Api 650-2015
Api 650-2015
1- INTRODUCTION 1
3- DESIGN DATA 1
4- DESIGN LOADS 2
13- FREEBOARD 28
1- INTRODUCTION 1
Water storage tank for the "" project shall be designed according to API 650 standard and its
relevant appendices. The tank has a 19 m diameter and 10 m height. Useful volume of the tank
3
is 2552 m .
3- DESIGN DATA 1
2/29
4- DESIGN LOADS 2
Thickness of the shell plates are calculated according to "1-Foot Method" as per clause 5.6.3,
since the diameter of the tank is less then 61 m. The required minimum thickness of shell plates
shall be the greater of the values computed by the following formulas:
3/29
C. Hei. H td tt ts tsc Wsp Wspc
C. No
(m) (m) (mm) (mm) (mm) (mm) (kN) (kN)
1 1,50 9,000 7,51 5,26 8,00 6,40 55,18 44,14
2 1,50 7,500 6,49 4,35 8,00 6,40 55,18 44,14
3 1,50 6,000 5,48 3,45 8,00 6,40 55,18 44,14
4 1,50 4,500 4,46 2,54 6,00 4,40 41,38 30,34
5 1,50 3,000 3,44 1,63 6,00 4,40 41,38 30,34
6 1,50 1,500 2,42 0,73 6,00 4,40 41,38 30,34
7 0,99 0,000 1,40 -0,18 6,00 4,40 27,45 20,13
8 0,00 -1,500 0,38 -1,09 6,00 4,40 0,00 0,00
9 0,00 -3,000 -0,64 -2,00 6,00 4,40 0,00 0,00
10 0,00 -4,500 -1,66 -2,90 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
11 0,00 -6,000 -2,68 -3,81 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
12 0,00 -7,500 -3,70 -4,72 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
13 0,00 -9,000 -4,72 -5,62 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
14 0,00 -10,500 -5,74 -6,53 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
15 0,00 -12,000 -6,76 -7,44 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
16 0,00 -13,500 -7,78 -8,35 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
17 0,00 -15,000 -8,80 -9,25 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
18 0,00 -16,500 -9,82 #### 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
19 0,00 -18,000 #### #### 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
20 0,00 -19,500 #### #### 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
21 0,00 -21,000 #### #### 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
22 0,00 -22,500 #### #### 5,00 3,40 0,00 0,00
Total weight 317,11 243,57
All bottom plates shall have a corroded thickness of not less than 6 mm as per clause 5.4.1.
If annular plates should be used, the required thickness of the plates shall be determined using
table 5.1a
Product stress : = = 126,61 MPa
4/29
Selected bottom plate thickness : tb = 8,00 mm
Selected annular plate thickness : tab = 6,00 mm
Self supporting cone roof requirements shall be checked first. Corroded thickness shall not be
more than 13 mm for self supporting cone roof. Loads shall be combined as per 5.2.2 and
applied to the roof plates.
NOTE: Self-supporting roofs whose roof plates are stiffened by sections welded to the plates
need not conform to the minimum thickness requirements, but the nominal thickness of the roof
plates shall not be less than 4.8 mm (3/16 in.) when so designed by
the Manufacturer, subject to the approval of the Purchaser.
5/29
Greater of load combination 5.2.2 : = ( ; )= 1,61 kPa
(e)(1) and (e)(2) with unbalanced snow
load
o
9,5 37 = 10 = 0,175 rad
+ + 5
4,8 2,2 5,5 2,2
Since the corroded roof plate thickness is more then 13 mm, supported cone roof shall be used.
