MAT Foundation Design
MAT Foundation Design
FOUNDATION DESIGN
Foundations are structural elements that transfer loads from the building
or individual columns to the earth. If these loads are to be properly
transmitted, foundations must be designed to prevent excessive settlement
or rotation, to minimize differential settlement and to provide adequate
safety against sliding and overturning. Most foundations may be classified as
follows:
a) Soil strata
b) Bearing capacity and standard penetration test value N of soil
c) Type of the structure
d) Type of loads
e) Permissible differential settlement and
f) Economy
Total load under the footing must be less than the permissible bearing
capacity of the soil to prevent excessive settlement. In general foundation
should resist vertical, horizontal load and moments. In cases where the
bearing capacity of the soil is weak, the super structure load is large and the
soil is not uniform, foundations which can transfer the load to large area of
foundation soil have to be selected.
The site for the building is in the capital city of Ethiopia (Addis Ababa). So,
the site condition must be taken from representative values of the site. For
this building specific site condition of the site is not exactly known but
representative value is taken. The soil type in Addis Ababa is mostly clayey
soil with allowable bearing capacity of 150Mpa (taken from Alemayehu
Teferas book).
Check
The approximate area of the total footing is calculating as shown below.
1666.8 0.13
225= Lx
2 {1 Lx }
0.13
By trial & error, Lx2 = 7.41(1 + Lx )
Lx = 3.25m & Ly = 2*Ly = 6.5m
Axial Mx
Poin load(K (KN My(KN Area(
t N) m) m) m2)
-
1902. 3.33 -
A6 96 3 34.378 8.4576
2417. 1.17 10.742
F6 12 5 -5.19 76
3662. - 16.279
B6 78 6.57 0.08 02
3892. 0.85 17.301
C6 85 4 1.648 56
4064. 18.062
D6 11 3.77 -4.312 71
Final year project Department of Civil Engineering
Jimma University 2010
Structural design of G+7 building with basement
4134. 18.377
E6 84 2.6 -1.575 07
-
1739. 1.03 7.7295
F5 15 9 -3.189 56
1464. 0.30 6.5097
F4 69 5 1.493 33
-
3001. 0.07 13.339
F3 35 4 5.771 33
-
3395. 2.87 15.091
F2 68 9 5.151 91
2143. 1.51 9.5268
F1 55 6 -5.003 89
3770. 15.6 16.759
E1 95 57 9.891 78
-
6601. 2.62 29.338
E2 09 -2.606 2 18
-
5734. 1.28 25.488
E3 84 -3.425 7 18
-
3030. 121.0 7.88 13.469
E4 6 24 7 33
4339. 60.38 18.4 19.284
E5 1 2 27 89
-
5040. 3.25 22.400
B5 05 1.87 6 22
2615. 0.28 11.625
B4 75 -1.567 2 56
B3 3122. -0.81 - 13.877
3.63
35 2 11
4542. 3.70 20.190
B2 81 -2.283 8 27
-
1173. 23.2
B1 24 1.52 74 5.2144
-
2683. 8.98 11.925
A5 24 4.661 4 51
3888. 21.0 17.282
C5 61 -6.595 28 71
- -
5524. 11.01 3.44 24.551
D5 19 4 7 96
2353. 9.08 10.460
C3 64 -0.149 9 62
-
3617. 0.64 16.077
C2 54 0.795 6 96
5167. 3.27 22.968
D2 97 -3.229 6 76
3443. 3.17 15.305
D4 66 3.573 4 16
-
4357. 5.85 19.365
D3 26 -2.619 7 6
-
2675. 16.65 16.3 11.890
D1 29 8 97 18
605.4 4.99 2.6909
A2 6 -1.632 7 33
202.6
CIRC 8 2.1 -2.91 0.9008
-
333.6 4.26
CIRC 3 1.71 6 1.4828
-
369.9 1.89 1.6441
CIRC 4 -2.829 1 78
374.8 0.08 1.6658
CIRC 1 -3.957 1 22
CIRC 366.9 -3.505 1.17 1.6306
Final year project Department of Civil Engineering
Jimma University 2010
Structural design of G+7 building with basement
9 67
365.2 0.40 1.6234
CIRC 7 0.545 9 22
367.9 1.6355
CIRC 9 0.145 -1.17 11
- -
363.4 1.59 2.18 1.6153
CIRC 5 4 2 33
-
356.5 1.71 1.5844
CIRC 1 -3.45 4 89
-
