Lab Open Ended Dry Sieve Analysis
Lab Open Ended Dry Sieve Analysis
LITERATURE REVIEW
There are two soil classification systems in common use for engineering
purposes. The Unified Soil Classification System is used for virtually all
geotechnical engineering work except highway and road construction, where
the AASHTO soil classification system is used. Both systems use the results of
grain size analysis and determinations of Atterberg limits to determine soils
classification. Soil components may be described as gravel, sand, silt, or clay. A
soil comprising one or more of these components is given a descriptive name
and a designation consisting of letters or letters and numbers which depend on
the relative proportions of the components and the plasticity characteristics of
the soil.
Have high inter particle attraction and thus having sufficient cohesion
Susceptible to swelling and shrinkage, and possess low permeability
Silt
Since particle size ranges in between that of clay and sand thus
possessing properties of both sand and clays i. e. it shows slight cohesion
and also friction.
Sand
Grey in colour
No plasticity
Gravel
The AASHTO system classifies soils into seven primary groups, named A-1
through A-7, based on their relative expected quality for road
embankments, sub-grades, sub-bases, and bases. Some of the groups are in turn
divided into subgroups, such as A-1-a and A-1-b. Furthermore, a Group Index may
be calculated to quantify a soils expected performance within a group. To
determine a soils classification in the AASHTO system, one first determines the
relative proportions of gravel, coarse sand, fine sand, and silt-clay. ( Refer Figure
1)
Figure 1
Secondly, if any fines are present, Atterberg limits are determined and the
plasticity index is calculated. A soil is a granular material if less than 35% of the
soil by weight passes the No. 200 sieve (#200). Granular materials are classified
into groups A-1 through A-3. Soils having more than 35% passing the No. 200
sieve are silt-clay and fall in groups A-4 through A-7. Having the proportions of
the components and the plasticity data, one enters one of the two
alternatives AASHTO classification tables and checks from left to right until a
classification is found for which the soil meets the criteria. It should be noted
that, in this scheme, group A-3 is checked before A-2. Soils classified as A-1 are
typically well-graded mixtures of gravel, coarse sand, and fine sand. Soils in
subgroup A-1-a contain more gravel whereas those in A-1-b contain more sand.
Soils in group A-3 are typically fine sands that may contain small amounts of
non-plastic silt. Group A-2 contains a wide variety of borderline granular
materials that do not meet the criteria for groups A-1 or A-3. Soils in group A-
4 are silty soils, whereas those in group A-5 are high-plasticity elastic silt. Soils in
group A-6 are typically lean clays, and those in group A-7 are typically highly
plastic clays. Within groups containing fines, one may calculate a group index to
further evaluate relative quality and supporting value of a material as sub-grade.
The group index is calculated according to the following empirical formula:
Material passing the No. 200 sieve is silt-clay and is classified based
on Atterberg limits.
It should be noted that the division between gravel and sand is made at a
smaller size (No. 10 sieve) in the AASHTO system than in the unified
system (No. 4 sieve).
G for gravel
S for sand
M for silt
C for clay
O for organic soil
Clean sands and gravels (having less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve) are
given a second letter P if poorly graded or W if well graded. Sands and gravels
with more than 12% by weight passing the No. 200 sieve are given a second
letter M if the fines are silty or C if fines are clayey. Sands and gravels having
between 5 and 12% are given dual classifications such as SP-SM. Silts, clays, and
organic soils are given the second letter H or L to designate high or low plasticity.
The specific rules for classification are summarized as follows and described in
detail in ASTM D 2487.
For coarse-grained soils, the proportions of sand and gravel in the coarse
fraction (not the total sample) determine the first letter of the classification
symbol. The coarse fraction is that portion of the total sample retained on a No.
200 sieve. If more than half of the coarse fraction is gravel (retained on the No. 4
sieve), the soil is gravel and the first letter symbol is G. If more than half of the
coarse fraction is sand, the soil is sand and the first letter symbol is S. For sands
and gravels the second letter of the classification is based on gradation for clean
sands and gravels and plasticity of the fines for sands and gravels with fines.
For clean sands (less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve), the classification is
well-graded sand (SW) if C 6 and 1 Cc 3. Both of these criteria must be met
for the soil to be SW, otherwise the classification is poorly graded sand (SP).
Clean gravels (less than 5% passing the No. 200 sieve) are classified as well-
graded gravel (GW) if Cu 4 and 1 Cc 3. If both criteria are not met, the soil
is poorly graded gravel (GP). For sands and gravels where more than 12% of the
total sample passes the No. 200 sieve, the soil is a clayey sand (SC), clayey
gravel (GC), silty sand (SM), or silty gravel (GM).
METHODOLOGY
Percentage finer given in the last column can be used to plot the particle size
distribution curve with particle size as abscissa on log scale and the percentage
finer as ordinate.
6 mm 100 99 99
5 mm 100 98 97
3.35 mm 98 97 78
2.36 mm 96 95 52
1.70 mm 85 88 35
0.60 mm 68 67 27
0.335 mm 55 43 24
0.180 mm 47 35 22
0.063 mm 44 30 21
Cu = d60 Cc = d302
In this experiment, the particulate nature of soil was greatly observed. It was also
shown that certain classifications in soil can be done through sieve analysis. One
essential thing to do in this experiment is to arrange the sieves properly. The
accuracy of this experiment is very much dependent on the sieve arrangement.
The arrangement of sieves must be in decreasing mesh openings from top to
bottom. This is very useful in order to separate the particles from coarser to finer.
Lastly, It was observed that for particles having sizes larger that the sieve
opening to which it will be retained. On the other hand, those with smaller sizes
were able to pass through. This phenomenon is the basic reason on how particles
were separated.
CONCLUSIONS
REFERENCE
1. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Sieve_analysis
2. https://theconstructor.org/geotechnical/particle-size-distribution-of-soil-by-
seiving/2741/
3. https://www.google.com/#safe=strict&q=semi+log+graph+example