The slope of the roof shall be 1:16 (3,6 degree) or greater if specified by the Purchaser. If the
rafters are set directly on chord girders, producing slightly varying rafter slopes, the slope of the
flattest rafter shall conform to the specified or ordered roof slope. Rafters shall be spaced to
satisfy:
1,5 1000
= 2100 b = 2526,7 mm
where
b is the maximum allowable roof plate span, measured circumferentially from center-to-center
of rafters;
Sy is the specified minimum yield strength of roof plate;
trc is the corroded roof thickness;
p is the uniform pressure as determined from load combinations given in 5.2.2.
o
Selected slope of the roof : =5 = 0,087 rad
1000
Min. required number of rafters : Nr = = 23,63
1000
Circumferential distance between :b = = 1244,07 mm
rafters measured from center-to-
center
6/29
Length of the rafters :s = = 9,54 m
cos
Surface area of the cone : Aco = = 284,85 m2
2
Since the roof is of cone type, loading is zero at the center and maximum at the periphery of
the tank roof and is uniformly increasing nature from center to periphery. This condition can be
considered as hinged end condition.
Max. bending moment on rafter : Mra = = 60,54 kN.m
3
1000
Stress on the primary rafters : pr = = 155,85 165,00 MPa OK
10
Induced compressive axial stress : ir = = 13,532 155,85 MPa OK
7/29
Approximate weight of the rafters : W ra = (( )+( )) 0,00981
W ra = 132,48 kN
1,05
Approximate weight of the roof plates : W rp = = 161,21 kN
1000
(5% for overlaps)
1,05
Approximate weight of the corroded : W rpc = = 124,36 kN
1000
roof plates (5% for overlaps)
: Fa = ( ; )= 141,00 MPa
The least allowable tensile stress for
the materials in the roof-to-shell joint
1000
Inside radius of tank shell : Rc = = 9500,00 mm
2
+ 2
Total participating area of shell and : Apsr = = 14,46 cm
100
roof plates
8/29
Required area for compression ring : Apc = = 44,48 cm2
250
The unstiffened length of the ring : Le = = 271,36 180 mm OK
9/29
Weight of the compression ring : W pc = 0,00981 = 28,62 kN
Total weight of the roof : Wr = + = 293,69 kN
Total weight of the corroded roof : W rc = + = 256,84 kN
Selected section for compression ring will be checked according to "Top Wind Girder"
calculations as per clause 5.9.6. The required minimum section modulus of the stiffening ring
shall be determined by the following equation:
=
17 190
Z = 98,835 145,00 cm3 OK
where
190
= 9,47 H1 = 27,49 m
where
After the maximum height of the unstiffened shell, H1, has been determined, the height of the
transformed shell shall be calculated as follows:
where
10/29
W tactual tuniform Wtr
C. No
(mm) (mm) (mm) (mm)
1 1500,00 8,00 6,00 730,71
2 1500,00 8,00 6,00 730,71
3 1500,00 8,00 6,00 730,71
4 1500,00 6,00 6,00 1500,00
5 1500,00 6,00 6,00 1500,00
6 1500,00 6,00 6,00 1500,00
7 995,00 6,00 6,00 995,00
8 0,00 6,00 6,00 0,00
9 0,00 6,00 6,00 0,00
10 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
11 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
12 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
13 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
14 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
15 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
16 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
17 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
18 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
19 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
20 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
21 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
22 0,00 5,00 5,00 0,00
Height of the transformed shell 7687,13
If the height of the transformed shell is greater than the maximum height H1, an intermediate
wind girder is as per clause 5.9.7.3.
Unanchored tanks, except supported cone roof tanks meeting the requirements of 5.10.4,
shall satisfy all of the following uplift criteria as per API 650 5.11.2.1.
1) 0,6 + < +
1,5
+
2) + < +
2
3) + < +
1,5
11/29
where
785
= + = 2185888,84 N.m
2 2
= = 379903,48 N.m
2
where
12/29
= 1,44 PWR = 0,67 kPa
190
2
= 860 PWS = 400,13 N/m
190
785
= MPi = 2695559,55 N.m
2
+ +
= 1000 MDL = 3845886,60 N.m
2
+
= 1000 MDLR = 1191452,93 N.m
2
where
where
Fby is the minimum specified yield stress of the bottom plate under the shell, in Mpa;
G is the actual specific gravity of the stored liquid or 0,7, whichever is less;
H is the design liquid height, in meters;
D is the tank diameter, in meters;
tb is the required thickness of the bottom plate under the shell.