591.2 6.16 4.53 2.6276
CIRC 3 1 3 89
2.19 1.5604
CIRC 351.1 0.47 4 44
356.3 1.44 0.79 1.5837
CIRC 5 6 6 78
-
356.3 1.44 0.76 1.5839
CIRC 8 4 6 11
-
332.0 1.19 3.07 1.4759
CIRC 9 8 2 56
- -
1756. 6.93 2.05
p 53 9 6 7.8068
-
1360. 10.2 0.58 6.0472
p 64 67 3 89
p 773.4 1.91 - 3.4375
5 9 1.33 56
Final year project Department of Civil Engineering
Jimma University 2010
Structural design of G+7 building with basement
4
-
1300. 4.69 3.63 5.7811
p 76 6 1 56
-
975.7 1.52 4.3365
p 3 -8.97 5 78
- -
1059. 22.9 2.41 4.7106
p 9 22 3 67
-
556.2 5.03 0.96 2.4723
p 8 2 2 56
-
1458. 0.06 20.2 6.4828
p 65 8 22 89
-
3387. 6.50 10.0 15.055
p 47 5 2 42
3872. 9.19 17.212
p 71 -6.69 6 04
-
260.7 0.32 0.27 1.1589
p 6 1 5 33
- -
440.2 1.53 1.66 1.9565
p 2 9 2 33
- -
420.1 2.92 2.76 1.8673
p 6 1 8 78
- -
247.0 1.01 1.58 1.0980
p 7 6 6 89
573.62
sum 39
Area ratio = 573/804 *100 = 71.26% > 50% so that provision of mat
foundation is economical for this building.
1 9 2.622
COMB 5734.8 -
BASE E3 1 -1.69 3.59 4
-3.425 1.287
-
COMB 289.6 213.1 121.02
BASE E4 1 7 6 3030.6 4 7.887
-
COMB - 283.7 18.42
BASE E5 1 41.26 8 4339.1 60.382 7
COMB 5040.0 -
BASE B5 1 -4.14 -2.53 5 1.87 3.256
COMB 2615.7 -
BASE B4 1 0.35 1.73 5 1.567 0.282
COMB 3122.3 -
BASE B3 1 -4.53 0.79 5 -0.81 3.632
COMB 4542.8 -
BASE B2 1 4.5 2.6 1 2.283 3.708
-
COMB - 1173.2 23.27
BASE B1 1 94.32 4.87 4 1.52 4
COMB - 2683.2 -
BASE A5 1 11.63 -5.95 4 4.661 8.984
COMB 161.8 3888.6 - 21.02
BASE C5 1 1 7.08 1 6.595 8
-
COMB - 5524.1 11.01 -
BASE D5 1 236.9 11.79 9 4 3.447
COMB 2353.6 -
BASE C3 1 11.26 -0.08 4 0.149 9.089
COMB 3617.5 -
BASE C2 1 -0.88 -1.24 4 0.795 0.646
COMB 5167.9 -
BASE D2 1 3.96 3.68 7 3.229 3.276
COMB 3443.6
BASE D4 1 3.93 -5.4 6 3.573 3.174
COMB 4357.2 - -
BASE D3 1 -7.26 2.66 6 2.619 5.857
-
COMB 198.9 - 2675.2 16.65 16.39
BASE D1 1 8 21.88 9 8 7
BASE A2 COMB 21.81 5.69 605.46 - 4.997
1 1.632
COMB - -
BASE CIRC 1 67.95 79.73 202.68 2.1 -2.91
COMB - -
BASE CIRC 1 -8.8 28.14 333.63 1.71 4.266
COMB - -
BASE CIRC 1 13.52 0.87 369.94 2.829 1.891
COMB -
BASE CIRC 1 19.71 15.39 374.81 3.957 0.081
COMB -
BASE CIRC 1 18.07 17.34 366.9 3.505 1.179
COMB
BASE CIRC 1 15.45 -3.87 365.27 0.545 0.409
COMB
BASE CIRC 1 12.93 3.67 367.99 0.145 -1.17
COMB - -
BASE CIRC 1 5.37 17.99 363.45 1.594 2.182
COMB -
BASE CIRC 1 -1.56 26.87 356.51 -3.45 1.714
COMB
BASE CIRC 1 13.6 21.61 591.23 -6.161 4.533
COMB
BASE CIRC 1 19.08 4.15 351.1 0.47 2.194
COMB
BASE CIRC 1 13.34 7.85 356.35 1.446 0.796
COMB -
BASE CIRC 1 1.06 12.8 356.38 1.444 0.766
COMB - -
BASE CIRC 1 18.85 14.06 332.09 1.198 3.072
COMB 1756.5 -
BASE p 1 -2.67 8.39 3 -6.939 2.056
COMB - 1360.6 10.26 -
BASE p 1 -0.58 50.75 4 7 0.583
COMB -
BASE p 1 -1.66 -2.65 773.45 1.919 1.334
COMB 101.5 1300.7 -
BASE p 1 -4.26 4 6 4.696 3.631
COMB -
BASE p 1 -1.68 15.27 975.73 -8.97 1.525
BASE p COMB -3.17 1.13 1059.9 - -
1 22.92 2.413
2
COMB 107.1
BASE p 1 1.31 9 556.28 -5.032 0.962
COMB 1458.6 20.22
BASE p 1 81.16 -1.19 5 -0.068 2
-
COMB 190.7 155.6 3387.4
BASE p 1 5 3 7 -6.505 10.02
-
COMB 277.0 3872.7
BASE p 1 65.84 6 1 -6.69 9.196
COMB -
BASE p 1 2.78 -1.01 260.76 0.321 0.275
COMB - -
BASE p 1 28.38 0.52 440.22 -1.539 1.662
COMB -
BASE p 1 -5.9 1.99 420.16 -2.921 2.768
COMB - -
BASE p 1 16.68 0.39 247.07 -1.016 1.586
- -
129065 113.3 13.35
SUM .4 49 9
Assume one meter ribbed mat foundation with bottom, top and earth fill
size shown below.
