample
8.51532782
3 2.83844261 122.51
Flask|Sample
.185357703 8 .023169713
Time
2.3544058
2 1.1772029
144.94
Time*Sample
.669643897 6 .111607316 13.74
Residual
.129953838 16 .008122115
Total
11.8546891
35 .338705402

Prob > F
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000
0.0000

References
Adriana R, Holguin G, Glick BR et al (2001) Synergism
between Phyllobacterium sp. (N2-fixer) and Bacillus
licheniformis (P-solubilizer), both from a semiarid mangrove rhizosphere. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 35(2):181187.
doi:10.1111/j.1574-6941.2001.tb00802.x
Altschul SF, Madden TL, Schaffer AA et al (1997) Gapped
BLAST and PSI-BLAST: a new generation of protein
database search programs. Nucleic Acids Res 25:3389
3402. doi:10.1093/nar/25.17.3389
Ausubel F, Brent R, Kingston RE et al (1995) Short protocols in
molecular biology. E d. John Wiley & Sons, Inc, New York
Bangera MG, Thomashow LS (1996) Characterization of a
genomic locus required for synthesis of the antibiotic 2,4diacetylphloroglucinol by the biological control agent
Pseudomonas fluorescens Q287. Mol Plant Microbe
Interact 9:8390
Barraquio WL, Revilla L, Ladha JK (1997) Isolation of
endophytic diazotrophic bacteria from wetland rice. Plant
Soil 194:1524. doi:10.1023/A:1004246904803
Benhamou N, Kloepper JW, Quadt-Hallman A et al (1996)
Induction of defence related ultrastructural modifications
in pea root tissues inoculated with endophytic bacteria.
Plant Physiol 112:919929
Bensalim S, Nowak J, Asiedu S (1998) A plant growth
promoting rhizobacterium and temperature effects on
performance of 18 clones of potato. Am J Potato Res
75:145152
Berg G, Eberl L, Hartmann A (2005) The rhizosphere as a
reservoir for opportunistic human pathogenic bacteria.
Environ Microbiol 7:16731685. doi:10.1111/j.14622920.2005.00891.x
Berge O, Heulin T, Achouak W et al (1991) Rahnella aquatilis,
a nitrogen fixing enteric bacterium associated with the
rhizosphere of wheat and maize. Can J Microbiol 37:195
203
Bertrand H, Nalin R, Bally R et al (2001) Isolation and
identification of the most efficient plant growth promoting
bacteria associated with canola (Brassica napus). Biol
Fertil Soils 33:152156. doi:10.1007/s003740000305

Plant Soil
Bianco C, Imperlini E, Calogero R et al (2006) Indole 3-acetic
acid improves Escherichia colis defences to stress. Arch
Microbiol 185:373382. doi:10.1007/s00203-006-0103-y
Binks PR, Nicklin S, Bruce N (1995) Degradation of
Hexahydro-1,3,5-Trinitro-1,3,5-Triazine (RDX) by Stenotrophomonas maltophilia PB1. Appl Environ Microbiol
61:13181322
Boonchan S, Britz ML, Stanley GA (1998) Surfactant enhanced
biodegradation of high molecular weight PAHs by
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia. Biotechnol Bioeng
59:482494. doi:10.1002/(SICI)1097-0290(19980820)
59:4<482::AIDBIT11>3.0.CO;2C
Burgmann H, Widmer F, Sigler WV et al (2004) New molecular
screening tools for the analysis of free living diazotrophs
in soil. Appl Environ Microbiol 70:240247. doi:10.1128/
AEM.70.1.240247.2004
Camerini S, Senatore B, Lonardo E et al (2008) Introduction of
a novel pathway for IAA biosynthesis to rhizobia alters
vetch root nodule development. Arch Microbiol 190:67
77. doi:10.1007/s00203-008-0365-7
Chilton MD, Currier T, Farrand S et al (1974) Agrobacterium
tumefaciens DNA and PS8 bacteriophage DNA not
detected in crown gall tumors. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA
71:36723676. doi:10.1073/pnas.71.9.3672
Clercq D, Trappen SV, Cleenwerck I et al (2006) Rhodanobacter spathiphylli sp.nov., a gammaproteobacterium
isolated from the roots of Spathiphyllum plants grown in
a compost amended potting mix. Int J Syst Evol Microbiol
56:17551759. doi:10.1099/ijs.0.64131-0
Creus CM, Sueldo RJ, Barassi C (1998) Water relations in
Azospirillum inoculated wheat seedlings under osmotic
stress. Can J Bot 76:238244. doi:10.1139/cjb-76-2-238
deAraujo BS, de Oliveira JO, Machado SS et al (2004)
Comparative studies of the peroxidases from hairy roots
of Daucus carota, Ipomoea batatas and Solanum aviculare. Plant Sci 167:11511157
de Melo MP, Pithon-Curi TC, Curi R (2004) Indole-3-acetic
acid increases glutamine utilization by high peroxidase
activity-presenting leucocytes. Life Sci 75:17131725
Doty SL, Dosher MR, Singleton GL et al (2005) Identification
of an endophytic rhizobium in stems of Populus. Symbiosis 39:2735
Doty SL, James CA, Moore AL et al (2007) Enhanced
phytoremediation of volatile environmental pollutants with
transgenic trees. Proc Natl Acad Sci 104:1681616821
Doty SL (2008) Tansley review: enhancing phytoremediation
through the use of transgenics and endophytes. New Phytol
179:318333. doi:10.1111/j.1469-8137.2008.02446.x
Frommel MI, Nowak J, Lazarovits G (1991) Growth enhancement and developmental modifications of in vitro grown
potato (Solanum tuberosum sp. tuberosum) as affected by a
nonfluorescent Pseudomonas sp. Plant Physiol 96:928936
Garrison MW, Anderson DE, Campbell DM et al (1996)
Stenotrophomonas maltophilia: emergence of multidrug
resistant strains during therapy in an in vitro pharmacodynamic chamber model. Antimicrobial agents and Chemotherapy 40:28592864
Glick BR, Penrose DM, Li J (1998) A model for the lowering
of plant ethylene concentrations by plant growth promoting bacteria. J Theor Biol 190:6368