= MF = 6835091,23 N.m
2
1) 0,6 + = 4007092,86
< + = 3755377,34 Not OK
1,5
+
2) + = <
3264112,66 + = 6531941,85 OK
2
3) + = <
1458127,31 + = 3755377,34 OK
1,5
The tanks is not stable. Anchor bolts calculations shall be done after seismic design.
13/29
10- STABILITY OF TANK AGAINST SEISMIC LOADS #
All factors and formulations to calculate seismic loads acting on the tank shall be taken from
API 650 Appendix E.
Seismic Zone : SZ =1
For sites not addressed by ASCE methods, the peak ground acceleration method shall be used.
The peak ground acceleration parameter will be calculated by using the effective ground
acceleration coefficient in TEC 2007. With a conservative approach, the effective ground
acceleration coefficient in TEC 2007 will be multiplied by two.
14/29
Q is scaling factor from the MCE to the design level spectral accelerations; equals 2/3
for ASCE 7
SDS is the design, 5% damped, spectral response acceleration parameter at short
periods (T = 0.2 seconds) based on ASCE 7 methods, equals Q*Fa*Ss, %g
SD1 The design, 5 % damped, spectral response acceleration parameter at one second
based on the ASCE 7 methods, equals Q*Fv*S1, %g
Q = 0,67
SDS = 1,33
SD1 = 0,87
15/29
C. Hei. ts
C. No Mid Elevations hm (m) hi*ts hi*ts*hm
(m) (mm)
1 1,50 0,750 8,00 12,00 9,00
2 1,50 2,250 8,00 12,00 27,00
3 1,50 3,750 8,00 12,00 45,00
4 1,50 5,250 6,00 9,00 47,25
5 1,50 6,750 6,00 9,00 60,75
6 1,50 8,250 6,00 9,00 74,25
7 0,99 9,498 6,00 5,97 56,70
8 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
9 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
10 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
11 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
12 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
13 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
14 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
15 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
16 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
17 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
18 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
19 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
20 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
21 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
22 0,00 0,000 0,00 0,00 0,00
10,00 68,97 319,95
Equivalent uniform thickness of tank : tu = = 6,90 mm
shell
Height from the bottom of the tank : Xs = = 4,64 m
shell to the shells center of gravity
16/29
1
Natural period of vibration for : Ti = = 0,148 s
2000
impulsive mode of behavior
0,578
Convective (sloshing) period : Ks = = 0,596 s
3,68
coefficient tanh( )
Ac = >
Ac = 0,149 %g
17/29
Total weight of the tank contents : Wp = 9,81 = 25032752,19 N
4
based on the design specific gravity of
the product
0,866
Effective impulsive portion of the : Wi = 1,333
liquid weight 0,866
Wi = 12998575,09 N
3,67
Effective convective (sloshing) portion : Wc = 0,230 N
of the liquid weight
Wc = 11429805,47 N
Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of the lateral seismic force
related to the impulsive liquid force for ringwall moment;
Xi = 0,375 1,333
Xi = 3,375 m
Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of lateral seismic force
related to the convective liquid force for ringwall moment;
3,67
1
Xc = 1,0 3,67 3,67
Xc = 5,370 m
Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of the lateral seismic force
related to the impulsive liquid force for the slab moment;
0,866
Xis= 0,375 1,0 + 1,333 1,0 1,333
0,866
Xis = 7,540 m
18/29
Height from the bottom of the tank shell to the center of action of lateral seismic force
related to the convective liquid force for the slab moment;
3,67
1,937
Xcs = 1,0 3,67 3,67
Xcs = 7,132 m
Total weight of fixed tank roof including framing, knuckles, any permanent attachments and
10 % of the roof balanced design snow load;
Wr = + + + 0,1 1000
Wr = 316054,29 N
1
Height from the bottom of the tank : Xr = + + = 10,277 m
3 2
shell to the roof and roof
appurtenances center of gravity
Ringwall moment, portion of the total overturning moment that acts at the base of the tank
shell perimeter;
The slab moment, is the total overturning moment acting across the entire tank base cross-
section. This overturning moment is used to design slab and pile cap foundations;
Ms = ( + + ) + ( ) = 44537687,48 N.m
For self-anchored tanks, a portion of the contents may be used to resist overturning. The
anchorage provided is dependent on the assumed width of a bottom annulus uplifted by the
overturning moment. The resisting annulus may be a portion of the tank bottom or a separate
butt-welded annular ring. The overturning resisting force of the annulus that lifts off the
foundation shall be determined by the following equation:
[ 23647,17 ] [ 25779,00 ]
19/29
where
Fy = 235,00 Mpa
Ge = (1 0,4 )= 0,75
ta = 6,00 mm
1) The resisting force is adequate for tank stability (i.e. the anchorage ratio, J 1.54).
