Scribd
Upload
12 views

Critical Reasoning Lessons Learned

This document outlines lessons learned for critical reasoning. It recommends using process of elimination as the best approach for most question types and avoiding absolutes. It emphasizes adhering strictly to the specificity and context provided in the text when evaluating inferences, arguments, surveys, and studies. Paying attention to why conclusions are drawn and looking for gaps in reasoning involving statistics are also highlighted.

Uploaded by

Samarth Tuli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
12 views

Critical Reasoning Lessons Learned

This document outlines lessons learned for critical reasoning. It recommends using process of elimination as the best approach for most question types and avoiding absolutes. It emphasizes adhering strictly to the specificity and context provided in the text when evaluating inferences, arguments, surveys, and studies. Paying attention to why conclusions are drawn and looking for gaps in reasoning involving statistics are also highlighted.

Uploaded by

Samarth Tuli
Copyright
© © All Rights Reserved
Available Formats
Download as DOCX, PDF, TXT or read online on Scribd
You are on page 1/ 1

CRITICAL REASONING LESSONS LEARNED

Process of Elimination is the Best Approach 9 times out of 10!


In most question types, absolutes are too extreme (e.g. all, never,
none, always, etc.). Identify those that are absolutes and eliminate as
necessary
The only logical relationship/inference between X and Y:
o If X, then Y. If not Y, then not X. No other conclusions can be
reached!
For inference questions, strictly adhere to the specificity of the text
Weaken the Conclusion: Find another reason/piece of evidence that
supports the conclusion
Resolve a Paradox: Stick to what specific information is given
o Answer may bring about new information
Pay attention to the why in the conclusion; this drives the answer!
For evaluating arguments, it is imperative to know the current context
for the basis of the argument (e.g. current bankruptcy failures/# of
people in the area)
o Usually applies when the question discusses % change
Keep an eye out for statistics and numbers in questions. There is
usually a gap in reasoning; stats are often used incorrectly in the real
world
For surveys and studies, representation is key

You might also like