Gordon SA, Weber RP (1951) Colorimetric estimation of

indole acetic acid. Plant Physiol 26:192195
Hallmann J, Quadt-Hallmann A, Mahaffee WF et al (1997)
Endophytic bacteria in agricultural crops. Can J Microbiol
43:895914
Hill WA, Bacon Hill P, Crossman SM et al (1983) Characterisation of N2-fixing bacteria associated with sweet potato
roots. Can J Microbiol 29:860862
Hill WA, Dodo H, Hahn SK et al (1990) Sweet potato root and
biomass production with and without fertilization. Agron J
82:11201122
Hoagland DR, Arnon DI (1950) The water culture method for
growing plants without soil. Circular 347, Calif Agric
Expt Stn, University of California, Berkeley, CA
Jacobson CB, Pasternak JJ, Glick BR (1994) Partial purification
and characterization of 1-amino-cyclopropane-1-carboxylate
deaminase from the plant growth promoting rhizobacterium
Pseudomonas putida GR 122. Can J Microbiol 40:1019
1025
Kampert M, Strzelczyk E (1975) Synthesis of auxins by fungi
isolated from the roots of pine seedlings (Pinus silvestries
L.) and from soil. Acta Microbiol Paleon Ser B 7:223230
Kanaly RA, Harayama S, Watanabe K (2002) Rhodanobacter
sp. strain BPC1 in a Benzo(a)pyrene mineralizing bacterial
consortium. Appl Environ Microbiol 68:58265833
Katarina C, Hojka K, Ravnikar M et al (2005) Bacterial
endophytes from seeds of Norway spruce (Picea abies L.
Karst). FEMS Microbiol Letters 244:341345
Kim KY, Cho YS, Sohn BK et al (2002) Cold storage of mixed
inoculum of Glomus intraradius enhances root colonization, phosphorous status and growth of hot pepper. Plant
Soil 238:267272
Ladha JK, Barraquio WL, Watanabe I (1983) Isolation and
identification of nitrogen fixing Enterobacter cloacae and
Klebsiella planticola associated with rice plants. Can J
Microbiol 29:13011308
Lambert B, Joos H (1989) Fundamental aspects of rhizobacterial plant growth promotion research. Trends Biotechnol
7:215219
Lambert B, Joos H, Dierickx S et al (1990) Identification and
plant interaction of a Phyllobacterium sp., a predominant
rhizobacterium of young sugar beet plants. Appl Environ
Microbiol 56:10931102
Lata H, Li XC, Silva B et al (2006) Identification of IAA
producing endophytic bacteria from micropropagated
echinacea plants using 16S rRNA sequencing. Plant Cell
Tissue Organ Cult 85:353359
Lazarovits G, Nowak J (1997) Rhizobacteria for improvement
of plant growth and establishment. HortScience 32:188
192
Lodewyckz C, Vangronsveld J, Porteous F et al (2002)
Endophytic bacteria and their potential applications. Crit
Rev Plant Sci 21:583606
Madhaiyan M, Poonguzhali S, Senthilkumar M et al (2004)
Growth promotion and induction of systemic resistance in
rice cultivar Co-47 (Oryza sativa L.) by Methylobacterium
sp. Bot Bull Acad Sin 45:315324
Malinowski DP, Alloush GA, Belesky DP (2000) Leaf
endophyte Neotyphodium coenophialum modifies mineral
uptake in tall fescue. Plant Soil 227:115126