2) The maximum width of annulus for determining the resisting force is 3.5 % of the tank
diameter.
3) The shell compression satisfies E.6.2.2.
4) The required annulus plate thickness does not exceed the thickness of the bottom shell
course.
5) Piping flexibility requirements are satisfied.
785
Calculated design uplift load due to : wint = = 4749,59 N/m
product pressure per unit
circumferential length
Anchorage ratio :J =
1 0,4 + 0,4
J = 2,171
20/29
Tank is not stable and cannot be self-anchored for the design load. Modify the
annular ring if L < 0,035*D is not controlling or add mechanical anchorage.
When the bottom plate under the shell is thicker than the remainder of the tank bottom, the
minimum projection, L, of the supplied thicker annular ring inside the tank wall shall be the
greater of 0,45 m (1.5 ft) or as determined in equation (E.6.2.1.1.2-1); however, L need not be
greater than 0,035*D:
L = 0,610255 m = 610,26 mm
The maximum longitudinal shell compression stress at the bottom of the shell for mechanically-
anchored tanks shall be determined by the formula:
1,273 1
= 1 + 0,4 + = 13,98 Mpa
1000
The maximum longitudinal shell compression stress c must be less than the seismic allowable
stress FC, which is determined by the following formulas and includes the 33% increase for
ASD. These formulas for FC, consider the effect of internal pressure due to the liquid contents.
= 83 44
= 83 + 7,5 < 0,5 < 44
2,5
= 508,08
FC = 117,50 Mpa
21/29
Compression stress ratio : Rcs = = 0,12 Shell thickness is OK
The corroded weight of the shell and any corroded permanent attachments acting on the shell
including the portion of the roof plates and framing acting on the shell;
=( + + + + )1000 = 530023,10 N
4
Net seismic uplift load per Table 5.21a : Us = (1 0,4 )
Us = 4286131,79 N
4
Net wind uplift load per Table 5.21a : Uw = 785 +
Uw = -260053,37 N
Foundation:
The overturning stability ratio for mechanically-anchored tank system excluding vertical seismic
effects shall be 2.0 or greater as per API E.6.2.3-1.
0,5 + + + +
2
Dynamic hoop tensile stresses due to the seismic motion of the liquid shall be determined by
the following formulas:
3,68
1,85
=
3,68
= 9,81
2
22/29
where
The maximum allowable hoop tension membrane stress for the combination of hydrostatic and
dynamic membrane hoop effects should be less than allowable design stress of the shell
increased by 33%.
