See

discussions, stats, and author profiles for this publication at: https://www.researchgate.net/publication/263895528

Design Calculation Of Nozzle Junction Based On

ASME Pressure Vessel Design Code

Article May 2014

CITATIONS READS

0 8,774

4 authors, including:

Maharshi J. Bhatt Ashish Gohil

1 PUBLICATION 0 CITATIONS Nirma University
11 PUBLICATIONS 21 CITATIONS
SEE PROFILE

SEE PROFILE

All in-text references underlined in blue are linked to publications on ResearchGate, Available from: Ashish Gohil
letting you access and read them immediately. Retrieved on: 23 September 2016
 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

Design Calculation Of Nozzle Junction Based On ASME P ressure

Vessel Design Code

Asst. Prof. Maharshi J. Bhatt1 , Asst. Prof. Ashish Gohil2 , Hardic Shah 3, Nikunj Patel4
1
Production Engineering Department, SSEC, Bhavnagar [email protected]
2
Mechanical Engg. Department, Nirma University, Ahmadabad [email protected]
3
Manager L &T, Ranoli, Baroda, [email protected]
4
Asst. manager L &T, Ranoli, Baroda, [email protected]

Abstract: Nozzle is a device designed to control the direction or characteristics of fluid

(especially to increase velocity) as it exits (or enters) an enclosed chamber or pipe. Under
different loading conditions, the stress will occur at the nozzle to head or shell junction area.
Thus reliable and accurate design calculation for head or shell to nozzle junction is necessary.
The calculation for nozzle design gives the information whether the design is adequate for
given parameters. In this paper, design calculation of nozzle junction based on ASME
pressure vessel design code is carried out for nozzle to head junction subjected to applied
external load, internal pressure and moments. The equations are as per ASME Section VIII
Division I. This paper gives methodize steps and format for design calculation for
reinforcement of nozzle. The results are also compared with PV-Elite code.

Keywords- Reinforcement area, Nozzle shell junction, Parallel limit, Normal Limit,
Layout Angle.

I. INTRODUCTION
Providing additional material in the region of the opening by thickening the shell or
adding a pad material is known as reinforcement. It may be inside or outside. Generally
distance is kept equal to diameter [D] from the center of the nozzle It is called boundary limit
of effective Reinforcement.

1.1. Need of reinforce ment

Openings in pressure vessels in the regions of shells or heads are required to serve the
following purposes: Manways for letting personnel in and out of the vessel to perform,
routine maintenance and repair, Holes for draining or cleaning the vessel, Handhole openings
for inspecting the vessel from outside, Nozzles attached to pipes to convey the working fluid
inside and outside of the vessel, For all openings, however, nozzles may not be necessary. In
some cases nozzles and piping that are attached to the openings, while in other cases there
could be a manway cover plate or a handhole cover plate that is welded or attached by bolts
to the pad area of the opening. Nozzles or openings may be subjected to internal or external
pressure, along with attachment loads coming from equipment and piping due to different ial
thermal expansion and other sources. From reinforcement calculation following parameters
can be obtained: Wall Thicknesses required (Shell and Nozzle), Area of Reinforcement
required, Area of Reinforcement available, Cross-sectional area of various welds available
for reinforcement, Cross-sectional area of material added as reinforcement, Total area
available Size of reinforcing pad (if required), Size of fillet welds (inside, outside and
reinforcing pad fillet- if required), Maximum nozzle distance projects beyond the inner
surface of the vessel wall.

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 1

 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

II. METHODOLGY AND STEPS FOR NOZZLE DESIGN CALCULATION

Figure 1.Reinforced nozzle

2.1 Steps for Nozzle Design Calculation

Fig 1. Show the cross-sectional view of reinforced nozzle that indicates nozzle and shell
thickness area, reinforcement locations and weld paths, parallel and normal limits with its equations.

1. Mi ni mum required shell thickness is given by:

Tr s = (P*R)/(2*S*E-0.2*P)

Figure 2.Nozzle Shell junction area Figure 3.main parameters for reinforcement

2. Mini mum required nozzle thickness is given by:

Tr n = R( exp([P/(SE)] - 1 )
3. The reinforcement area required is Ar:

Ar = (d * tr * F + 2 * tn * tr* F * (1-fr1 ))

4 LIMITS:
Parallel limit:
(a) d (b) tn + ts+ R (Use greater value.)
Normal limit:
(a) 2:5* ts (b) 2:5 *tn + te (Use smaller value)

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 2

 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

5. The reinforcement area avail able in the shell (up to a distance d), A 1 is given by:

A 1 =d (E1 * ts f * tr) -2 * tn (E1 * ts F * tr) * (1-fr1 )

A 1 =2 (t s tn ) *(E1 * t F* tr) -2 * t n (E1 * t s F * tr) * (1-fr1 ) (Use larger value.)