Plant Soil
Malinowski DP, Zuo H, Belesky DP et al (2004) Evidence of
copper binding by extracellular root exudates of tall fescue
but not perennial ryegrass infected with Neotyphodium sp.
endophytes. Plant Soil 267:112
Mantelin S, Desbrosses G, Larcher M et al (2006) Nitratedependent control of root architecture and N nutrition are
altered by a plant growth-promoting Phyllobacterium sp.
Planta 223:591603
Mattos KA, Jones C, Heise N et al (2001) Structure of an acidic
exopolysachharide produced by the diazotrophic endophytic bacterium Burkholderia brasiliensi. Eur J Biochem
268:31743179
Murashige T, Skoog F (1962) A revised medium for rapid
growth and bioassays with tobacco tissue culture. Plant
Physiol 15:473497
Nie L, Shah S, Rashid A et al (2002) Phytoremediation of
arsenate contaminated soil by transgenic canola and the
plant growth promoting bacterium Enterobacter cloacae
CAL2. Plant Physiol Biochem 40:355361
Nowak J, Asiedu SK, Lazarovits G (1995) Enhancement of in
vitro growth and transplant stress tolerance of potato and
vegetable plantlets co-cultured with a plant growth promoting pseudomonad bacterium. In: Carre F, Chagvardieff P
(eds) Proc. International Symposium on Ecophysiology and
Photosynthetic in Vitro Cultures, Aix-en-Provence, France
CEA, Cadarache, France, pp173180
O Sullivan DJ, O, Gara F (1992) Traits of fluorescent
Pseudomonas sp. involved in suppression of plant root
pathogens. Microbial Rev 56:662676
Pacovsky RS (1988) Influence of inoculation with Azospirillum
brasilense and Glomus fasciculatum on sorghum nutrition.
Plant Soil 110:283287
Paula MA, Reis UM, Dobereiner J (1991) Interactions of
Golum clarum with Acetobacter diazotropicus in infection
of sweet potato, sugarcane and sweet sorghum. Biol Fertil
Soils 11:111115
Pleban S, Chernin L, Chet I (1997) Chitinolytic activity of an
endophytic strain of Bacillus cereus. Lett Appl Microbiol
25:284288
Redman RS, Sheehan KB, Stout RG et al (2002) Thermotolerance
generated by plant/fungal symbiosis. Science 298:1581
Reinhold-Hurk B, Hurek T (1998) Life in grasses:diazotrophic
endophytes. Trends Microbiol 6:139144
Reiter B, Burgmann H, Burg K et al (2003) Endophytic gene
diversity in African sweet potato. Can J Microbiol
49:549555

Sahai AS, Manocha MS (1993) Chitinases of fungi and plants:

their involvement in morphogenesis and host-parasite
interaction. FEMS Microbiol Rev 11:317338
Saitou N, Nei M (1987) The neighbor-joining method: a new
method for reconstructing phylogenetic trees. Mol Biol
Evol 4:406425
Sakiyama CCH, Paula EM, Pereira PC et al (2001) Characterization of pectin lyase produced by an endophytic strain
isolated from coffee cherries. Lett Appl Microbiol 33:117
121
Strobel G, Daisy B, Castillo U et al (2004) Natural products
from endophytic microorganisms. J Nat Prod 67:257
268
Tamura K, Dudley J, Nei M et al (2007) MEGA4: Molecular
Evolutionary Genetics Analysis (MEGA) software version
4.0. Mol Biol Evol 24:15961599
Tanprasert P, Reed BM (1997) Detection and identification of
bacterial contaminants from strawberry runner explants. In
Vitro Cell Dev Biol 33:221226
Thompson JD, Higgins DG, Gibson TJ (1994) CLUSTAL W:
improving the sensitivity of progressive multiple sequence
alignment through sequence weighting, position-specific
gap penalties and weight matrix choice. Nucleic Acids Res
22:46734680
Ulrich K, Ulrich A, Ewald D (2008) Diversity of endophytic
bacterial communities in poplar grown under field conditions. FEMS Microbiol Ecol 63:169180
Vega FE, Ripoll MP, Posada F et al (2005) Endophytic bacteria
in Coffea arabica L. J Basic Microbiol 45:371380
Verma SC, Ladha JK, Tripathi AK (2001) Evaluation of
plant growth promoting and colonization ability of
endophytic diazotrophs from deep water rice. J Biotech
91:127141
Vessey JK (2003) Plant growth promoting rhizobacteria as
biofertilizers. Plant Soil 255:571586
Weon HY, Kim BY, Hong SB et al (2007) Rhodanobacter
ginsengisoli sp. nov and Rhodanobacter terrae sp. nov.
isolated from soil cultivated with Korean ginseng. Int J
Syst Evol Microbiol 57:28102813
Yoneyama T, Terakado J, Masuda T (1998) Natural abundance
of 15N in sweet potato, pumpkin, sorghum and castor
bean: possible input of N2 derived nitrogen in sweet
potato. Biol Fertil Soils 26:152154
Zaidi SFA (2003) Biocontrol of Fusarium oxysporium by plant
growth promoting rhizobacteria in soybean. Ann Agr Res
24:676678