+ + +
2,5
T =
Y Ni Nc Nh t T
C. No Ratio
(m) (N/mm) (N/mm) (N/mm) (mm) (MPa)
1 9,000 287,033 33,740 839,108 6,400 186,962 1,026
2 7,500 279,060 35,173 699,257 6,400 161,042 0,884
3 6,000 255,141 39,592 559,405 6,400 133,316 0,732
4 4,500 215,275 47,375 419,554 4,400 150,860 0,828
5 3,000 159,463 59,181 279,703 4,400 105,381 0,578
6 1,500 87,705 76,013 139,851 4,400 59,339 0,326
7 0,000 0,000 99,301 0,000 4,400 22,568 0,124
8 -1,500 ###### 131,022 -139,851 4,400 7,012 0,038
9 -3,000 ###### 173,871 -279,703 4,400 2,687 0,015
10 -4,500 ###### 231,487 -419,554 3,400 5,939 0,033
11 -6,000 ###### 308,762 -559,405 3,400 15,671 0,086
12 -7,500 ###### 412,260 -699,257 3,400 33,276 0,183
13 -9,000 ###### 550,771 -839,108 3,400 60,142 0,330
14 -10,500 ###### 736,059 -978,960 3,400 98,532 0,541
15 -12,000 ###### 983,859 -1118,811 3,400 151,895 0,834
16 -13,500 ###### ###### -1258,662 3,400 225,360 1,237
17 -15,000 ###### ###### -1398,514 3,400 326,390 1,791
18 -16,500 ###### ###### -1538,365 3,400 465,613 2,555
19 -16,500 ###### ###### -1538,365 3,400 465,613 2,555
20 -18,000 ###### ###### -1678,216 3,400 657,843 3,610
21 -19,500 ###### ###### -1818,068 3,400 923,338 5,067
22 -21,000 ###### ###### -1957,919 3,400 ###### 7,076
23/29
Foundation Loads:
+ + + +
Dead load per unit length : DL = 1000
(Shell, roof and attachments)
DL = 10724,54 N/m
Live load per unit length : LL = 1000
(Live load on roof)
LL = 4770,15 N/m
= 2
Total load per unit area during : WTL = 90472,55 N/m
operation 4
Seismic Loads:
24/29
Sliding Resistance:
Vs = 7754499,74 N
Since 7754499,74 > 6010331,96 there is no need to add shear keys, tank is resisting to sliding.
Attachment of the anchor bolts to the shell shall be through stiffened chair-type assemblies or
anchor rings of sufficient size and height. Anchor chair design shall be done as per AISI Steel
Plate Engineering Data, Volume 2, Part VII, Anchor Bolt Chairs.
360
Angle between anchor bolts : b = = 7,50
Bolt spacing : Bsp = = 1253,76 mm
25/29
Anchor Chair Design:
Critical stress in the top plate occurs between the hole and the free edge of the plate. For
convenience we can consider this portion of the top plate as a beam with partially fixed ends,
with a protion of the total anchor bolt load distributed along part of the span.
c = 28,03 mm
1,0
Reduction factor :Z = = 0,98
0,177
+ 1,0
Z = 24,81
26/29
1,32 0,031
Maximum stress in the shell :S = +
1,43 ,
+ 4
Since the calculated stress in the shell is higher than the maximum stress value which is 25 ksi,
a reinforcement plate with the same thickness as bottom shell plate should be used.
1,32 0,031
S = +
2 1,43 , 2
+ 4
2
S = 18,71 ksi OK
Welding Design:
Tot. load on weld per lin. in. of weld :W = + = 1,047 kips per lin. in. of weld
Horizontal load per lin. in. of weld : WH = = 0,463 kips per lin. in. of weld
+ 0,667
Vertical load per lin. in. of weld : WV = = 0,94 kips per lin. in. of weld
+ 2
Allowable load per lin. in : Wal = 9,62 kips per in. of weld size
> OK
27/29
12- SHEAR KEY DESIGN #
hg = 5,00 cm
hk = 15,00 cm
x = 10,00 cm
tx = 1,00 cm
y = 8,00 cm
ty = 1,00 cm
dx = 0,00 cm
Av = 8,00 cm2
Ah = 10,00 cm2
2 1
Base shear for each shear key : Vsk =
1000 1000 9,81
Vsk = 25,73 t
Moment about x-x axis : Msk = ( + ) = 321,59 t.cm
+
Moment of inertia : Iy = + = 203,33 cm4
12 2
1
Ix = = 42,67 cm4
12
I =2 ( + )= 492,00 cm
4
+2
Halfwidth of the box :Y = = 5,00 cm
2
28/29
13- FREEBOARD #
Sloshing of the liquid within the tank or vessel shall be considered in determining the
freeboard required above the top capacity liquid level. A minimum freeboard shall be provided
per Table E.7. Purchaser shall specify whether freeboard is desired for SUG I tanks. Freeboard is
required for SUG II and SUG III tanks. The height of the sloshing wave above the product
design height can be estimated by:
= 0,42 s = 2,37 m
1 1
= 4 =
4
= >4 = >
Af = 0,30
29/29