Models Comparison
Models Comparison
Advantages 1. It provides an easy 1. Teacher is 1.It has a feedback Input is given by the
to follow step-by- involved in the mechanism, so it provides curriculum developers, target
step guide to development of students with ways to group, other stakeholders in
curriculum planning the curriculum. measure their progress or the development of the
and development accuracy. curriculum.
2. It begins with a set 2.It also sets the school Stakeholders engaging in the
of clear objectives objective as a final step in as planning and development
that teachers must well as the first. It clearly calls stages empowers and
plan tasks and work for the setting up of acknowledges them,
towards achieving objectives. especially teachers, as
the specified valuable contributors.
outcomes Users and other parties
3. It aims at student's involved are given ample
developing behavior opportunity to contribute.
as their target of
teaching.
Disadvantage 1. It does not have a 1.Teachers not The objective includes Walker describes what
s feedback mechanism understand the behavioral characteristics. happens in the process of
to tell people how to connection between Behavioral objectives have curriculum design but does
correct it. the content, some limitations on not describe what actually
2. It seems lack a activities, teaching execution. E.g. How can happens in the classroom.
procedure between methods and one measure a students The process for deliberation
evaluation and evaluation. increased smoothness in can be time consuming and
organisation, and this 2. Keeping the writing? resource intensive, and can
procedure is execution. resources up to It seems to lack a result in curriculum products
For example, they do date. procedure between that may not be consistent
not apply to all subjects 3. Maintaining organising and integrating and aligned internally.
or the design of a training for new learning experience content Consensus is often hard to
subjects content. teachers on the and evaluation. According achieve when developing
3. It sees curriculum method as well as to Huang & Yang (2004), curriculum at national or
development as a support needed for this procedure is the regional levels.
fixed, linear process. teachers as they execution of this integrated
4. The division of labor must review the content.
at the various plan often.
points/steps are fixed
so curriculum actors
are unaware of what
others do .
5. It cannot account for
the many/complex
outcomes of learning.
6. It limits what
students can learn.
7. It treats ends and
means separately.
8. It doesnt indicate
who decides what is
worthwhile learning.
9. It doesnt consider
that not all learning
outcomes can be
measured
10. It fails to consider
the changing
environment.
11. It fails to recognise
that the future cannot
be predicted accurately
with precision.