6. The reinforcement area available in nozzle wall is available in two parts A 2 :

A2=5 (t n -t rn ) * fr2 *ts
A2=5 (t n -t rn ) * fr2 * tn (Use smaller value.)

7. Area available in inward nozzle:

A 3 =5tt j * fr2
=5tit j * fr2
= 2ht i * fr2 (Use smaller value.)

The total area available for reinforcement :

Atotal = Ar +A1+ A2+ A41 + A43+ A6

If the available area exceeds than the required area Design is adequate.
Ar< Atotal

III. NOZZLE REINFORCEMENT CALCULATION

Figure 4.Geometrical Diementions

3.1 Nozzle

Dimensions of the self reinforced nozzle are shown in Fig. 4. The reinforcement
calculation is carried out as per ASME guidelines and it shows that the total area available is
more than the required area. The nozzle Inside Diameter (ID) is 101.6 mm and hub thickness
is 46 mm. Table 2 shows the other parameters of nozzle. To determine the reinforcement
requirements following parameters are given as input.

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 3

 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

Table 1.Shell Parameters Table 2.Nozzle Parameter

Internal pressure 15.69 MPa Material SA-105
(P) Allowab le Stress at Temperature 138 MPa
Design temperature 70 C Sn
(Temp) Allowab le Stress At Ambient 138 MPa
Shell Material SA-516 ,60 Sna
Diameter Basis ID
Shell Allowable Stress 118 MPa
(at design Temperature) Layout Angle 90
Shell Allowable Stress 118 MPa Diameter 101.6 mm
(at Amb ient temperature) Hub Height of Integral Nozzle 105 mm.
Inside Diameter of Hemispherical 1878 mm h
Head D Height of Beveled Transition 9.2 mm.
Head Finished (M inimu m) 66 mm L`
Thickness t Hub Thickness of Integral 46 mm.
Head Internal Corrosion 0 mm Nozzle tn
Allowance C
Head External Corrosion 0 mm
Allowance C0
Distance from Head Centerline 600 mm
.
L1

User Entered Minimu m Design -29.00 C
Metal Temperature

3.2. Reinforcement calculations:

3.2.1Checking nozzle in the meridional direction:
a. Required thickness of spherical head(Inte rnal Pressure):as per UG 37(a)

Tr s = (P*R)/ (2*S*E-0.2*P) per UG-27 (d) (i)

= (1.61*939.0001)/ (2*12*1.00-0.2*1.61)
= 63.8624 mm.

Required thickness of nozzle wall:

(Here nozzle radius (50.8) and nozzle thickness (30.15) so Tn > Rn so use Appendix 1-2(a)
(1))
Tr n = R (exp ([P/ (SE)] - 1) per Appendix 1-2 (a)(1) (ii)
= 50.800(exp ([1.61/ (14.06*1.00]-1)
= 6.1639 mm.

b. He re, hub height=105 mm and hub thickness=46 mm

If h > (2:5 * hub thickness) use UG: 40 fig(e-2)

If h < (2:5 * hub thickness) use UG: 40 fig(e-1)
Here, using UG: 40 fig (e-1)

c. Limits:
Parallel limit:

(a) d =323.8 mm

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 4

 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

(b) tn + ts+ R= 161.9 mm (iii)

Normal limit:
(a) 2:5* ts= 2:5* 66 = 165 mm
(b) 2:5 *tn + te= 2:5 * (30.15) + te= 102.828 mm (iv)

te= Hub Thickness-Neck Thickness (v)

cos30

= 4630:50
cos30
= 27.4530
So,
Parallel Limit: 323.8 mm. For parallel limit consider larger value.
Normal Limit: 102.828 mm. For normal limit consider smaller value.

d. Weld strength reduction factor:

f r1 = 1 or fr1 = Sn = 1.16 Where , Sn =14.06 and Sa=14.02

Sa

f r2 =1 or f r2 =1.16

fr3 = f r2 = 1 (use minimum values) (vi)

e. To calculate the ope ning chord length at mid surface of the required shell thickness
procedure is as follows:(use Appendix-L,L7.7)

Rm= Rs+trs2 = 939 +63.740 = 970.87 (vii)