C-30Mpa, concrete
S-400MPa, steel
p 6ea 6eb
soil A {1 a b }
My 164.69 Mx 97.90
ea eb
= p = 1977.60 = 0.083m & = P = 1977.60 = 0.049m
Slab load
Final year project Department of Civil Engineering
Jimma University 2010
Structural design of G+7 building with basement
lengt weigh
panel h width DL t
(KN/m2 W(KN
No. L(m) w(m) ) )
429.7
po 6 5.8 12.35 1
429.7
p1 6 5.8 12.35 1
429.7
p1 6 5.8 12.35 1
429.7
p2 6 5.8 12.35 1
429.7
p3 6 5.8 12.35 1
333.4
p4 6 4.5 12.35 0
333.4
p5 6 4.5 12.35 0
333.4
p6 6 4.5 12.35 0
444.5
p7 6 6 12.35 3
444.5
p7' 6 6 12.35 3
444.5
p8 6 6 12.35 3
444.5
P8 6 6 12.35 3
P9 6 6 12.35 444.53
P9' 6 6 12.35 444.53
P10 6 6 12.35 444.53
P11 6 6 12.35 444.53
P12 6 4.71 12.35 348.95
P13 6 4.71 12.35 348.95
P14 6 4.5 12.35 333.40
p16 5.8 1.8 12.35 128.91
p18 6.4 1.8 12.35 142.25
p17 4.5 1.8 12.35 100.02
p19 30 1 12.35 370.44
p20 28.6 1 12.35 353.15
p21 28.6 1 12.35 353.15
p18 30 1 12.35 370.44
P15 6 4.5 12.35 333.40
Total weight due to 9888.
slab= 03
Beam load
lengt
beam h width depth weight
axis L(m) w(m) d(m) W(KN)
A 5.8 0.4 1 58.00
B 28.8 0.4 1 288.00
C 26.8 0.4 1 268.00
D 26.8 0.4 1 268.00
E 28.8 0.4 1 288.00
F 26.8 0.4 1 268.00
1 24 0.4 1 240.00
2 30 0.4 1 300.00
3 28.25 0.4 1 282.50
4 28.25 0.4 1 282.50
5 28.25 0.4 1 282.50
6 30 0.4 1 300.00
z 16.75 0.4 1 167.50
3293.
total weight due to beam= 00
lengt weigh
panel h width DL t
(KN/m2 W(KN
No. L(m) w(m) ) )
396.7
P1 6 5.8 11.4 2
396.7
P2 6 5.8 11.4 2
396.7
P3 6 5.8 11.4 2
396.7
P4 6 5.8 11.4 2
396.7
P5 6 5.8 11.4 2
307.8
P6 6 4.5 11.4 0
307.8
P7 6 4.5 11.4 0
307.8
P8 6 4.5 11.4 0
410.4
P16 6 6 11.4 0
410.4
P17 6 6 11.4 0
410.4
P18 6 6 11.4 0
410.4
P19 6 6 11.4 0
410.4
P20 6 6 11.4 0
410.4
P21 6 6 11.4 0
TOTAL = 22309.92KN
Area proportioning
Pd = 165441.1KN
p 6ea 6eb
soil A {1 a b }
My 13.36 Mx 113.349
ea eb
= p = 165441.1 = 0.00008296m & = P = 165441.1 =
0.00068157m
p 6ea 6eb
Qactual = A {1 + a + b }
The effect of moment is almost negligible so the pressure is almost the same
at all corners, so it is uniform.
