Collaboration
Collaboration
GENERAL INFORMATION
RESOURCE DESCRIPTION
Its an online discussion board for students. They can post discussions and comment on one anothers. I
can choose whether or not I have to approve submissions. They can customize it as the please and be
able to share information much quicker.
Students can use this to share results about their experiments. They can get peer feedback on how they
could reword things. I could even go as fas as to allow them to work as a collective on group study guides
before tests and I only approve answers that are correct. I can allow this to be a collaboration across all
of my different classes too, it doesnt have to just be each individual. This way, students would also be
able to have quicker access to help with homework or questions before coming to me directly.
The integration idea described: The integration idea The integration idea described:
described:
aligns to content standards aligns to content standards
aligns to content standards
transforms a lesson in a way that serves as a nice supplement to
would be impossible or very enhances a lesson; likely to a lesson but wouldnt necessarily
difficult without it; very likely to increase student engagement play a critical role within the
increase student engagement and and support mastery of the lesson
contribute to mastery of the concept(s)
concept(s) will most likely be used by the
will most likely be used by teacher during a lesson (e.g., a
optimal in a student-centered the students directly demonstration)
environment where students are
active and engaged in learning
content
VALUE-ADDED EXPLANATION
Based on the value-added rating scale above, how would you rate the technology integration
you described, using the selected resource?
I would rate this a 2. It may be able to evolve into a 1, but until I figured out exactly how responsible my
students would be. I would like it to at first just be a lesson enhancement, and not just the sole source of
peer edits.