2
Calculation of area:

Ar = (d * tr * F + 2 * tn * tr* F * (1-fr1 )) UG-37(c) . (viii)

= (129.4663 * 63.8624 * 1.0 + 2 * 46.0000 * 63.8340 * 1.0 * (1-1))
= 8254.566 mm

Reinforcement areas per figure UG-37.1

Area available in s hell (A1 ): A1 = 229:616 mm2 or
A1 = 434.598 mm2 (use large values)

Area available in nozzle outward (A2 ):

If A2 upper side should smaller than A2 inside use UG 37(b)

If not less than 0.5 require reinforcement each side opening So A2 on inside should not
greater than A2 upside.
Therefore , A2 = 5890.77 mm2

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 5

 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

Area available in inward + outward weld (A41+ A43) or (A4+ A5):

= (leg2 * fr2) = 0 (viiii)

Area (A41+ A43) will not consider because welds vary from fillet to butt type weld.

Area available in Hub section A6 :

A6 = (2 * [min (Tlnp.h0.. Hub height (h))] * (Hub thickness - t n ) * fr2 (3:23)) (x)
= (2 * [min (102.8, 400, 105)] * (46 - 30.15) * 1
= 3269.04 mm2

Ar = Area required = 8254.566 mm2

A1 = Area required in shell = 434.5986 mm2
A2 = Area required in nozzle wall = 5890.77 mm2
A41 + A43 =Area required in weld = 0 mm2
A6 = Area required in Hub = 3269.04 mm2

Atotal = Ar +A1+ A2+ A41 + A43+ A6

= 9594:408 mm2

Ar= 8254 mm2

Here, Ar< Atotal

This condition indicates that for the given design parameters required area is less than the
total area. Hence, there is no need to add any extra amount of material. So, opening is
adequately Reinforced. If the required area is more than te total area then the reinforcement
pad is required.

IV. CONCLUSION

The above mentioned detailed Calculation is carried out to determine the requirement of the
reinforcement pad for the given loading condition as per ASME Section VIII, Div. I. This
calculation steps simplifies the reinforcement calculation. The calculation result suggests that
there is no need for providing reinforcement pad and hence self reinforced nozzle is used. If
condition is Ar> Atotal than only additional reinforcement would be required.

VII. R EFERENCES

[1] Eckart WeiB & Jiirgen Rudolph, Finite element analyses concerning the fatigue strength of nozzle -to-
spherical shell intersections, University of Dort mund, Depart ment of Chemical Engineering, Working
Group Pressure Vessel Design, Dort mund, Germany, page 101-109, 1995.
[2] Z. F. Sang, L. Li, H. L. Qien, Effect of geometric gap between cylinder and reinforcement pad on local
stresses (axial thrust load on nozzle), page 113-120,1997.
[3] J. Ascough and W. M. G. Malalasekera, Stress analysis of hemis pherical shells with single nonradially
penetrated nozzles, Depart ment of Mechanical Engineering, Loughborough University, Loughborough,
page 894-900 1996.
[4] C. J. Dekker and H. J. Bos, Nozzles -on external loads and internal pressure, Amsterdam, The Netherlands,
page 1-18, 1997.

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 6

 International Journal of Advance Engineer ing and Research Development (IJAERD)
Volume 1,Issue 5,May 2014, e-ISSN: 2348 - 4470 , print-ISSN:2348-6406

[5] V.N. Skopinsky and A.B. Smetankin, Paramet ric study of reinforcement of pressure vessel head with offset
nozzle, Moscow, Russian Federation, page 333-343, 2002.
[6] J.S. Liua, G.T. Parksb, P.J. Clarksonb, Shape optimization of axisymmet ric cylindrical nozzles in spherical
pressure vessels subject to stress constraints, International Journal o f Pressure Vessels and Piping, page 1-9,
2001.
[7] H. F. Wang et al, Elastic Stresses of Pressurized Cylinders with Hillside Nozzle, Depart ment of Mechanical
and Power Engineering, Nanjing University of Technology, Nan jing, Ch ina, page 625-631, 2008.
[8] ASME, Bo iler and Pressure Vessel Code, Section Vlll, Div ision 1 and Division 2, 1995 Ed ition, A merican
Society Of Mechanical Eng ineers, 2010, UG 36-46.
[9] ASME, Bo iler and Pressure Vessel Code, section II, part d, division 2, A merican Society of Mechanical
Engineers, 2007.

@IJAERD-2014, All rights Reserved 7