Bottom slab
Type y 2) m) s (KNm/m)
5. 1.034 xs 0.04 Mxs
6 8 48 179.50 5.8 = 1 = 247.57
5. 1.034 xf Mxf
6 8 48 179.50 5.8 = 0.03 = 241.54
5. 1.034 ys 0.03 Mys
6 8 48 179.50 5.8 = 7 = 223.42
5. 1.034 yf 0.02 Myf
S1-S5 6 8 48 179.50 5.8 = 3 = 138.88
4. 1.333 xs 0.07 Mxs
6 5 33 179.50 4.5 = 1 = 258.08
4. 1.333 xf 0.05 Mxf
6 5 33 179.50 4.5 = 3 = 192.65
4. 1.333 ys 0.04 Mys
6 5 33 179.50 4.5 = 5 = 163.57
4. 1.333 yf 0.03 Myf
S6-s15 6 5 33 179.50 4.5 = 4 = 123.59
xs 0.04 Mxs
6 6 1 179.50 6 = 1 = 264.94
xf 0.03 Mxf
6 6 1 179.50 6 = 12 = 201.61
ys 0.03 Mys
6 6 1 179.50 6 = 9 = 252.02
S16- yf Myf
S25 6 6 1 179.50 6 = 0.03 = 193.86
dmin = Mmax
0.8 bfcdPmaxm (10.4 Pmaxm)
= 264.9
0.8100013.60.01931.97(10.40.01931.97) = 230.1mm<
300mm.OK!
= [
1 1
2M max
2
b d f cd ] f cd
* f yd
= [
1 1
226410 6
1000300213.6 ] 13.6
* 347.826 = 0.0096< max
As = 0.0096*1000*300 = 2883.67mm2
Use 20@100m
16c/c10
123.59 1000 300 0.0042 1260 0
20c/c10
264.94 1000 300 0.0096 2880 0
20c/c15
201.61 1000 300 0.0071 2130 0
0.0091 20c/c10
252.02 1000 300 5 2745 0
20c/c15
193.86 1000 300 0.0066 1980 0
Reinforcement detailing
L= 6/3=2m, L= 4.5/3= 1.5m so, the total length of support bar between
panel 1and 10 is 3.5m.
Hook length L= /5
20347.82
Ld= 41.351 = 1286mm
16347.82
Ld= 41.351 = 1029.8mm
Vs= Vy=VyPdLx
This can be equivalent with full length distributed load on the beam having
the same effect on beam. This is done by equating the maximum moment of
the above load dispersion to the new equivalent beam.
vx and Vy are coefficients of shear taken from table A-3 pp114 EBCS
2,1995.
Vy = F( support condition)
2 1 5 6 3 4 9
5. 1.03 179. 0.3 0.3 374. 343.5
5 1 8 4 5 6 3 8 6 0 0
4. 1.07 179. 0.3 0.3 264. 248.7
10 1 2 1 5 5 3 62 9 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 336. 266.5
11 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 02 6 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 336. 266.5
12 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 02 6 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 339. 266.5
13 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 26 6 0 0
4. 1.07 179. 0.3 0.3 264. 248.7
16 1 2 1 5 5 3 62 9 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 336. 266.5
17 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 02 6 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 336. 266.5
18 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 02 6 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 336. 266.5
19 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 02 6 0 0
4. 179. 0.4 0.3 336. 266.5
20 1 5 1.33 5 2 3 02 6 0 0
179. 0.3 0.3 355. 355.4
24 1 6 1 5 3 3 41 1 0 0
179. 0.3 0.3 355. 355.4
25 1 6 1 5 3 3 41 1 0 0
179. 0.3 0.3 355. 355.4
26 1 6 1 5 3 3 41 1 0 0
179. 0.3 0.3 355. 355.4
27 1 6 1 5 3 3 41 1 0 0
Beam on axis c
Deflection requirement
d {0.4+0.6*fyk/400}le/a
d 0.85 (le/ a)
le -> effective length of the member (shorter span in case of two way
slab )
Since the depth of the girder beam is large it is safe for surveiciblity
deflection
= 1000 50 -8
= 942mm
=
1773.176KNm
Msupp= 2604KNm
Mextra= 830.8KNm
50
942
M2
As2= '
fyd( dd ) = 347.8
830.8
= 2677.74mm2