Scribd
Upload
142 views22 pages

Session 9 LPP Solver Problem Par Inc Sensitivity Report Template For Students

The document reports the results of using Excel Solver to optimize production levels of two product types (Standard and Deluxe bags) given constraints on available production hours and demand. The solver found a solution that maximized total profit by setting the Standard bag production level to 539.984 bags and the Deluxe level to 252.011 bags while satisfying all constraints. The report provides details on the objective value, variable values, constraint formulas and statuses.

Uploaded by

manee4u
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
142 views22 pages

Session 9 LPP Solver Problem Par Inc Sensitivity Report Template For Students

The document reports the results of using Excel Solver to optimize production levels of two product types (Standard and Deluxe bags) given constraints on available production hours and demand. The solver found a solution that maximized total profit by setting the Standard bag production level to 539.984 bags and the Deluxe level to 252.011 bags while satisfying all constraints. The report provides details on the objective value, variable values, constraint formulas and statuses.

Uploaded by

manee4u
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
We take content rights seriously. If you suspect this is your content, claim it here.
Available Formats
Download as XLSX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 22

Microsoft Excel 16.

0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [LPP-Solver-Problem Par and 1-6.xlsx]Par-Inc Demosol
Report Created: 21-01-2017 14:44:18
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.032 Seconds.
Iterations: 2 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNeg

Objective Cell (Max)


Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$11 Maximize Total Profit Standard 19 7667.94172245

Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$10 Bags produced Standard 1 539.984249311
$C$10 Bags produced Deluxe 1 252.011025482

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula
$B$14 Cutting and Dyeing Hours Used 630 $B$14<=$D$14
$B$15 Sewing Hours Used 480.000472521 $B$15<=$D$15
$B$16 Finishing Hours Used 708 $B$16<=$D$16
$B$17 Inspection and Packaging Hours Used 117.001181302 $B$17<=$D$17
ons are satisfied.

%, Assume NonNegative

Integer
Contin
Contin

Status Slack
Binding 0
Not Binding 119.9995275
Binding 0
Not Binding 17.9988187
Operation Standard Deluxe Time Available
Cutting and Dyeing 0.7 1 630
Sewing 0.5 0.83333 600
Finishing 1 0.6667 708
Inspection and Packaging 0.1 0.25 135
Profit per bag 0 0

Model Decision Variables


Standard Deluxe
Bags produced 539.9842493109 252.011 what needs to be optimised
Maximize Total Profit 0 SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Constraints Hours Used Hours available


Cutting and Dyeing 630 <= 630
Sewing 480.0004725207 <= 750
Finishing 708 <= 708
Inspection and Packaging 117.0011813017 <= 135
a. Revise profit of Deluxe to 18

b. Standard bag-$20 and Delxue is original $9

c. Sewing capacity increased to 750

100 Percent Sensitivity Rule


eeds to be optimised by changing a. Profit is revised to $11.50 and $8.25
J=TARGET VAR
b. 20 additional hours of Cutting and Dyeing tim
available hours of Finishing.
Subject to
constraints
nd Delxue is original $9

eased to 750

ity Rule
11.50 and $8.25

of Cutting and Dyeing time and 100 additional


Microsoft Excel 16.0 Answer Report
Worksheet: [LPP-Solver-Problem Par and 1-6.xlsx]M&D Chemicals
Report Created: 21-01-2017 15:07:37
Result: Solver found a solution. All Constraints and optimality conditions are satisfied.
Solver Engine
Engine: Simplex LP
Solution Time: 0.016 Seconds.
Iterations: 3 Subproblems: 0
Solver Options
Max Time Unlimited, Iterations Unlimited, Precision 0.000001
Max Subproblems Unlimited, Max Integer Sols Unlimited, Integer Tolerance 1%, Assume NonNeg

Objective Cell (Min)


Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$11 Maximize Total Profit Product A 5 800

Variable Cells
Cell Name Original Value Final Value
$B$10 Products produced Product A 1 250
$C$10 Products produced Product B 1 100

Constraints
Cell Name Cell Value Formula
$B$14 Processing time Hours Used 600 $B$14<=$D$14
$B$15 Total Production Hours Used 350 $B$15>=$D$15
$B$16 Demand for A Hours Used 250 $B$16>=$D$16
onditions are satisfied.

ance 1%, Assume NonNegative

Integer
Contin
Contin

Status Slack
Binding 0
Binding 0
Not Binding 125
Operation Product A Product B Requirement
Processing time 2 1 600
Total Production 1 1 350
Demand for A 1 125

Production Costs 0 0

Model Decision Variables


Product A Product B
Products produced 250 100 what needs to be optimise
Minimize Total Cost 0 SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Constraints Hours Used Hours available


Processing time 600 <= 600
Total Production 350 >= 350
Demand for A 250 >= 125
eeds to be optimised by changing
J=TARGET VAR

available
Subject to
constraints
Feed Component Std Enr Add
Ingrdt A
Ingrdt B
Ingrdt C
Mix
Cost per pound

Model Decision Variables


Std Enr Add
Products produced 1 1 1
Minimize Total Cost 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


Ingrdt A 0 0
Ingrdt B 0 0
Ingrdt C 0 0
Mix 0 0
Requirement

what needs to be optimised by changing


SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
DistributionChannel Marine Business Retail
Advertising budget
Salesforce availability
Production Level
Retail stores reqmt
Profit

Model Decision Variables


Marine Business Retail
Channel Mix 1 1 1
Maximise Profit 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


Advertising budget 0 0
Salesforce availability 0 0
Production Level 0 0
Retail stores reqmt 0 0
Direct Requirement

Direct
1 what needs to be optimised by changing
SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
Home Loans Personal L Auto Loans
New Funds
Min Home Loans
Personal Loan reqmt

Maximize Returns

Model Decision Variables


Home Loans Personal L Auto Loans
Products produced 1 1 1
Maximise Profit 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


New Funds 0 0
Min Home Loans 0 0
Personal Loan reqmt 0 0
Requirement

0 what needs to be optimised by changing


SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
S1 S2 D1 D2
SuperSaver Demand Forecast
Deluxe Demand Forecast
Business Demand Forecast
Available type 1
Available Type 2
Maximize

Model Decision Variables


S1 S2 D1 D2
Rooms 1 1 1 1
Maximise Profit 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


SuperSaver Demand Foreca 0 0
Deluxe Demand Forecast 0 0
Business Demand Forecast 0 0
Available type 1 0 0
Available Type 2 0 0
B2 Reqmt

B1
1 what needs to be optimised by changing
SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
Lisa David Sara Reqmt
Total Time
Lisa reqmt
Minimum Sara
Max Sara
Max Lisa
Minimize

Model Decision Variables


Lisa David Sara
Hours 1 1 1
Minimize 0

Constraints LHS Requirement


Total Time 0 0
Lisa reqmt 0 0
Minimum Sara 0 0
Max Sara 0 0
Max Lisa 0 0
what needs to be optimised by changing
SET OBJ=TARGET VAR

Subject to
constraints
A B C D Supply
Avery 100 125 115 100 160
Baker 120 135 115 120 160
Campbell 155 150 140 130 160

MAX 57925

A B C D Supply
Avery 0 40 100 0 140 160
Baker 40 35 0 85 160 160
Campbell 140 0 0 0 140 140
180 75 100 85
LA Chicago Columbus Atlanta Newark Kansan cityDnver
Dallas

You might also like